【摘要】：Panther， Thornburg (1998:756)指出傳統(tǒng)推理理論的兩大不足：（1）傳統(tǒng)推理理論未能滿意地解釋聽(tīng)話人通常毫不費(fèi)力地做出語(yǔ)用推理這一事實(shí)；（2）傳統(tǒng)理論無(wú)法系統(tǒng)解釋有關(guān)的推理模式和認(rèn)知基礎(chǔ)。 本研究以言外轉(zhuǎn)喻的核心假設(shè)為出發(fā)點(diǎn)—言語(yǔ)行為的屬性從意義上與言語(yǔ)行為本身互代，言語(yǔ)行為指向其屬性(Panther,2004:103-104)。立足屬性操作本質(zhì)，旨在通過(guò)對(duì)整合理論、心理模型等語(yǔ)言學(xué)其它領(lǐng)域方法論的借鑒與融合，從聽(tīng)話人解讀角度出發(fā)改善言外轉(zhuǎn)喻運(yùn)作的宏觀機(jī)制，并在此基礎(chǔ)上提出“屬性加強(qiáng)聯(lián)想”模式，對(duì)言外轉(zhuǎn)喻微觀操作作出說(shuō)明，使其與原有的屬性假說(shuō)相比，對(duì)言語(yǔ)現(xiàn)象具有更強(qiáng)的解釋力，與現(xiàn)有的言外轉(zhuǎn)喻推理機(jī)制相比，具有更高的可操作性，在理論精細(xì)化的道路上更進(jìn)一步。簡(jiǎn)言之，本文的核心主要有兩部分—屬性加強(qiáng)聯(lián)想模式的建構(gòu)和言外轉(zhuǎn)喻的系統(tǒng)分析。 第一章提出了本文的研究背景、動(dòng)因、目的、假設(shè)和方法等，初步提出原言外轉(zhuǎn)喻中的不足。第二章在文獻(xiàn)評(píng)述的基礎(chǔ)上，對(duì)轉(zhuǎn)喻理論的貢獻(xiàn)、不足和可借鑒的方面做一概括。第三章理論框架對(duì)屬性操作模式的建構(gòu)做前期準(zhǔn)備，對(duì)屬性模式提供理論支撐，一方面要確保將要建構(gòu)的模式能夠有效補(bǔ)充和完善現(xiàn)有言外轉(zhuǎn)喻推理存在的問(wèn)題，為屬性推理最簡(jiǎn)解讀方案的根本理念提出做理論上的充分供給，另一方面要為屬性操作的整體框架和具體步驟等各類具體制約條件和操作情況提供素材。 第四章在基于前面幾章論述的基礎(chǔ)上，正式提出言外轉(zhuǎn)喻屬性操作模式，對(duì)言外轉(zhuǎn)喻理論未盡之處作出符合思維發(fā)展軌跡和應(yīng)用趨勢(shì)的理?yè)?jù)性論證，對(duì)整合理論的類屬和整合空間的操作性程序給予修正和完善，指出類屬空間是言外轉(zhuǎn)喻操作的必然而并非是可有可無(wú)，整合是類屬二次操作，對(duì)屬性各空間內(nèi)的具體操作做出細(xì)化說(shuō)明，從而確立推理是認(rèn)知語(yǔ)用視角下，聽(tīng)話人角度出發(fā)采用屬性歸納加強(qiáng)聯(lián)想的因果程序進(jìn)行解讀的根本性理念。 繼而，該模式被應(yīng)用于對(duì)不同間接性語(yǔ)言現(xiàn)象的分析，以檢驗(yàn)其解釋力。進(jìn)而，本文將言外轉(zhuǎn)喻中涉及的一些操作領(lǐng)域—轉(zhuǎn)喻連接力度和場(chǎng)境，都統(tǒng)一在屬性操作模式當(dāng)中。這一章內(nèi)描寫(xiě)了外因素如語(yǔ)境、社會(huì)文化等因素的影響作用，，意圖說(shuō)明屬性操作中的突變現(xiàn)象與語(yǔ)境等因素的協(xié)商性，補(bǔ)充原言外轉(zhuǎn)喻中的部分空白。 第六章結(jié)論部分提出了本文的優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)。本研究立足言外轉(zhuǎn)喻屬性說(shuō)法的具體操作層面，通過(guò)對(duì)類屬思維慣勢(shì)的合理性論證，補(bǔ)充修正了原整合理論中的類屬空間操作不明的問(wèn)題，以及整合程序不明的問(wèn)題。在此基礎(chǔ)上，提出并確立的言外轉(zhuǎn)喻解釋間接言語(yǔ)行為是屬性操作模式，該模式既可以用于原社會(huì)常規(guī)性言外轉(zhuǎn)喻解釋，更進(jìn)一步地可以用于非常規(guī)轉(zhuǎn)喻的解釋方面。這是一個(gè)基于原模式且高于原屬性說(shuō)法的具體可行的操作方案。
[Abstract]:Panther, Thornburg (1998:756) points out the two shortcomings of the traditional reasoning theory: (1) the traditional reasoning theory fails to explain the fact that the hearer usually makes no effort to make pragmatic inference; (2) the traditional theory can not explain the related reasoning mode and the cognitive basis systematically.
This study takes the core hypothesis of the metonymy as the starting point - the attribute of speech act from the meaning to the speech act itself, the speech act to its attribute (Panther, 2004:103-104). Based on the nature of the attribute operation, the aim is to learn from the integration theory and the psychological model in other fields of linguistics, from the listener. On the basis of reading angle, the macro mechanism of the metonymy operation is improved. On this basis, the "attribute strengthening Association" model is proposed to explain the micro manipulation of the metonymy. Compared with the original attribute hypothesis, it has a stronger explanatory power to the speech phenomenon and has a higher maneuverability compared with the existing metonymy inference mechanism. In brief, the core of this article is mainly two parts: the construction of the attribute strengthening association model and the systematic analysis of the metonymy.
The first chapter puts forward the research background, motivation, purpose, hypothesis and method and so on. The second chapter makes a brief introduction to the contribution, deficiency and reference of metonymy theory on the basis of literature review. The third chapter is a preliminary preparation for the construction of the subordinate mode of operation and the model of the attribute model. To provide theoretical support, on the one hand, it is necessary to ensure that the models to be constructed can effectively supplement and improve the existing problems of the existing metonymy reasoning, and provide sufficient theoretical supply for the fundamental concept of the simplest interpretation scheme of attribute reasoning, on the other hand, the overall frame and concrete steps of the property operation, and other specific constraints, and other specific constraints. The operation provides material.
On the basis of the previous chapters, the fourth chapter formally puts forward the operation mode of the metonymy attribute, and makes a justification for the development track and application trend of the metonymy theory, revising and perfecting the operating procedures of the category and the integrated space of the integration theory, and points out that the class space is the transfer. The necessity of the operation of the metaphor is not dispensable, and the integration is the two operation of the class genus, making a detailed explanation of the specific operation of the attributes in each space, thus establishing the fundamental idea that the reasoning is a cognitive pragmatic perspective, and the hearer's angle of view is to use attribute induction to strengthen the causal procedure of association.
Then, the model is applied to the analysis of different indirect linguistic phenomena in order to test its explanatory power. Then, in this paper, some of the operational areas involved in the metonymy, the dynamics of metonymy connection and the field, are unified in the mode of attribute operation. In this chapter, the influence of factors such as context, social culture and other factors is described in this chapter. It explains the negotiability of the abrupt phenomena in the attribute operation and the factors such as context, and supplements some blanks in the original metonymy.
The sixth chapter puts forward the advantages and disadvantages of this article. This study is based on the specific operation level of the attribute statement of the metonymy. Through the reasonableness demonstration of the thinking habit of class and genus, the problem of unknown class space operation in the original integration theory and the unclear integration procedure are supplemented. On this basis, the words are put forward and established. The indirect speech act of metonymy interpretation is an attribute operation mode, which can be used not only in the original social conventional metonymy interpretation, but also for the interpretation of the unconventional metonymy. This is a concrete and feasible operation based on the original model and higher than the original attribute.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：哈爾濱理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：H030

