仿擬的認(rèn)知語用闡釋
本文選題:仿擬 切入點(diǎn):關(guān)聯(lián)理論 出處:《西北師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文
【摘要】:仿擬作為一種為了表現(xiàn)新的內(nèi)容而對(duì)原有的語言形式進(jìn)行改造的語言手段,如今越來越廣泛地被報(bào)紙,雜志,電視等多種傳播媒體使用。類似像短語“隨心所‘浴’”,“Give me green world, orgive me yesterday”在我們的日常生活和閱讀中隨處可見。之前對(duì)各種仿擬現(xiàn)象的研究大多停留在修辭層面上,而本文將以認(rèn)知語言學(xué)中的兩大支柱性理論---結(jié)合概念整合理論和認(rèn)知關(guān)聯(lián)理論來全方位解讀仿擬語。 本文采用定性研究的方法,通過觀察,從在線和離線材料中選取35個(gè)典型仿擬實(shí)例作為研究樣本。具體來講,本文結(jié)合Sperber和Wilson的關(guān)聯(lián)理論和Fauconnier概念整合理論,提出了一個(gè)整合處理空間來全面分析仿擬語,探索三種類型的仿擬生成和解讀的機(jī)制。 在這個(gè)工作網(wǎng)絡(luò)中,理解仿擬的第一步是交際者將交際意圖以言語刺激明示給對(duì)方;讀者在這一明示行為刺激下進(jìn)行推理。通過推理讀者先從認(rèn)知語境中選取與交際意圖最相關(guān)的信息,然后對(duì)這些信息作出一系列假設(shè)并進(jìn)行修正調(diào)整,最終獲取互顯假設(shè)。然后再依據(jù)概念整合理論,借用跨空間映射和合成對(duì)語用推理的心理認(rèn)知過程進(jìn)行詳細(xì)的論述。在概念整合過程中來自輸入空間的結(jié)構(gòu)或元素被投射到類屬空間及整合空間,并由在關(guān)聯(lián)理論為統(tǒng)帥原則的處理過程中完成語義的組合及完善進(jìn)而擴(kuò)展生成一個(gè)輸入空間中并不存在的新顯結(jié)構(gòu)即層創(chuàng)結(jié)構(gòu),從而交際者的交際意圖與仿擬的預(yù)期效果成功地被讀者所理解,完成了仿擬的認(rèn)知語用闡釋。本文還討論了理解仿擬時(shí)的兩個(gè)干擾因素,以及成功解讀交際意圖所需的認(rèn)知努力。 在關(guān)聯(lián)理論和概念整合理論的框架下,通過對(duì)仿擬的具體分析和討論,本文對(duì)仿擬的認(rèn)知解讀提供了一個(gè)較合理的整合網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu),并且在一定程度上豐富了關(guān)聯(lián)理論和認(rèn)知理論尤其是概念整合理論的解釋力,同時(shí),概念整合理論彌補(bǔ)了關(guān)聯(lián)理論在語用推理的具體心理操作方面的不足,另外,,本文對(duì)于人們能更好的應(yīng)用和理解仿擬也有十分重要的意義。
[Abstract]:Parody, as a means of transforming the original language form in order to express new content, is becoming more and more widely used in newspapers and magazines. Television and other communication media are used. Similar phrases like "Give me green world, orgive me yesterday" are widely used in our daily life and reading. In this paper, the two pillar theories in cognitive linguistics are combined with conceptual integration theory and cognitive relevance theory to interpret parody in all directions. In this paper, 35 typical imitation examples from online and offline materials are selected as the research samples by using qualitative research methods. Specifically, the relevance theory of Sperber and Wilson and the Fauconnier conceptual integration theory are combined in this paper. An integrated processing space is proposed to analyze parody comprehensively and explore the mechanism of three types of parody generation and interpretation. In this work network, the first step in understanding parody is that the communicator expresses the communicative intention to the other party with verbal stimulation. The reader inferences under the stimulus of this explicit behavior. By reasoning, the reader selects the information most relevant to the communicative intention from the cognitive context, and then makes a series of hypotheses and modifies the information. Finally, the hypothesis of mutual demonstration is obtained, and then based on the theory of conceptual integration, The psychological cognitive process of pragmatic reasoning is discussed in detail by using cross-spatial mapping and synthesis. In the process of conceptual integration, the structure or elements from input space are projected to the generic space and the integration space. And by completing the semantic combination and perfection in the process of dealing with the principle of relevance theory as the commander-in-chief, a new explicit structure, that is, the layer creation structure, which does not exist in the input space, is generated. As a result, the communicative intention and the expected effect of parody are successfully understood by the reader, and the cognitive pragmatic interpretation of parody is completed. The paper also discusses the two interfering factors in the comprehension of parody. And the cognitive effort needed to successfully interpret the communicative intention. Under the framework of relevance Theory and Conceptual Integration Theory, through the concrete analysis and discussion of parody, this paper provides a reasonable integrated network structure for cognitive interpretation of parody. To a certain extent, it enriches the explanatory power of relevance theory and cognitive theory, especially conceptual integration theory. At the same time, conceptual integration theory makes up for the deficiency of relevance theory in the specific psychological operation of pragmatic reasoning. This paper also has very important significance for people to be able to better apply and understand parody.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:西北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類號(hào)】:H05
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陳慶漢;;論廣告語言創(chuàng)作對(duì)成語的超常規(guī)運(yùn)用[J];常熟理工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年05期
2 羅勝杰;;英漢廣告中的仿擬研究[J];湖南工程學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年01期
3 羅勝杰;;相關(guān)理論在仿擬構(gòu)成中的運(yùn)用[J];懷化學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期
4 余夕仁,李宇明;試析廣告中雙解成語變異[J];漢語學(xué)習(xí);1997年01期
5 白紅愛,鄭成虎;從認(rèn)知角度談漢語廣告語篇中對(duì)固化成語的偏離使用[J];漢語學(xué)習(xí);2001年03期
6 王玉哲;;橫組合與縱聚合關(guān)系理論對(duì)仿擬的解釋[J];河南教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年01期
7 劉宇紅;謝亞軍;;從構(gòu)式語法看漢語成語的仿用[J];解放軍外國(guó)語學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年06期
8 魏曉茹;;論仿擬辭格的語用功能及語境干擾[J];洛陽師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期
9 么孝穎;;從圖形-背景理論看仿擬修辭格生成的認(rèn)知本質(zhì)[J];外語研究;2007年04期
10 劉宇紅;心理空間理論與詞匯歧義[J];外語學(xué)刊;2002年01期
本文編號(hào):1694368
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/1694368.html