范疇化是語(yǔ)言學(xué)的核心問(wèn)題,詞類范疇化問(wèn)題更是一個(gè)老大難問(wèn)題。在2014年德國(guó)語(yǔ)言學(xué)會(huì)第36屆年會(huì)上,詞類等語(yǔ)言范疇的研究被譽(yù)為語(yǔ)言中的“上帝粒子”研究,而漢語(yǔ)等分析語(yǔ)的詞類研究更是“哥德巴赫猜想”式難題。在漢語(yǔ)詞類研究中,概括詞的語(yǔ)法多功能現(xiàn)象飽受爭(zhēng)議。反義復(fù)合詞作為漢語(yǔ)特有的構(gòu)詞現(xiàn)象,一直以來(lái)備受學(xué)界關(guān)注,而多數(shù)研究均是圍繞其認(rèn)知機(jī)制、教學(xué)與習(xí)得等方面進(jìn)行的,少有對(duì)詞典中反義復(fù)合詞的詞類標(biāo)注進(jìn)行大數(shù)據(jù)實(shí)證研究。本文以兩部權(quán)威的漢語(yǔ)詞典（《現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)詞典》（第7版）（以下簡(jiǎn)稱《現(xiàn)漢》）和《現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)規(guī)范詞典》（第三版）（《現(xiàn)漢規(guī)范》））共有的264個(gè)反義復(fù)合詞為研究對(duì)象,以雙層詞類范疇化理論作為支撐,通過(guò)國(guó)家語(yǔ)委現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)語(yǔ)料庫(kù)和北京大學(xué)中國(guó)語(yǔ)言學(xué)研究中心現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)語(yǔ)料庫(kù)中反義復(fù)合詞的使用模式調(diào)查,進(jìn)而對(duì)其詞類歸屬進(jìn)行判斷。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),《現(xiàn)漢》和《現(xiàn)漢規(guī)范》在反義復(fù)合詞的詞類標(biāo)注中存在人為減少兼類的傾向。在共有的264個(gè)反義復(fù)合詞中,《現(xiàn)漢》和《現(xiàn)漢規(guī)范》中分別有62個(gè)和81個(gè)反義復(fù)合詞的詞類標(biāo)注存在問(wèn)題,錯(cuò)誤率分別為23.48%和30.68%,其中詞類漏標(biāo)問(wèn)題突出�；谡Z(yǔ)料庫(kù)調(diào)查顯示出的反義復(fù)... 

【文章來(lái)源】：四川外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)重慶市

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：93 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
Acknowledgements
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Rationale of the Study
    1.2 Objectives of the Study
    1.3 Layout of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Previous Studies on Word Classes
        2.1.1 Previous Studies on Origin and Criteria of Word Classes
        2.1.2 Previous Studies on Multifunctionality
    2.2 Previous Studies on Word Class Labeling in Chinese Dictionaries
    2.3 Previous Studies on Antonymous Compounds
        2.3.1 Definition of Antonymous Compounds in Chinese
        2.3.2 Recognition of Opposite Sense Relationships
        2.3.3 Relevant Researches on Antonymous Compounds
    2.4 Summary
Chapter Three Theoretical Foundation
    3.1 Theoretical Background of the Two-Level Word Class Categorization Theory
        3.1.1 Language as a Complex Adaptive System
        3.1.2 The Usage-Based Theory
        3.1.3 Theory of Norms and Exploitations
    3.2 Main Tenets of the Two-level Word Class Categorization Theory
    3.3 Summary
Chapter Four Research Design
    4.1 The Selection of Dictionaries and Corpora
    4.2 Data Collection
    4.3 Data Processing
Chapter Five Results and Discussion
    5.1 Results
        5.1.1 The Survey of the Shared Antonymous Compounds in CCD7 and in MCSD
        5.1.2 The Survey of the Shared Antonymous Compounds Based on Corpora
        5.1.3 Comparative Survey of the Shared Antonymous Compounds Among CCD7, MCSD3 and Corpus-based Results
        5.1.4 The Survey of Multi-category Lexemes and Their Frequency Ranks
    5.2 Discussion
        5.2.1 Discussion on the Word Class Labeling of Antonymous Compounds
        5.2.2 Causes of Improper Word Class Labeling
            5.2.2.1 The Infeasibility of the “Principle of Parsimony”
            5.2.2.2 The Misuse of Logic
        5.2.3 The Basis of Word Class Labeling: Corpus-Based Usage Pattern Surveys with a Case Study
    5.3 Summary
Chapter Six Conclusion
    6.1 Major Findings
    6.2 Limitations of the Study
    6.3 Suggestions for the Further Study
References
Appendices
    Appendix 1 Comparison of Word Class Labeling of 264 Antonymous Compounds Among CCD7, MCSD3 and Corpus-based Results
    Appendix 2 Comparison of Word Class Labeling of Antonymous Compounds with Improper Word Class Labeling Among CCD7, MCSD3 and Corpus-based Results..
    Appendix 3 The Frequency Ranks of 264 Shared Antonymous Compounds and Their Word Classes Based on Corpora