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鄒春玲;李軼男;;黑話的自主—依存模式解讀[J];邊疆經(jīng)濟(jì)與文化;2010年08期

2 鄒春玲;李丹;;轉(zhuǎn)喻識(shí)解的認(rèn)知語(yǔ)用機(jī)制分析[J];邊疆經(jīng)濟(jì)與文化;2010年09期

3 鄒春玲;梁英吉;;概念隱喻理論和概念整合理論的相容性探究[J];東北農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年03期

4 蔡暉;徐鳳云;;轉(zhuǎn)喻思維本源性的初步論證[J];國(guó)外社會(huì)科學(xué);2009年01期

5 張娜;鄒春玲;;認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)中的轉(zhuǎn)喻闡述[J];黑龍江科技信息;2010年01期

6 鄒春玲;劉暢;;基于模型的會(huì)話含意的生成[J];商業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年18期

7 鄒春玲;于淑凡;;詩(shī)詞中的隱喻[J];商業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年05期

8 鄒春玲;陳紅軍;;歇后語(yǔ)生成和識(shí)解的認(rèn)知機(jī)制[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2009年36期

9 鄒春玲;胡改娟;;反語(yǔ)的生成和理解機(jī)制[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2010年01期

10 鄒春玲;;外延內(nèi)涵傳承與類-屬思維[J];當(dāng)代外語(yǔ)研究;2010年12期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 胡方芳;現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)轉(zhuǎn)喻的認(rèn)知研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2008年

2 楊子;言語(yǔ)交際的關(guān)聯(lián)優(yōu)選模式及其應(yīng)用[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2008年

本文編號(hào)：2164303