【摘要】： 現(xiàn)實(shí)中，不斷出現(xiàn)城市雕塑作品著作權(quán)侵權(quán)糾紛，現(xiàn)階段著作權(quán)理論上專門探討城市雕塑作品合理使用問題還比較少，在司法實(shí)踐也出現(xiàn)機(jī)械照搬法條的審判結(jié)果。因此研究城市雕塑作品合理使用問題就具有了現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。 本文從城市雕塑作品的概念出發(fā)，發(fā)掘出其不同于一般作品的特點(diǎn)，同時(shí)分析司法實(shí)踐中由于對(duì)城市雕塑作品合理使用理解的僵化導(dǎo)致的不合理判決結(jié)果。再借助洛克的財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)勞動(dòng)理論、盧梭的社會(huì)契約理論、馬克思的勞動(dòng)價(jià)值論去分析知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的正當(dāng)性，清楚認(rèn)識(shí)到知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的邊界是如何被劃分的，，以此明晰合理使用制度建立的理念，從而把握如何界定合理使用范圍。最后得出城市雕塑作品合理使用范圍正確界定方式。
[Abstract]:In reality, there are more and more disputes on copyright infringement of urban sculpture works. At the present stage, there are few problems about the rational use of urban sculpture works in the copyright theory, and the judicial results of mechanically copying the articles of law also appear in the judicial practice. Therefore, it is of practical significance to study the rational use of urban sculpture works. Starting from the concept of urban sculpture works, this paper finds out its characteristics which are different from common works, and analyzes the unreasonable judgment results caused by the ossification of the rational use of urban sculpture works in judicial practice. With the help of Locke's labor theory of property right, Rousseau's theory of social contract and Marx's theory of labor value, the legitimacy of intellectual property is analyzed, and the boundary of intellectual property is clearly recognized. In order to clarify the concept of the establishment of rational use system, so as to grasp how to define the scope of rational use. Finally, the reasonable use range of urban sculpture works is defined correctly.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：暨南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類號(hào)】：D913

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 徐婷婷;雕塑作品的工業(yè)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2009年

本文編號(hào)：2405110