【摘要】：在以"焚書坑儒"的相關(guān)記載及歷代"坑"人史料為依據(jù)的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)史料進(jìn)行分類辨析,結(jié)合考古發(fā)現(xiàn)成果及歷代文獻(xiàn)語(yǔ)言使用情況和上古人殉人祭文化背景分析,認(rèn)為對(duì)"坑"有"活埋"義,而同時(shí),語(yǔ)言學(xué)者亦把"坑"是否具有"活埋"義的界定置于該段史實(shí)的確定之上,因此,史實(shí)的確定與詞義的界定緊密關(guān)聯(lián)起來(lái),但這樣的相互參照是否可靠,需要我們做進(jìn)一步的探索。這一語(yǔ)言現(xiàn)象說(shuō)明語(yǔ)言研究要結(jié)合語(yǔ)言的主觀性和客觀性。
[Abstract]:On the basis of the relevant records of "burning books and Keng Confucianism" and the historical data of "Keng" people in previous dynasties, the author classifies and discriminates the historical materials, and analyzes the cultural background of the martyrdom of the upper ancients in the light of archaeological findings, the use of literature and language in previous dynasties, and the cultural background of sacrifice of martyrs of the upper ancients, At the same time, linguistic scholars put the definition of "pit" above the definition of the historical facts of this paragraph. Therefore, the determination of historical facts is closely related to the definition of the meaning of words. But whether such cross-references are reliable or not requires further exploration. This linguistic phenomenon shows that language research should be combined with subjectivity and objectivity of language.
【作者單位】： 廣西師范學(xué)院文學(xué)院;上海師范大學(xué)人文與傳播學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目(08BYY044) 上海市教育委員會(huì)科研創(chuàng)新項(xiàng)目(CW0816) 上海市重點(diǎn)學(xué)科建設(shè)資助項(xiàng)目(S30402)的研究成果
【分類號(hào)】：H131

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 黃展岳;;中國(guó)古代的人牲人殉問題[J];考古;1987年02期

2 張箭;;戰(zhàn)國(guó)長(zhǎng)平之戰(zhàn)趙降卒被秦坑殺數(shù)新探[J];齊魯學(xué)刊;2006年04期

3 石金鳴;宋建忠;;長(zhǎng)平之戰(zhàn)遺址永錄1號(hào)尸骨坑發(fā)掘簡(jiǎn)報(bào)[J];文物;1996年06期

4 白平;;“坑(，

本文編號(hào)：2437090