中國(guó)古代年齡稱(chēng)名作為指稱(chēng)的一種,是指將中國(guó)古代人的年齡作為稱(chēng)名對(duì)象,用人主觀(guān)意識(shí)中與年齡相關(guān)的一切事物來(lái)對(duì)年齡進(jìn)行稱(chēng)名,這一活動(dòng)離不開(kāi)對(duì)稱(chēng)名對(duì)象的主觀(guān)認(rèn)知。本論文試圖借用概念轉(zhuǎn)喻這一認(rèn)知工具,從轉(zhuǎn)喻思維出發(fā)來(lái)對(duì)中國(guó)古代年齡稱(chēng)名進(jìn)行認(rèn)知研究。根據(jù)概念轉(zhuǎn)喻理論,轉(zhuǎn)喻映射遵循突顯性和鄰近性的認(rèn)知原則,人們?cè)谡J(rèn)知某一事物時(shí)會(huì)因?yàn)樽⒁獾慕裹c(diǎn)不同而突顯事物的不同側(cè)面,從而借用同一認(rèn)知域或認(rèn)知矩陣空間內(nèi)某個(gè)突顯的、易感知的、可替換的鄰近部分激活整體轉(zhuǎn)喻目標(biāo)。在中國(guó)古代年齡稱(chēng)名中,每個(gè)年齡也有突顯出來(lái)的相應(yīng)典型特征,這些突顯的、與年齡相關(guān)的鄰近概念被用來(lái)指代年齡,因此轉(zhuǎn)喻映射的鄰近性和突顯性原則可以為作者基于概念轉(zhuǎn)喻的中國(guó)古代年齡稱(chēng)名研究提供理論闡釋的可能性。通過(guò)研究,本論文得出以下結(jié)論:（1）年齡稱(chēng)名作為一種言語(yǔ)思維活動(dòng),基于長(zhǎng)時(shí)間對(duì)年齡突顯特征的認(rèn)真觀(guān)察,其關(guān)鍵在于年齡與鄰近概念之間的密切聯(lián)系;（2）轉(zhuǎn)喻映射基于突顯性原則和鄰近性原則,后者又可進(jìn)一步分為概念鄰近性和空間鄰近性?xún)煞N。借用轉(zhuǎn)喻映射的突顯性和鄰近性原則,突顯的、與年齡相關(guān)的鄰近概念可以被作為指稱(chēng)詞來(lái)指代年齡,從而完成對(duì)年齡的稱(chēng)名行為;（... 

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：60 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Abstract
摘要
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Research Background
    1.2 Research Purpose
    1.3 Research Methodology
    1.4 Organization of the Thesis
Chapter Two Previous Studies on Onomasiology
    2.1 Introduction
    2.2 Previous Studies on Onomasiology
        2.2.1 Definition of Onomasiology…
        2.2.2 Classification of Onomasiology
    2.3 Research Approaches to Onomasiology
        2.3.1 Semantic Approach to Onomasiology
        2.3.2 Syntactic Approach to Onomasiology
        2.3.3 Social and Cultural Approaches to Onomasiology
        2.3.4 Cognitive Approach to Onomasiology
    2.4 Summary
Chapter Three Theory of Conceptual Metonymy
    3.1 Introduction
    3.2 Definition and Features of Conceptual Metonymy
    3.3 Features of Metonymic Mapping
        3.3.1 Subjectivity of Metonymic Mapping
        3.3.2 Contiguity of Metonymic Mapping
        3.3.3 Prominence of Metonymic Mapping
    3.4 Explaining Power of Conceptual Metonymy on Referring
    3.5 Necessity of Applying Conceptual Metonymy to Study on Age Onomasiology
    3.6 Summary
Chapter Four A Metonymic Account of Age Onomasiology in Ancient China
    4.1 Introduction
    4.2 Age Onomasiology in Ancient China
        4.2.1 Main Types and Features of Signifiers of Age Onomasiology
        4.2.2 Typical Relations Between Signifiers and the Signified
        4.2.3 Principal Factors Affecting the Selection of the Signifiers
            4.2.3.1 Experiential Factors Affecting the Selection
            4.2.3.2 Communicative Factors Affecting the Selection
            4.2.3.3 Cultural Factors Affecting the Selection
    4.3 Typical Metonymic Patterns of Age Onomasiology
        4.3.1 HUMAN-RELATED SYMBOLS FOR AGE
            4.3.1.1 SYMBOLS OF GROWTH STAGES FOR AGE
            4.3.1.2 SYMBOLS OF DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING STAGES FOR AGE
            4.3.1.3 SYMBOLS OF MIND DEVELOPMENT STAGES FOR AGE
        4.3.2 NONHUMAN-RELATED SYMBOLS FOR AGE
            4.3.2.1 FIGURE FOR AGE
            4.3.2.2 DECOMPOSED FIGURE FOR AGE
    4.4 Summary
Chapter Five Conclusion
    5.1 Major Findings of This Study
    5.2 Pedagogical Applications of the Research on Age Onomasiology
    5.3 Limitation of This Study and Prospects for Future Research
Bibliography
Acknowledgements
Publications



本文編號(hào)：3665196