本文選題：文明城市 + 城市文明程度指數(shù)　； 參考：《東北大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：城市作為人民生產(chǎn)生活的空間場所,其文明特征隨著經(jīng)濟社會的不斷發(fā)展及人民素質(zhì)的不斷提高顯得愈發(fā)明顯。上世紀末期,我國總結近代以來城市文明的發(fā)展變遷范式,在全國掀起了文明城市的創(chuàng)建活動。當代中國的文明城市建設以“文明”為根本標志,堅持政治文明、物質(zhì)文明、精神文明、社會文明和生態(tài)文明協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展,以實現(xiàn)城市整體文明水平的有序提高。經(jīng)過20多年的發(fā)展,文明城市無論是在創(chuàng)建方面,還是在城市文明測評方面都取得了一定的成績,先后有南京、廈門、大連等多個城市被評選為中國文明城市。具體到文明城市測評實踐,從2004年《全國文明城市測評體系(試行)》的頒布到2005年出臺《全國文明城市測評體系操作手冊》,再到現(xiàn)在的2011年版《全國文明城市測評體系》,文明城市測評工作在科學的指導下開展的有聲有色。其中,《全國文明城市測評體系》通過綜合運用實地考察、材料審核、問卷調(diào)查、網(wǎng)絡媒體調(diào)查四種方法,把城市這一個大社會、大系統(tǒng)作為大型實驗的場所和考量對象,對城市進行文明程度指數(shù)的測評。此測評方法實現(xiàn)了對城市物質(zhì)文明、政治文明、精神文明創(chuàng)建的評估和考核,也打開了社會大型實驗之門。本文結合S市文明測評的實踐活動,運用公共產(chǎn)品理論、公共選擇理論、系統(tǒng)理論和國民素質(zhì)理論對S市的文明城市測評實踐活動進行了實證研究。全文共分為四個部分：第一部分從文明城市建設的核心概念和理論基礎出發(fā),強調(diào)在創(chuàng)建文明城市和開展測評實踐應注重系統(tǒng)規(guī)劃、市民參與,為創(chuàng)建文明城市以及開展文明城市測評實踐提供了理論支撐。第二部分對S市開展的文明城市測評實踐進行了簡要概述,并系統(tǒng)的通過數(shù)字化方式呈現(xiàn)了測評實踐所取得成果。第三部分針對S市文明城市測評實踐本身,通過筆者的親身參與,指出了S市在創(chuàng)建全國文明城市測評實踐中所存在的問題并分析產(chǎn)生問題的原因。第四部分是對S市在創(chuàng)建全國文明城市測評實踐所存在的問題提出對策和建議。
[Abstract]:As the space of people's production and life, the civilization characteristic of city becomes more and more obvious with the development of economy and society and the improvement of people's quality. At the end of last century, China summarized the paradigm of urban civilization development and vicissitude since modern times, and set off the establishment of civilized city in the whole country. The construction of civilized cities in contemporary China takes "civilization" as the basic symbol, and adheres to the coordinated development of political civilization, material civilization, spiritual civilization, social civilization and ecological civilization in order to realize the orderly improvement of the overall civilization level of the city. After more than 20 years of development, civilized cities have made some achievements in terms of establishment and evaluation of urban civilization, including Nanjing, Xiamen, Dalian and many other cities, which have been selected as Chinese civilization cities. To the practice of evaluating civilized cities, From the promulgation of the National civilized City Evaluation system (trial) in 2004 to the publication of the operational Manual of the National civilized City Evaluation system in 2005, to the present 2011 edition of the National civilized City Evaluation system, the evaluation of civilized cities has been carried out. Carried out under the guidance of science. Among them, the "National civilized City Evaluation system" takes the city as a large society and a large system as the place and object of large-scale experiments through the comprehensive use of four methods: field investigation, material review, questionnaire survey, and network media investigation. To carry on the city to carry on the civilized degree index appraisal. The evaluation method not only realizes the evaluation and assessment of urban material civilization, political civilization and spiritual civilization, but also opens the door of social large-scale experiment. Based on the practice of the evaluation of civilization in S City, this paper makes an empirical study on the practical activities of the Evaluation of civilized cities in S City by using the theory of public goods, the theory of public choice, the theory of system and the theory of national quality. The thesis is divided into four parts: the first part is based on the core concept and theoretical basis of the construction of civilized city, and emphasizes that the systematic planning and citizen participation should be paid attention to in the establishment of civilized city and the practice of evaluation and evaluation. It provides theoretical support for the establishment of civilized cities and the practice of evaluating civilized cities. The second part gives a brief overview of the practice of the evaluation of civilized cities in S city, and presents the achievements of the evaluation practice systematically through the digital method. In the third part, aiming at the practice of evaluating the civilized cities in S city, the author points out the problems existing in the practice of the evaluation and evaluation of the civilized cities of the whole country and analyzes the causes of the problems through the personal participation of the author. The fourth part is to put forward the countermeasures and suggestions on the problems existing in the practice of the evaluation and evaluation of S city in the establishment of the national civilized city.
【學位授予單位】：東北大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D64

