【摘要】：庭審話語體現(xiàn)了法庭審判中各參與者之間由于話語資源的不均衡而產(chǎn)生的權力不對稱。同時，，權力不對稱的關系又影響著庭審話語的內(nèi)容和方式。目前國內(nèi)研究庭審話語與權力關系的學者側(cè)重于運用話語分析研究庭審話語，而從語境角度研究庭審話語與權力之間關系的資料不多。因此，本文作者結(jié)合語境理論，著重從語言學的角度研究研究庭審參與者的作用、地位以及其權力實現(xiàn)的手段。 本文運用語境理論，對當前的庭審話語權力在語境層面上進行分析，試圖揭示中國法庭審判中話語與權力的關系。通過現(xiàn)場法庭審判的錄音轉(zhuǎn)寫材料進行分析，以實現(xiàn)以下目標： 1揭示庭審中各個參與者的地位。 2揭示庭審話語中權力控制的表現(xiàn)形式。 3探討庭審中各話語方實現(xiàn)權力控制或權力抵制的手段。 本文作者嘗試運用語境理論，從情景語境、上下文語境和文化語境三個維度分析研究庭審話語。在情景語境下，分析法庭的場景、庭審話題以及各個參與者所扮演的角色，發(fā)現(xiàn)在法庭這個場景下，權力以固定的形式分配于各個參與者。在上下文語境下，主要研究庭審主要參與者如法官、公訴人、律師和原被告的話語手段。庭審審判過程事實上是一種庭審參與者之間的權力較量過程。法官是最有權勢的主體，可以進行指示、問話、裁決、甚至打斷等話語行為。公訴人和律師的權力則次之，而原被告則是處于被主導的地位，只能就他人的問話提供具體確切的答話。。在文化語境下，主要分析不同的法律體制、不同的法律文化、不同的法院建筑和庭審中參與者不同的背景，在庭審話語和權力分配中起到怎樣的影響。 綜上所述，作者主要是運用語境理論對中國庭審話語進行研究。本文創(chuàng)新點在于運用語境理論對庭審話語進行分析。
[Abstract]:The trial discourse reflects the asymmetry of power between the participants in the trial due to the imbalance of discourse resources. At the same time, the asymmetry of power affects the content and mode of court discourse. At present, domestic scholars who study the relationship between trial discourse and power focus on the use of discourse analysis to study court discourse, but there are few materials to study the relationship between court discourse and power from the perspective of context. Therefore, combining with context theory, the author focuses on the role and status of trial participants and the means to realize their power from the perspective of linguistics. Based on the theory of context, this paper analyzes the relationship between discourse and power in court trial in China. Through the analysis of the recorded transcripts of the on-site court trial, the following objectives are achieved: 1 revealing the status of each participant in the trial. (2) to reveal the manifestation of power control in court discourse. Third, to explore the means of power control or power resistance. The author tries to use the theory of context to analyze the trial discourse from three dimensions: situational context, contextual context and cultural context. In the context of the situation, this paper analyzes the court scene, the trial topic and the roles played by each participant, and finds that in the court context, power is assigned to each participant in a fixed form. In the context of the context, the main participants in the trial such as judges, prosecutors, lawyers and the original defendant discourse. In fact, the trial process is a process of power contest between the participants in the trial. The judge is the most powerful subject, who can direct, question, adjudicate, and even interrupt. The power of the prosecutor and the lawyer is second, and the original defendant is in the dominant position, can only provide specific and precise answers to the questions of others. In the context of culture, it mainly analyzes different legal systems, different legal cultures, different court buildings and different backgrounds of participants in court hearings. To sum up, the author mainly uses context theory to study Chinese trial discourse. The innovation of this paper is to use context theory to analyze the trial discourse.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：H136

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前9條

1 胡海娟;法庭話語研究綜論[J];廣東外語外貿(mào)大學學報;2004年01期

2 廖美珍;;中國法庭互動話語formulation現(xiàn)象研究[J];外語研究;2006年02期

3 熊學亮;語用學和認知語境[J];外語學刊(黑龍江大學學報);1996年03期

4 廖美珍;目的原則與法庭互動話語合作問題研究[J];外語學刊;2004年05期

5 胡壯麟;語境研究的多元化[J];外語教學與研究;2002年03期

6 何兆熊,蔣艷梅;語境的動態(tài)研究[J];外國語(上海外國語大學學報);1997年06期

7 杜金榜;從目前的研究看法律語言學學科體系的構(gòu)建[J];現(xiàn)代外語;2000年01期

8 廖美珍;;中國法庭互動話語對應結(jié)構(gòu)研究[J];語言科學;2003年05期

9 廖美珍;從問答行為看中國法庭審判現(xiàn)狀[J];語言文字應用;2002年04期

本文編號：2302129