法律的文學敘事與歷史敘事——從歐陽修的《縱囚論》說起
發(fā)布時間:2018-05-01 03:13
本文選題:《縱囚論》 + 歐陽修; 參考:《天府新論》2017年03期
【摘要】:歐陽修的《縱囚論》作為史論性質的文學作品,旨在通過揭露唐太宗貞觀六年的縱囚之事來闡發(fā)暗含在政治權術下的虛假和偽善。歐陽修認為唐太宗以所謂的信義釋放死囚,既不符合法律懲治死刑犯的程序正義,也違背了大眾邏輯下的常規(guī)情理,只不過是一種帝王德政形象的塑造和宣示。從唐人的集體性贊頌到宋人而后的群體性批判,歐陽修的指摘在其中的轉捩,無疑開啟了宋人法律文化思潮的萌蘗。然而,歐陽修的論斷只是觸及了政治權術表層的意涵,卻沒有對唐太宗縱囚的緣由根柢進行本質性揭示。實際上,從漢晉至隋唐,歷史文本接續(xù)中皆存有類似的縱囚事例,這就不能以單向維度的判辨來歸因于帝王權力圖式影響下的歷史書寫。唐太宗施展特赦的舉措,固然既有帝王德政思維下追求"內圣外王"理想人格的需求,也有蘊含在教化和資治功用下的信義取向。不過,在省思傳統(tǒng)政治行為的過程中,我們更需要的是先忘卻政治正確與事實真相之間的變換。縷析《縱囚論》,不僅有助于思索自西漢法律儒家化以來的士大夫倫理文化,而且可以藉以追尋探討經過唐宋變革后的法律文化路徑嬗變。
[Abstract]:Ou Yangxiu's theory of longitudinal prisoners, as a literary works of historical nature, aims to elucidate the false and hypocrisy under political power by revealing the six years of Tang Taizong's convictions in the political power. Ou Yangxiu believes that Tang Taizong's release of the death prisoner by the so-called faith is neither in accordance with the procedural justice of the law punishing the death penalty, but also against the logic of the public. The general reason is only a kind of shaping and declaring the image of the emperor's German government. From the collective praise of the Tang people to the group criticism of the song and the people of the song and the latter, the transition of Ou Yangxiu's criticism has undoubtedly opened the tiller of the ideological trend of the song's law and culture. However, Ou Yangxiu's argument only touched the meaning of the surface of political power, but not to Tang Dynasty. In fact, from the Han Jin to the Sui and Tang Dynasties, from the Han, Jin to the Sui and Tang Dynasties, there were similar cases of the longitudinal prisoners, which could not be attributed to the historical writing under the influence of the imperial power schema by the judgment of the one-way dimension. However, in the process of thinking of traditional political behavior, we need to forget the transformation between the political correctness and the truth, and the analysis of the theory of "the theory of longitudinal prisoners" is not only helpful to think about the ethical culture of the scholar bureaucrats since the Confucianism of the Western Han Dynasty. Moreover, we can explore the evolution of legal culture after Tang and Song dynasties.
【作者單位】: 上海師范大學;
【基金】:上海師范大學研究生優(yōu)秀成果培育項目(編號:A-0132-16-002033)的階段性研究成果
【分類號】:I206.2
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前1條
1 綱強;政績與作秀[J];學習導報;2002年05期
,本文編號:1827473
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/hanyuyanwenxuelunwen/1827473.html
教材專著
熱點文章