【摘要】：復(fù)句是韓漢語(yǔ)言研究中的一個(gè)非常重要的領(lǐng)域,使用頻率高、范圍廣、一直是學(xué)者們研究的焦點(diǎn)。本論文從語(yǔ)言的實(shí)際出發(fā),在前人研究成果的基礎(chǔ)上,研究了韓漢條件復(fù)句,總結(jié)了韓漢條件復(fù)句的特征,并運(yùn)用對(duì)比分析的方法,從語(yǔ)義、句法這兩個(gè)層面進(jìn)行了對(duì)比,找出了其異同點(diǎn)。 本文由四部分構(gòu)成： 第一部分是緒論,主要介紹研究的目的和意義、研究的內(nèi)容及范圍、方法,前人對(duì)韓漢條件復(fù)句的研究概況以及語(yǔ)料來(lái)源等。 第二章主要是從韓漢條件復(fù)句的語(yǔ)義層面上進(jìn)行對(duì)比。從基本意義和引申意義兩個(gè)方面來(lái)來(lái)分析韓漢條件復(fù)句的語(yǔ)義特征,并找出了它們之間的異同點(diǎn)�；疽饬x是從虛擬性和條件性兩方面考察；引申意義能則從語(yǔ)句的主體意識(shí)方面來(lái)考察。然后考察了韓國(guó)語(yǔ)條件關(guān)系接續(xù)詞“(?),(?),(?),”和漢語(yǔ)關(guān)聯(lián)詞“只有,只要,如果,不管,除非”等的個(gè)別語(yǔ)義。 第三章對(duì)韓漢條件復(fù)句的句法進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析�？疾炝隧n漢條件復(fù)句的語(yǔ)表形式、主語(yǔ)的制約問(wèn)題、謂語(yǔ)的選擇,以及和否定詞的搭配、和時(shí)制語(yǔ)尾的連接、句型的選擇等等問(wèn)題。 最后一部分是結(jié)論,對(duì)本文所述內(nèi)容進(jìn)行了概括,總結(jié)了韓漢條件復(fù)句在語(yǔ)義、句法等方面的異同點(diǎn),并指出了文中的不足之處及今后的努力方向。
[Abstract]:Complex sentence is a very important field in the study of Korean and Chinese language. It has been the focus of scholars because of its high frequency and wide range. On the basis of the previous researches, this thesis studies Korean and Chinese conditional complex sentences, summarizes the characteristics of Korean and Chinese conditional complex sentences, and compares them from semantic and syntactic aspects by using the method of contrastive analysis. The similarities and differences are found. This paper is composed of four parts: the first part is the introduction, which mainly introduces the purpose and significance of the study, the content and scope of the study, the methods, the previous studies of Han and Han conditional complex sentences and the source of the corpus. The second chapter is mainly from the Han-Han conditional complex sentence semantic level to carry on the contrast. This paper analyzes the semantic features of Korean and Chinese conditional complex sentences from two aspects of basic meaning and extended meaning, and finds out the similarities and differences between them. The basic meaning is from the two aspects of hypocrisy and conditionality, while the extended meaning can be examined from the subject consciousness of the sentence. Then we examine the individual semantics of the Korean conditional relation successor words "(?)," and Chinese relative words only, if, unless, etc. The third chapter makes a contrastive analysis of the syntax of Korean and Chinese conditional complex sentences. This paper examines the form of conditional complex sentences in Han and Han dynasties, the restriction of subject, the choice of predicates, the collocation of negative words, the connection of the end of the sentences and the choice of sentence patterns, and so on. The last part is the conclusion, summarizes the content of this paper, summarizes the similarities and differences in semantic and syntactic aspects of Korean and Chinese conditional complex sentences, and points out the shortcomings of the text and the direction of future efforts.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：H146;H55

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

中國(guó)期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù) 前5條

1 王佩云;“只要P,就Q”句式分析[J];天津成人高等學(xué)校聯(lián)合學(xué)報(bào);2002年04期

2 胡裕樹(shù) ,范曉;試論語(yǔ)法研究的三個(gè)平面[J];新疆師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1985年02期

3 陳淑梅;從無(wú)條件復(fù)句的關(guān)聯(lián)詞語(yǔ)說(shuō)起[J];語(yǔ)文教學(xué)與研究;1998年12期

4 王還;“只有…才…”和“只要…就…”[J];語(yǔ)言教學(xué)與研究;1989年03期

5 李曉琪;現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)復(fù)句中關(guān)聯(lián)詞的位置[J];語(yǔ)言教學(xué)與研究;1991年02期

中國(guó)碩士學(xué)位論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù) 前4條

1 王地娟;現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)復(fù)句基本問(wèn)題的研究[D];四川師范大學(xué);2004年

2 侯巍;漢語(yǔ)否定虛擬條件句研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2005年

3 邵彤彤;無(wú)條件條件句中的“管”字句研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2008年

4 孫洪花;漢韓條件復(fù)句對(duì)比[D];延邊大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2381235