本文選題：漢語 + 歧義句��； 參考：《西北民族大學》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著現(xiàn)代科學技術(shù)的進步和先進儀器的出現(xiàn),有關(guān)語義理解加工的研究也開始從單一的平面語法研究轉(zhuǎn)向借助各種信號采集設(shè)備,從生理角度開展語言學的相關(guān)研究。本文采用事件相關(guān)電位(Event-related Potentials, ERP)的技術(shù)手段,對有關(guān)漢語歧義句理解的腦電信號加以研究,通過對原始腦電信號進行處理、分析,借助潛伏期、幅值、等重要ERP參數(shù)來探索大腦的語言加工機制。 本文論述了有關(guān)漢語歧義現(xiàn)象的研究現(xiàn)狀,闡述了本文的研究理論基礎(chǔ)和方法,詳細介紹了有關(guān)ERP技術(shù)的原理、研究方法、主要成分、在語言研究中取得的成果和有關(guān)本文研究的具體實驗方案設(shè)計。 同時在第四、五、六章中,基于ERP研究的基本參數(shù)和研究方式,先后分析研究了大腦對于cl、yy和jf三類歧義句在判斷理解過程中顯示出的生理活動特征。研究從左額區(qū)、右額區(qū)以及枕區(qū)三方面展開,同時關(guān)注Q信號和FQ信號的差異。通過研究發(fā)現(xiàn),在大腦對漢語歧義句理解加工的過程中,Q信號和FQ信號在左額區(qū)都會出現(xiàn)P300,且Q信號的P300峰值明顯大于FQ信號；右額區(qū)Q信號和FQ信號都會出現(xiàn)N200,且Q信號在N200之后還有出現(xiàn)和語義加工相關(guān)的N400;在枕區(qū),Q信號和FQ信號趨勢相似,但男女被試組間,在波形的走向和峰值出現(xiàn)的時間上各有不同�；诰唧w參數(shù)的考量和比對,本文認為對于歧義句理解的大腦加工活動,在時間進程上,體現(xiàn)出來的是一個從視覺加工到語音加工,再到語義加工的相互融合的過程：同時,基于本文的研究內(nèi)容和研究結(jié)果,發(fā)現(xiàn)大腦在漢語歧義句理解的過程中,jf-3和yy-1類型的歧義句相對較難,而yy-2和c1類型的歧義句比較容易。 通過對有關(guān)三種類型的漢語歧義句大腦理解的研究,本文為進一步弄清有關(guān)語言的腦加工機制問題提供了詳盡的材料,同時也為今后更加深入地開展有關(guān)基于生理角度的語言研究進行了有意義的探索。
[Abstract]:With the development of modern science and technology and the appearance of advanced instruments, the research on semantic understanding and processing is beginning to shift from the single plane grammar research to the use of various signal acquisition devices to carry out the relevant research in linguistics from the physiological point of view.In this paper, Event-related potentials (ERPs) are used to study the EEG signals related to the understanding of Chinese ambiguous sentences. The original EEG signals are processed, analyzed, and the latencies and amplitudes are used.And other important ERP parameters to explore the brain language processing mechanism.This paper discusses the current situation of research on Chinese ambiguity, expounds the theoretical basis and methods of this paper, and introduces in detail the principle, research methods and main components of ERP technology.The results obtained in the language research and the specific experimental design of this study.At the same time, in the fourth, fifth and sixth chapters, based on the basic parameters and research methods of ERP research, we analyze and study the physiological activities of the brain in the process of judging and understanding three kinds of ambiguous sentences: clawy and JF.The study was carried out from the left frontal region, right frontal area and occipital region, while paying attention to the difference between Q signal and FQ signal.It is found that both the Q signal and the FQ signal appear in the left frontal region in the process of understanding and processing Chinese ambiguous sentences, and the peak value of P300 of Q signal is obviously larger than that of FQ signal.The right frontal area Q signal and FQ signal both appeared N200, and Q signal also appeared N400 related to semantic processing after N200. In occipital area Q signal and FQ signal trend was similar, but between male and female subjects,There are differences in the direction of the waveform and the time when the peak occurs.Based on the consideration and comparison of specific parameters, this paper holds that the brain processing of ambiguous sentence comprehension is a process of fusion from visual processing to phonological processing and semantic processing in the process of time: at the same time,Based on the research contents and results of this paper, it is found that it is relatively difficult for the brain to understand the ambiguous sentences of jf-3 and yy-1 types, while the ambiguous sentences of yy-2 and C1 types are easier to understand in the process of comprehension of Chinese ambiguous sentences.Through the study of three types of Chinese ambiguous sentence brain understanding, this paper provides detailed materials for further understanding the brain processing mechanism of language.At the same time, it also makes a meaningful exploration for the further research of physiological angle-based language.
【學位授予單位】：西北民族大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：H146

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 戴黎剛;現(xiàn)代漢語歧義研究述評[J];北方論叢;2004年03期

2 宋偉;;ERP研究原則及其成分[J];重慶科技學院學報(自然科學版);2007年02期

3 李漢威,黃春珍;運用三個平面的理論研究漢語歧義現(xiàn)象[J];江漢大學學報;2001年01期

4 董瑞國,孫相如,高素榮;采用事件相關(guān)電位研究漢字的識別過程——基于形音義的初步研究[J];臨床神經(jīng)科學;1996年04期

5 付建秀;;淺析漢語歧義句的深層結(jié)構(gòu)[J];遼寧教育行政學院學報;2006年09期

6 項成東;歧義的認知機制[J];四川外語學院學報;2003年04期

7 張維鼎;歧義的心理認知研究[J];山東外語教學;1996年02期

8 常欣;王沛;;句子加工:句法違例與語義違例范式下的ERP研究述評[J];外語教學與研究;2007年01期

9 劉濤;楊亦鳴;趙侖;張珊珊;張強;;應(yīng)用事件相關(guān)電位技術(shù)考察正常人名詞和動詞的腦區(qū)分布特征[J];中國組織工程研究與臨床康復;2007年31期

10 耿立波;于亮;張珊珊;楊亦鳴;;應(yīng)用事件相關(guān)電位技術(shù)考察雙語理解中內(nèi)隱加工與外顯加工的互補[J];中國組織工程研究與臨床康復;2008年30期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前2條

1 于曉日;現(xiàn)代漢語歧義句功能研究[D];南京師范大學;2005年

2 趙穎;現(xiàn)代漢語歧義研究新探[D];黑龍江大學;2007年

，

本文編號：1741872