本文選題：《四庫(kù)全書總目》 + 《中國(guó)叢書綜錄》�。� 參考：《天津師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：古典目錄學(xué)的類目設(shè)置由早期"六分法"到正統(tǒng)"四分法"經(jīng)歷了漫長(zhǎng)的發(fā)展過(guò)程。其中,清乾隆時(shí)期編纂的大型官修目錄《四庫(kù)全書總目》(以下簡(jiǎn)稱為《總目》)成為中國(guó)古代目錄學(xué)的巔峰之作。建國(guó)后,國(guó)家陸續(xù)編修了各類大型古籍叢刊,《中國(guó)叢書綜錄》(以下簡(jiǎn)稱為《綜錄》)作為首批代表之一,其對(duì)"四分法"類目的改進(jìn)和革新意義非凡。本文通過(guò)比較《總目》與《綜錄》類目的異同,總結(jié)二者的優(yōu)劣得失,對(duì)新時(shí)期古典目錄學(xué)的發(fā)展略陳管見(jiàn)。首先,簡(jiǎn)述《總目》與《綜錄》的概況及二者的類目特色,點(diǎn)明其在編例規(guī)范、提要內(nèi)容、類目次第、子目細(xì)化等多方面的特征。其次,列表對(duì)比兩書的類目設(shè)置情況,概括二者在經(jīng)、史、子、集四部分類的差異�？芍毒C錄》較《總目》有以下幾點(diǎn)重要變化:新增六類,為讖緯類、史表類、周秦諸子類、工藝類、典故類、其他宗教類;分化五類,其中禮類一分為四、春秋類一分為五、爾雅類從小學(xué)類分離、金石類從目錄類分離、道教類從道家類分離;職官類、詔令奏議類、政書類三者合為政書一類;更名六類,其中書類改為尚書類、詩(shī)類改為詩(shī)經(jīng)類、五經(jīng)總義類改為群經(jīng)總義類、兵家類改為兵書類、天文算法類改為歷算類、釋家類改為佛教類。再次,對(duì)二級(jí)類目的變化進(jìn)行分類說(shuō)明。通過(guò)梳理《中經(jīng)新簿》《崇文總目》等官修目錄,《漢志》《隋志》《舊唐志》《新唐志》《宋志》《明志》等史志目錄,《郡齋讀書志》《直齋書錄解題》《遂初堂書目》《文獻(xiàn)通考·經(jīng)籍考》《千頃堂書目》《書目答問(wèn)》《販書偶記》等私家目錄的類目設(shè)置,根據(jù)各書的序言案語(yǔ),分析差異類目的源流發(fā)展。同時(shí)對(duì)比建國(guó)后多部大型古籍書目的類目改進(jìn)情況,評(píng)價(jià)《綜錄》對(duì)《總目》類目并省增益的合理性,探尋新時(shí)期古典目錄學(xué)的發(fā)展及變革過(guò)程。最后,宏觀總結(jié)《綜錄》的類目改進(jìn)情況,闡述兩書的目錄學(xué)價(jià)值及影響�？偠灾�,本文通過(guò)探尋《綜錄》對(duì)《總目》類目的改良,展示現(xiàn)代文化對(duì)于古典目錄學(xué)的傳承與創(chuàng)新。
[Abstract]:The category setting of classical bibliography has gone through a long process from the early six-cent method to the orthodox four-part method. In the Qianlong period of Qing Dynasty, the large official repair catalogue "Siku" (hereafter referred to as "General catalogue") became the peak of ancient Chinese bibliography. After the founding of the people's Republic of China, the country successively edited various kinds of large-scale ancient books series, and the Chinese Series of Comprehensive Books (hereinafter referred to as "the Comprehensive Records") as one of the first batch of representatives, it is of special significance to the improvement and innovation of the category of "four methods". By comparing the similarities and differences between the categories of "General catalogue" and "Comprehensive record", this paper summarizes their merits and demerits, and gives some views on the development of classical bibliography in the new period. First of all, the general situation of "General item" and "Comprehensive record" and their classification characteristics are briefly described, and the characteristics of their specifications in compiling examples, the contents of the summary, the subcategories, and the refinement of the subcategories are pointed out. Secondly, this paper compares the two books' category setting, and summarizes the differences between them in four parts: classics, history, subsets and sets. We can see that there are the following important changes in "Comprehensive Records": six new categories, namely, prophecy, history, Zhou and Qin, craft, allusions, other religions, and differentiation, of which one is divided into four categories, one is divided into four categories, and the other is divided into five categories. Erya is separated from primary school, gold and stone from catalogue, Taoism from Taoism; official, imperial edict, and political book are classified as political type; and six types are renamed, of which the calligraphy is changed to the Shang Shu, and the poem to the Book of songs. The general sense of the five Classics was changed into the general sense of the Group Classics, the class of soldiers changed to the class of military books, the class of astronomical algorithms was changed into the category of calendars, and the category of Buddhism was changed into the category of Buddhism. Thirdly, the change of the second-level category is explained. By combing through the catalogue of historical records such as "Central Classic New Book" and "Chongwen General catalogue", "Han Zhi" < Sui Zhi > < Old Tang Zhi > < New Tang Zhi > < Song Zhi > < Ming Zhi > and other historical chronicles, "Jiangui Zhai Reading Chronicles" < Zhi Zhai Book record and explanation problem > < Sui Chu Tang Bibliography > < Literature General examination The categories of private catalogs, such as the examination of the Classics, the Bibliography of Qianqingtang, the Bibliography answer, the even Records of the pedlar, and so on, According to the preface of each book, the origin and development of different categories are analyzed. At the same time, compared with the improvement of many large ancient bibliography after the founding of the people's Republic of China, the author evaluates the rationality of "Comprehensive record" to the category of "General catalogue" and saves the gain, and probes into the development and reform process of classical bibliography in the new period. Finally, the author summarizes the improvement of the catalogue of the two books, and expounds the bibliographic value and influence of the two books. In a word, this paper, by exploring the improvement of the general catalogue, shows the inheritance and innovation of the modern culture to the classical bibliography.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：G257

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 龐銘輝;;從《四庫(kù)全書總目》看紀(jì)昀的目錄學(xué)思想[J];傳承;2012年12期

2 朱新林;;《中國(guó)叢書綜錄》補(bǔ)正[J];圖書館雜志;2005年10期

，

本文編號(hào)：1791990