【參考文獻(xiàn)】：
期刊論文
[1]“出版”的詞類問(wèn)題與向心結(jié)構(gòu)之爭(zhēng)——一項(xiàng)基于雙層詞類范疇化理論的研究[J]. 王仁強(qiáng),楊旭.  漢語(yǔ)學(xué)報(bào). 2017(04)
[2]從雙層詞類范疇化理論看現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)自指詞項(xiàng)的兼類問(wèn)題[J]. 王仁強(qiáng),黃昌寧.  外國(guó)語(yǔ)文. 2017(01)
[3]基于HSK動(dòng)態(tài)作文語(yǔ)料庫(kù)的反義復(fù)合詞教學(xué)研究[J]. 劉牧虹.  清遠(yuǎn)職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào). 2016(05)
[4]《牛津高階英語(yǔ)詞典》（第8版）動(dòng)名兼類詞條表征策略研究[J]. 王仁強(qiáng),王端.  外國(guó)語(yǔ)文. 2016(02)
[5]兼類說(shuō)反思[J]. 周韌.  語(yǔ)言科學(xué). 2015(05)
[6]現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)兼類與詞頻的相關(guān)性研究——兼評(píng)“簡(jiǎn)略原則”的效度[J]. 王仁強(qiáng),周瑜.  外國(guó)語(yǔ)文. 2015(02)
[7]詞類的類型學(xué)和漢語(yǔ)的詞類[J]. 沈家煊.  當(dāng)代語(yǔ)言學(xué). 2015(02)
[8]現(xiàn)代英語(yǔ)兼類現(xiàn)狀研究——以《牛津高階英語(yǔ)詞典》（第7版）為例[J]. 王仁強(qiáng).  外國(guó)語(yǔ)(上海外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)). 2014(04)
[9]從漢語(yǔ)反義復(fù)合詞構(gòu)詞看漢語(yǔ)教學(xué)本位觀[J]. 張未然.  現(xiàn)代語(yǔ)文(語(yǔ)言研究版). 2014(01)
[10]基于語(yǔ)料庫(kù)的動(dòng)詞與構(gòu)式關(guān)系研究——以sneeze及物動(dòng)詞用法的規(guī)約化為例[J]. 王仁強(qiáng),陳和敏.  外語(yǔ)教學(xué)與研究. 2014(01)

博士論文
[1]反義復(fù)合詞形成演變的認(rèn)知研究[D]. 曾丹.浙江大學(xué) 2007

碩士論文
[1]《現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)詞典》（第6版）兼類詞表征策略研究[D]. 楊旭.四川外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué) 2017
[2]漢英詞典中反義復(fù)合詞的詞類標(biāo)注實(shí)證研究[D]. 吳雪靜.四川外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué) 2015
[3]漢語(yǔ)反義復(fù)合詞的MP模型分析[D]. 王興社.四川外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué) 2014
[4]論現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)反義復(fù)合詞及其教學(xué)[D]. 王敏蘭.遼寧師范大學(xué) 2013
[5]反義復(fù)合詞詞匯化過(guò)程中的語(yǔ)義發(fā)展[D]. 金碩.河北師范大學(xué) 2007
[6]反義語(yǔ)素合成詞研究[D]. 王冠.東北師范大學(xué) 2006
[7]漢語(yǔ)反義語(yǔ)素合成詞及其習(xí)得研究[D]. 廖暑業(yè).暨南大學(xué) 2006
[8]反義相成詞探究[D]. 郭奕晶.山東師范大學(xué) 2000



本文編號(hào)：3230680