本文選題：拴驢泉石門銘 + 石門��； 參考：《中國典籍與文化》2017年03期

【摘要】：近幾年陸續(xù)發(fā)表了幾篇專門討論三國曹魏拴驢泉石門銘的文章,其中以《文物》2016年第6期發(fā)表的《三國曹魏〈拴驢泉石門銘〉考補》(由郭洪義與毛遠明兩位先生合寫)一文最為晚出。但是,這篇文章在疏解拴驢泉石門銘中主要詞語以及相關(guān)問題時出現(xiàn)不少錯誤。我們對這些詞語及相關(guān)問題作了進一步的考察,也分析了導(dǎo)致錯誤的原因。
[Abstract]:In recent years, several articles have been published devoted to the discussion of the inscriptions of the three Kingdoms, Cao Wei, Chao Wei, Donkey Quan, and Shimen. Among them, the sixth issue of "Cultural relics", published in the sixth issue of 2016, "Cao Wei", "Shimen inscription on tied Donkey Quan" (co-authored by Guo Hongyi and Mao Yuanming), was the last one to be published. However, there are many mistakes in this article in dissolving the main words and related problems in the stone inscription of Donkey Quan. We made a further study of these words and related problems, and analyzed the causes of the errors.
【作者單位】： 復(fù)旦大學(xué)出土文獻與古文字研究中心;
【基金】：“2011計劃”出土文獻與中國古代文明研究協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心博士創(chuàng)新資助項目“漢簡名物研究”(編號:CTWX2016BS008)的資助
【分類號】：G256
，

本文編號：1972739