【摘要】：進(jìn)入二十一世紀(jì)，語(yǔ)文教學(xué)中的費(fèi)時(shí)多、效率低的局面還沒(méi)有得到有效的改觀。語(yǔ)文課堂上，填鴨式教學(xué)、滿堂灌教學(xué)等不合理形式比比皆是。閱讀教學(xué)沒(méi)有出路、作文教學(xué)沒(méi)有思路的情況隨處可見(jiàn)。特別是對(duì)于語(yǔ)言學(xué)知識(shí)的教學(xué)，語(yǔ)文界存在著不少的矛盾，贊成的聲音、反對(duì)的聲音此起彼伏。有語(yǔ)言學(xué)教學(xué)誤導(dǎo)學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)的聲音，有不學(xué)習(xí)語(yǔ)言學(xué)知識(shí)學(xué)生語(yǔ)言表達(dá)能力非常低下的聲音。學(xué)生錯(cuò)句成篇，錯(cuò)話成堆，不堪入目，不堪入耳。嚴(yán)重時(shí)，有人甚至喊出振聾發(fā)聵的“語(yǔ)文教學(xué)誤盡蒼生”的憤怒之聲。 現(xiàn)實(shí)中的語(yǔ)文教學(xué)確實(shí)存在不少急需解決的問(wèn)題。本文欲把系統(tǒng)功能語(yǔ)言學(xué)中的主位推進(jìn)模式這一理論，運(yùn)用到語(yǔ)文的閱讀教學(xué)、作文教學(xué)當(dāng)中，對(duì)文章的思路進(jìn)行梳理。改變以往的語(yǔ)言知識(shí)教學(xué)中存在的只是靜態(tài)的傳授，沒(méi)有結(jié)合語(yǔ)境進(jìn)行動(dòng)態(tài)分析的局面。 在日常語(yǔ)文課堂中，存在一種單純的公式化的尋找中心句、過(guò)渡句的閱讀教學(xué)形式，讓學(xué)生脫離語(yǔ)境尋找文章的思路，導(dǎo)致學(xué)生養(yǎng)成一種偷懶的習(xí)慣，盲目摘取核心句。作文教學(xué)采取模式化的三段論形式，從形式上看很多的學(xué)生作文似乎讓人放心。但是就是拋開(kāi)語(yǔ)病不說(shuō)，段落中的每一句話卻在銜接連貫層面存在很大的混亂。把系統(tǒng)功能語(yǔ)言學(xué)中主位推進(jìn)模式這一理論應(yīng)用到語(yǔ)文教學(xué)中，對(duì)閱讀教材思路進(jìn)行梳理，指導(dǎo)學(xué)生在寫(xiě)作文時(shí)充分把握好主位的推進(jìn)方式，使得習(xí)作語(yǔ)句流暢，前后銜接連貫。 本文以系統(tǒng)功能語(yǔ)言學(xué)的主位推進(jìn)模式這一理論為語(yǔ)文教學(xué)的基礎(chǔ)理論，把它應(yīng)用到語(yǔ)文教學(xué)的有關(guān)領(lǐng)域。對(duì)教材和學(xué)生的習(xí)作進(jìn)行分析，發(fā)現(xiàn)主位推進(jìn)模式有利于文章脈絡(luò)的梳理。主位推進(jìn)模式這一理論最大的優(yōu)勢(shì)是實(shí)義切分，它的目的是為了了解語(yǔ)句內(nèi)部信息分布情況，改變了以往的靜態(tài)語(yǔ)言學(xué)脫離語(yǔ)境對(duì)話語(yǔ)進(jìn)行分析的狀態(tài)，，有利于語(yǔ)文教學(xué)過(guò)程中對(duì)話語(yǔ)基本脈絡(luò)的梳理。
[Abstract]:In the 21 century, the situation of time-consuming and inefficient Chinese teaching has not been effectively changed. Language classroom, spoon-fed teaching, filled with irrigation teaching and other unreasonable forms abound. Reading teaching has no way out, composition teaching can be seen everywhere. Especially for the teaching of linguistic knowledge, there are many contradictions in the field of language. There is the voice of language teaching which misleads students to learn, and the voice of very low language expression ability of students who do not learn linguistic knowledge. The students' wrong sentences are written, and the wrong words are piled up, unbearable and unfit to listen to. In serious cases, some people even cry out the "language teaching mistakes" angry voice. In reality, there are many problems that need to be solved in Chinese teaching. This paper attempts to apply the theory of thematic progression in systemic functional linguistics to the teaching of Chinese reading and composition. Change the former language knowledge teaching only static teaching, no dynamic analysis of context. In the daily Chinese classroom, there is a kind of simple formula to find the central sentence, the reading teaching form of the transition sentence, let the student look for the thought of the article from the context, lead the student to form a kind of lazy habit, blindly pick out the core sentence. Composition teaching takes the form of model syllogism, from the formal point of view, a lot of student composition seems to be reassuring. However, apart from language diseases, there is a great deal of confusion in every sentence in the cohesive coherence level. This paper applies the theory of thematic progression in systemic functional linguistics to Chinese teaching, combs the ideas of reading materials, instructs students to fully grasp the advancing mode of theme in writing compositions, and makes the sentences of the exercises fluent. Coherence. This paper takes the thematic progression model of systemic functional linguistics as the basic theory of Chinese teaching and applies it to the related fields of Chinese teaching. Through the analysis of textbooks and students' exercises, it is found that the thematic progression model is helpful to sort out the context of the article. The greatest advantage of the thematic progression model is semantic segmentation, which aims to understand the distribution of information within sentences and to change the previous state of static linguistics in which discourse is analyzed in isolation from context. In the process of Chinese teaching, we can sort out the basic context of discourse.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：H193

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 林曉英,羅時(shí)英;篇章分析與讀寫(xiě)能力培養(yǎng)——對(duì)大學(xué)英語(yǔ)精讀課篇章分析的探討[J];福建醫(yī)科大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年02期

2 趙鶴蘭;篇章分析及其在英語(yǔ)教學(xué)中的應(yīng)用[J];廣州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(綜合版);2000年06期

3 宋子江;思路與結(jié)構(gòu) 思路與句群——文章思路研究之二[J];河北師院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1997年04期

4 王曉紅;閱讀教學(xué)中的語(yǔ)篇分析[J];解放軍外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1999年S1期

5 雷良啟,余應(yīng)源;吸收當(dāng)代語(yǔ)言學(xué)的適用理論建構(gòu)語(yǔ)文教學(xué)科學(xué)化的言語(yǔ)知識(shí)體系[J];江西師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2000年02期

6 余文森;;課堂教學(xué)有效性的探索[J];教育評(píng)論;2006年06期

7 宋子江;理清思路對(duì)閱讀有什么用處——文章思路研究之三[J];河北師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1998年01期

8 宋子江;什么是思路──文章思路研究之一[J];河北師院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1997年03期

9 宋子江;怎樣理清思路──文章思路研究之四[J];河北師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(教育科學(xué)版);1999年01期

10 高行珍;;語(yǔ)篇分析在大學(xué)英語(yǔ)閱讀教學(xué)中的應(yīng)用[J];太原理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年01期

本文編號(hào)：2358887