漢學(xué)家譯者在中國典籍外譯的進(jìn)程中扮演了重要角色,倪豪士(1943～)作為當(dāng)今美國漢學(xué)界的著名學(xué)者之一,主要從事中國古典文學(xué)研究,并翻譯了大量中國經(jīng)典著作,對中國文化對外傳播發(fā)揮了重要作用。其中,倪豪士領(lǐng)銜的《史記》全譯項(xiàng)目尤為學(xué)界所關(guān)注,其譯本因?qū)W術(shù)性較強(qiáng)的特質(zhì)得到了廣泛好評。隨著翻譯研究的文化轉(zhuǎn)向,譯者研究逐漸成為翻譯研究的重點(diǎn)。譯者的身份對其文本選擇、翻譯策略及風(fēng)格具有重要影響,倪豪士既是一名漢學(xué)家譯者,同時(shí)又是一名漢學(xué)教師,其豐富的學(xué)術(shù)研究成果、嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)?shù)慕虒W(xué)活動(dòng)與翻譯行為相輔相成。本文從周領(lǐng)順提出的譯者行為批評視角出發(fā),結(jié)合翻譯內(nèi)與翻譯外兩個(gè)視域,對倪豪士的不同身份進(jìn)行考察,探究其在《史記》英譯中呈現(xiàn)的特征及影響。本研究通過文本細(xì)讀和文本對比分析的方法,以楊憲益、戴乃迭夫婦的《史記》譯本為參照,結(jié)合“求真-務(wù)實(shí)”連續(xù)統(tǒng)評價(jià)模式,對倪豪士不同身份下的行為進(jìn)行考察。依據(jù)譯者行為批評理論,具體分為以下兩個(gè)角度,倪豪士作為語言人,如何使其譯文求真于《史記》原文;倪豪士作為社會人,如何使其譯文務(wù)實(shí)于社會。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),作為語言人,倪豪士的身份可具體為《史記》的讀者與譯者,其教育背景為其深刻解讀原...

【文章頁數(shù)】：71 頁

【學(xué)位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
ABSTRACT
摘要
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION
    1.1 Research background
    1.2 Research questions
    1.3 Thesis statement
    1.4 Research significance
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW
    2.1 Previous studies on translator’s identity
        2.1.1 Studies abroad
        2.1.2 Studies in China
    2.2 Previous studies on Nienhauser’s translation of Shih chi
        2.2.1 Studies abroad
        2.2.2 Studies in China
    2.3 Translator behavior criticism theory and the previous studies
        2.3.1 Introduction of translator behavior criticism
        2.3.2 Two perspectives of translator behavior criticism
        2.3.3 Truth-seeking-Utility-attaining evaluative model of continuum
        2.3.4 Studies on translator behavior criticism
CHAPTER THREE ANALYSIS OF NIENHAUSER’S IDENTITIES UNDER THETRUTH-SEEKING-UTILITY-ATTAINING EVALUATIVE MODEL OFCONTINUUM
    3.1 Nienhauser as a linguistic being from the intra-translation perspective
        3.1.1 Nienhauser as a reader of Shih chi
        3.1.2 Nienhauser as a translator of Shih chi
        3.1.3 High degree of truth-seeking as a linguistic being
    3.2 Nienhauser as a social being from the extra-translation perspective
        3.2.1 Nienhauser as a researcher of Shih chi
        3.2.2 Nienhauser as a teacher of Chinese classics
        3.2.3 High degree of utility-attaining as a social being
CHAPTER FOUR CONCLUSION
    4.1 Research necessities and contents
    4.2 Major findings and implications
    4.3 Research limitations and suggestions for future research
REFERENCES



本文編號：3808082