發(fā)布時(shí)間：2021-11-28 11:34

　　本研究旨在研究源文本的文本特征與概要寫(xiě)作任務(wù)難度之間的關(guān)系。本研究主要探討文本特征對(duì)概要寫(xiě)作任務(wù)難度影響的性質(zhì)及程度,同時(shí)對(duì)文本特征對(duì)學(xué)生概要寫(xiě)作策略影響也進(jìn)行討論。本研究屬于演繹類(lèi)研究,采用定性定量相結(jié)合的研究方法。選取“文本熟悉度”,“文本長(zhǎng)度”,“是否有標(biāo)題”以及“文本難度”作為研究對(duì)象,中等水平被試作為實(shí)驗(yàn)樣本,通過(guò)完成具有不同文本特征材料概要寫(xiě)作任務(wù)獲取量化行為數(shù)據(jù),通過(guò)問(wèn)卷調(diào)查和深度訪(fǎng)談獲取質(zhì)化認(rèn)知數(shù)據(jù)。然后通過(guò)相關(guān)系數(shù)、回歸方程等方式對(duì)量化數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行分析,通過(guò)關(guān)鍵詞分析等方式對(duì)質(zhì)化數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行分析,綜合探究文本特征對(duì)概要寫(xiě)作難度的影響。研究結(jié)果顯示,這四種文本特征會(huì)對(duì)概要寫(xiě)作任務(wù)難度產(chǎn)生較為復(fù)雜的影響:文本難度的變化會(huì)影響主要信息提取程度以及概要寫(xiě)作的邏輯結(jié)構(gòu);是否有標(biāo)題對(duì)于被試概要寫(xiě)作成績(jī)影響不大;對(duì)話(huà)題的熟悉程度會(huì)降低概要寫(xiě)作任務(wù)難度,而不熟悉則不太會(huì)增加任務(wù)難度。結(jié)果還顯示,學(xué)生的概要寫(xiě)作策略相對(duì)固定,不受原文本特征的影響。論文對(duì)背后的原因進(jìn)行了分析討論。本研究的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)在于目前國(guó)內(nèi)關(guān)于概要寫(xiě)作作為考試項(xiàng)目的研究還處于早期階段,本研究的結(jié)果可以為概要寫(xiě)作理論做出一定貢獻(xiàn),同... 

【文章來(lái)源】：上海外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)上海市 211工程院校 教育部直屬院校

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：128 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Acknowledgements
摘要
Abstract
List of Abbreviations
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Research Background
    1.2 Relevant researches home and abroad
    1.3 Significance of the Study
    1.4 Research Questions
    1.5 Layout of the Research
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Introduction
    2.2 Task Difficulty
        2.2.1 Definition of Task Difficulty
        2.2.2 Task Difficulty Models
        2.2.3 Factors Affecting Reading/Writing Task Difficulty
    2.3 Summary Writing
        2.3.1 Definition of Summary Writing
        2.3.2 Process of Summary Writing
        2.3.3 Strategy of Summary Writing
        2.3.4 Factors Affecting Summary Performance
        2.3.5 Criteria of Summary Writing
    2.4 Text Characteristics
        2.4.1 Definition of Text Characteristics
        2.4.2 Text Characteristics Affecting Summary Writing
    2.5 Summary
Chapter Three Methodology
    3.1 Introduction
    3.2 Method One: Summary Writing
        3.2.1 Participants
        3.2.2 Research Instruments
        3.2.3 Rating Consideration
        3.2.4 Data Collection
        3.2.5 Data Analysis
    3.3 Method Two: Questionnaire
        3.3.1 Subjects
        3.3.2 Research Instruments
        3.3.3 Data Collection
        3.3.4 Data Analysis
    3.4 Method Three: Interviews
        3.4.1 Subjects
        3.4.2 Research Instruments
        3.4.3 Data Collection & Analysis
    3.5 Summary
Chapter Four Results and Discussion
    4.1 Introduction
    4.2 Method One: Summary Writing
        4.2.1 Reliability of Ratings
        4.2.2 Overall Results of Score Dimensions
        4.2.3 Correlation between Score Dimensions
        4.2.4 Stepwise Regression
    4.3 Method Two: Questionnaire
        4.3.1 Overview
        4.3.2 Text Complexity
        4.3.3 Topic Familiarity
        4.3.4 Text Length
        4.3.5 Text Clues
    4.4 Method Three: Interview
        4.4.1 General Views on Summary Writing
        4.4.2 Task Difficulty of Summary Writing
        4.4.3 Summary Writing Strategy
    4.5 Summary
Chapter Five Discussion
    5.1 Introduction
    5.2 Correlation between Score Dimensions
    5.3 Influence of Text Characteristics on Task Difficulty
        5.3.1 Text Complexity
        5.3.2 Topic Familiarity
        5.3.3 Text Length
        5.3.4 Text Clues
    5.4 Summary Writing Strategy
    5.5 Implications
    5.6 Summary
Chapter Six Conclusion
    6.1 Research Findings
    6.2 Limitations of the Study
    6.3 Suggestions for Future Research
Reference
Appendix A: Six Texts Employed in this Research
Appendix B: Questionnaire Employed in this Research
Appendix C: Outlines of Interview



本文編號(hào)：3524350