本文選題：整體部分關系 + 概念整合��； 參考：《華中師范大學》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：N+N復合名詞在英漢中都非常普遍,尤其在漢語復合名詞中所占比例很可觀。根據(jù)認知語言學的觀點,語言世界是主觀世界對現(xiàn)實世界的反映,本文立足于整體與部分關系,考察二者在名名復合詞中的語義表現(xiàn)。通過研究發(fā)現(xiàn),現(xiàn)實世界中的整體與部分在漢語中主要通過名名復合詞來體現(xiàn),且具有普遍性,說明語言符號的組合規(guī)則與客觀世界存在象似點。 本文主要從四個方面展開對整體部分概念合成詞的研究,全文共分為六個部分。 第一章是緒論。介紹了研究目的和意義、研究對象和方法以及研究現(xiàn)狀。本文從語言形式入手,深究名名復合詞內(nèi)部的整體與部分關系,驗證語言與現(xiàn)實的象似性。主要運用語義語法及認知語言學等理論,對整體部分關系復合名詞進行了詳盡細膩的語義分析和句法分析,并提出了這一高頻組合的認知理據(jù)。 第二章分析漢語中整體與部分整合的方式,主要有“整體+部分”和“部分+整體”兩種方式。前者整個結構的語義指向部分,后者整個結構的語義指向整體。同時,比較漢英表達整體部分關系的異同,英語的表達方式更豐富。 第三章探討整體與部分的語義特點,從語義關系、范疇特征、語義突顯、語義結構等方面進行論述。整體與部分的語義關系體現(xiàn)在物體與構件、生產(chǎn)者與被生產(chǎn)者、容器與容物。整體部分合成詞是由分別指稱整體和部分的基本層次范疇合成的下位范疇,語義中心居右。 第四章分析整體部分概念合成詞的結構特點。整體部分復合名詞屬于定中偏正結構,能夠單獨出現(xiàn)在主語、賓語、定語和中心語等句法位置上,具有名詞的5項優(yōu)勢分布,而且整體部分復合名詞與部分整體復合名詞二者在語法分布上沒有多大差別。從名量搭配來看,絕大部分整體部分關系復合名詞能與不定量詞、種類量詞、成形量詞、個體量詞等結合,而與集體量詞、度量詞、容器量詞的組合能力相對較弱。 第五章解釋整體部分概念整合的認知理據(jù)。從語義合成機制和思維差異兩方面進行闡述。整體部分圖式是整體部分概念實現(xiàn)語義壓制的基礎,認知突顯是實現(xiàn)語義壓制的途徑。不同民族采用不同的形式來表達整體部分關系。 最后一章是結語�？偨Y了本文的主要觀點,并指出本文研究的不足之處。
[Abstract]:N N compound nouns are very common in English and Chinese, especially in Chinese compound nouns. According to the viewpoint of cognitive linguistics, the linguistic world is the reflection of the subjective world to the real world. Through the study, it is found that the whole and part of the real world in Chinese are mainly reflected by nominal-noun compound words, and they are universal, which shows that the combination rules of language symbols and the objective world have similar points. In this paper, the whole part of the conceptual composition of the study from four aspects, the full text is divided into six parts. The first chapter is the introduction. This paper introduces the purpose and significance of the research, the research object and method, and the present situation of the research. Starting with the linguistic form, this paper probes into the whole and part relations of the noun compound and verifies the iconicity between language and reality. Based on the theories of semantic grammar and cognitive linguistics, this paper makes a detailed and detailed semantic analysis and syntactic analysis of the whole partial relation compound nouns, and puts forward the cognitive motivation of this high frequency combination. The second chapter analyzes the integration of the whole and the part in Chinese, mainly in two ways: the whole part and the partial whole. The former refers to the whole structure and the latter to the whole. At the same time, comparing the similarities and differences of the whole relationship between Chinese and English, the expression of English is more abundant. The third chapter discusses the semantic characteristics of the whole and part, including semantic relations, category characteristics, semantic salience, semantic structure and so on. The semantic relationship between whole and part is embodied in objects and components, producers and producers, containers and contents. The whole part compound word is the lower category which is composed of the basic category of the whole and the part respectively, and the semantic center is on the right. The fourth chapter analyzes the structural characteristics of the whole part of the conceptual compound word. The whole part of compound nouns belong to the fixed and positive structure and can appear separately in the syntactic positions such as subject, object, attributive and central language, which have five superior distributions of nouns. Moreover, there is not much difference in grammatical distribution between the whole part compound noun and the partial whole compound noun. From the point of view of nominal-quantity collocation, most of the whole part-relation compound nouns can be combined with indefinite classifiers, category classifiers, formative classifiers, individual classifiers, and so on, but the combination ability with collective classifiers, metric words and container classifiers is relatively weak. The fifth chapter explains the cognitive motivation of the integration of the whole part of the concept. This paper expounds the mechanism of semantic composition and the difference of thinking. The whole part schema is the foundation of the whole part concept to realize semantic suppression, and the cognitive salience is the way to realize the semantic suppression. Different ethnic groups adopt different forms to express the whole partial relationship. The last chapter is the conclusion. This paper summarizes the main points of view, and points out the shortcomings of this study.
【學位授予單位】：華中師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：H04

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 李衛(wèi)榮;;英語整體-部分領屬表達的變化及與漢語的對比[J];安陽工學院學報;2010年05期

2 符淮青;表名物詞義項劃分的一些問題[J];辭書研究;1993年03期

3 李宇明;整體與部分同詞現(xiàn)象及其認知理據(jù)[J];漢語學習;2002年02期

4 董秀芳;;整體與部分關系在漢語詞匯系統(tǒng)中的表現(xiàn)及在漢語句法中的突顯性[J];世界漢語教學;2009年04期

5 馮勝利;漢語韻律句法學引論(下)[J];學術界;2000年02期

6 沈家煊;句法的象似性問題[J];外語教學與研究;1993年01期

7 石定栩;;限制性定語和描寫性定語[J];外語教學與研究;2010年05期

8 劉正光,劉潤清;N+N概念合成名詞的認知發(fā)生機制[J];外國語(上海外國語大學學報);2004年01期

9 劉寧生;;漢語怎樣表達物體的空間關系[J];中國語文;1994年03期

10 袁毓林;;一價名詞的認知研究[J];中國語文;1994年04期

，

本文編號：1841507