本文選題：留學生 + 句法�。� 參考：《語言教學與研究》2013年02期

【摘要】：本文采用句法判斷和修改任務,考察了不同漢語水平及不同國家留學生對狀語、定語和補語等不同句法錯誤的認知難度。結果發(fā)現:(1)學生的句法判斷和修改成績受到句法錯誤類型的影響。狀語錯誤的修改成績好于定語錯誤,定語錯誤修改成績好于補語錯誤;初、中級學生成績的差異主要表現在定語和補語錯誤的判斷上。(2)學生錯誤判斷的成績好于錯誤修改成績。(3)馬來西亞學生狀語和定語修改成績沒有差異,明顯好于補語成績;而韓國學生則呈現出明顯的階梯性變化的趨勢,狀語修改成績好于定語修改成績,而定語修改成績又好于補語成績。不同國家的學生既表現了學習的共性也表現了各自的特性。
[Abstract]:Using the task of syntactic judgment and modification, this paper investigates the cognitive difficulties of different syntactic errors such as adverbials, attributives and complements among foreign students from different countries and different levels of Chinese.It was found that the syntactic judgment and revision scores of the students were influenced by the types of syntactic errors.The correction of adverbial errors is better than that of attributive errors, and the modification of attributive errors is better than that of complement errors.The difference of middle level students' scores mainly shows in the judgment of attributive and complement errors. 2) the students' wrong judgment results are better than that of wrong revision scores. 3) there is no difference in the scores of adverbial and attributive modification of Malaysian students, which is obviously better than that of complement.The Korean students showed an obvious trend of ladder change, the adverbial revision score was better than the attributive revision score, and the attributive revision score was better than the complement score.Students from different countries not only show the commonness of learning, but also show their own characteristics.
【作者單位】： 北京外國語大學中國語言文學學院;
【分類號】：H195

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前8條

1 馬黎華;;語言標記性研究的回顧與思考[J];浙江海洋學院學報(人文科學版);2010年03期

2 施家煒;;外國留學生22類現代漢語句式的習得順序研究[J];世界漢語教學;1998年04期

3 肖奚強;;韓國學生漢語語法偏誤分析[J];世界漢語教學;2000年02期

4 周小兵;;學習難度的測定和考察[J];世界漢語教學;2004年01期

5 周小兵;;非母語者漢語語法偏誤研究程序[J];云南師范大學學報(對外漢語教學與研究版);2009年01期

6 劉s，

本文編號：1746462