【摘要】：在語圖(語言和繪畫)視域中,福柯和利奧塔共同致力于將差異思想融入對語言和繪畫之間關(guān)系的思考,并借助來自繪畫的啟示探究語言的局限性和可能性。他們從后結(jié)構(gòu)主義立場出發(fā),格外關(guān)注符號的物質(zhì)性(不透明性)以及看和說之間的異質(zhì)性。福柯為揭示符號的物質(zhì)性提出"實(shí)物—畫"概念,并將看和說形成的復(fù)調(diào)性空間稱為"非場所"。利奧塔鑒于結(jié)構(gòu)主義語言學(xué)的封閉性和僵化性對符號物質(zhì)性造成剝奪,指出"圖形"對以結(jié)構(gòu)主義為代表的"話語"具有解構(gòu)作用,并把圖形(看)和話語(說)形成的"非場所"稱為"間世界"。他們二人就語圖問題展開的潛在對話是在(后)結(jié)構(gòu)主義和現(xiàn)象學(xué)之爭以及意識哲學(xué)(主體哲學(xué))的式微等思想文化背景中進(jìn)行的,所涉及到的對意識/無意識、主體/他者、理性/身體等問題的思考至今仍有啟示意義。
[Abstract]:In the perspective of language picture (language and painting) Foucault and Liotta work together to integrate the thought of difference into the consideration of the relationship between language and painting and explore the limitations and possibilities of language with the help of inspiration from painting. They pay special attention to the materiality (opacity) of symbols and the heterogeneity between seeing and saying from the post-structuralism standpoint. Foucault put forward the concept of "material-painting" in order to reveal the materiality of symbols, and called the polyphonic space formed by seeing and saying as "non-place". In view of the fact that the closeness and inflexibility of structuralist linguistics deprive the symbolic materiality, Liotta points out that "figure" has a deconstruction effect on the "discourse" represented by structuralism. And the figure (see) and discourse (say) formed by the "non-place" called "the world." The potential dialogue between the two of them on the problem of linguistic graph is carried out in the ideological and cultural background of (post) structuralism and phenomenology, as well as the decline of the philosophy of consciousness (philosophy of subject), which involves consciousness / unconsciousness, subject / other, etc. Rational / physical thinking is still instructive.
【作者單位】： 南京大學(xué)文學(xué)院;
【分類號】：J205

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 許平;;異質(zhì)性、合法性與中國設(shè)計(jì)敘事——重讀利奧塔的后現(xiàn)代思想文獻(xiàn)[J];南京藝術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(美術(shù)與設(shè)計(jì)版);2008年06期

，

本文編號：2251280