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 朱清;;持續(xù)打造全國文明城市亮麗品牌——對廈門市創(chuàng)建文明城市工作的思考[J];福建行政學院學報;2008年05期

2 羅朝良;;創(chuàng)建文明城市與構建和諧社會[J];科學社會主義;2009年04期

3 徐德勝;楊利為;何傳春;;南京市創(chuàng)建文明城市的特點和啟示[J];探求;2010年01期

4 林菲;;對創(chuàng)建文明城市的幾點思考[J];法制與社會;2010年12期

5 董鴻揚;杜丹;;哈爾濱創(chuàng)建全國文明城市存在的問題及對策[J];哈爾濱市委黨校學報;2010年03期

6 張秀清;;關于烏海市創(chuàng)建全國文明城市的思考[J];中國城市經(jīng)濟;2010年10期

7 張苗;;如何完善創(chuàng)建文明城市的長效機制[J];才智;2011年16期

8 萬時樂;;城市文明與市民個體道德能力的提升[J];學術論壇;2011年11期

9 鐘詩蓉;;論創(chuàng)建全國文明城市工作中的材料收集與整理[J];城建檔案;2012年02期

10 李臘生;;試論文明城市創(chuàng)建長效機制——以武漢市為例[J];今日中國論壇;2012年12期

相關會議論文 前1條

1 陳東冬;;建設和諧文化,創(chuàng)建全國文明城市的對策研究[A];科學發(fā)展與社會責任（B卷）——第五屆沈陽科學學術年會文集[C];2008年

相關碩士學位論文 前10條

1 沈曉冬;我國文明城市創(chuàng)建政策工具研究[D];上海交通大學;2013年

2 周帆;創(chuàng)建文明城市中的政府職能優(yōu)化研究[D];重慶師范大學;2013年

3 尹頡;文明城市創(chuàng)建中市民自律意識培育研究[D];長江大學;2015年

4 張弘毅;區(qū)域協(xié)同治理視域中江蘇省沿江文明城市帶創(chuàng)建研究[D];蘇州大學;2015年

5 陳寧;S市創(chuàng)建全國文明城市測評實踐研究[D];東北大學;2014年

6 蔡育權;《文明城市測評體系》研究[D];廈門大學;2008年

7 王昕睿;文明城市創(chuàng)建中的政府行為研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學;2011年

8 劉澤鋒;文明城市創(chuàng)建中的政府職能優(yōu)化研究[D];湖南師范大學;2010年

9 高偉;臨沂市文明城市創(chuàng)建的長效機制探索[D];山東大學;2011年

10 崔浩;文明城市創(chuàng)建中的公眾參與問題研究[D];蘇州大學;2009年

，

本文編號：1953160