【摘要】：隨著社會的發(fā)展,隱私問題日益突出,特別是在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域。我們會認(rèn)為這是一個沒有隱私的時代,隱私的肆意"流動"我們或許已經(jīng)習(xí)以為常,加之技術(shù)的滲透帶來隱私販賣等諸多問題,使得我們在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)空間中的隱私權(quán)難以維護(hù)。一方面我們提倡并主張個人隱私權(quán)利,另一方面我們卻夸大了它的存在。有時,我們在經(jīng)濟(jì)利益的糖衣炮彈下背離了隱私保護(hù)的初衷�？僧�(dāng)我們遭受因隱私泄露而產(chǎn)生的后果時,我們才恍然大悟保護(hù)個人隱私的重要性。"數(shù)字遺忘"存在于互聯(lián)網(wǎng)當(dāng)中,并以數(shù)字技術(shù)為依托,針對個人隱私產(chǎn)生了一系列問題。本文從歐盟提出"被遺忘權(quán)"的概念入手,探討"被遺忘權(quán)"與受眾隱私之間的關(guān)系,梳理出互聯(lián)網(wǎng)時代受眾隱私侵害的種種表現(xiàn),通過研究發(fā)現(xiàn)其隱私問題的解決離不開互聯(lián)網(wǎng)傳播隱私的管理層面。受眾需要對隱私信息具有自律意識,從而在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)絡(luò)中建立起隱私的規(guī)制系統(tǒng)。個人自律、網(wǎng)絡(luò)隱私管理的制度構(gòu)建、行業(yè)監(jiān)督體制是保護(hù)受眾隱私不受侵害的重要措施。本文以文獻(xiàn)研究為主,對已有研究進(jìn)行進(jìn)一步得梳理與核實,從而得出,"被遺忘權(quán)"的真正目的在于被遺忘的價值,它與個人隱私之間的關(guān)系在于,它是隱私權(quán)在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)時代的延伸物,對于重塑人格形象、給予人格自由具有重要意義。但"被遺忘"卻并非完美地清除,我們需要探索隱私問題的本質(zhì)和可能解決的路徑。我國可以借鑒"被遺忘權(quán)"的理念,實行其本土化發(fā)展,但關(guān)鍵的因素在于公民隱私意識的構(gòu)建、媒介素養(yǎng)的提高、隱私文化的培育等,而運用傳播隱私管理理論正是解決之道。
[Abstract]:With the development of society, privacy issues become increasingly prominent, especially in the field of the Internet. We will think that this is an era of no privacy, the wanton "flow" of privacy we may have become accustomed to, and the infiltration of technology has brought about privacy trafficking and many other issues, making our privacy in the Internet space difficult to maintain. On the one hand, we advocate and advocate the right to privacy, on the other hand, we exaggerate its existence. Sometimes, under sugar-coated shells of economic interest, we deviate from the original intention of privacy protection. But when we suffer the consequences of privacy leaks, we suddenly realize the importance of protecting our privacy. " Digital oblivion "exists in the Internet, and based on digital technology, has created a series of problems for personal privacy." Starting with the concept of "right to be forgotten" put forward by the European Union, this paper discusses the relationship between the right to be forgotten and the privacy of the audience, and sorts out the various manifestations of the infringement of the privacy of the audience in the age of the Internet. Through the research, it is found that the privacy problem can not be solved without the management level of Internet communication privacy. The audience needs to have self-discipline to privacy information, so as to set up privacy regulation system in the Internet. Personal self-discipline, the construction of network privacy management system, industry supervision system is an important measure to protect audience privacy. Based on the literature research, this paper further combs and verifies the existing research and concludes that the real purpose of the "right to be forgotten" lies in the value of being forgotten, and the relationship between the right to be forgotten and the privacy of the individual lies in the relationship between the "right to be forgotten" and the individual privacy. It is the extension of the right to privacy in the Internet era, and it is of great significance to reshape the personality image and give the personality freedom. But being forgotten is not perfect. We need to explore the nature of privacy issues and possible ways to solve them. China can learn from the concept of "right to be forgotten" and carry out its localization development, but the key factors are the construction of citizens' privacy consciousness, the improvement of media literacy, the cultivation of privacy culture, and so on. And the use of communication privacy management theory is the solution.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 徐敬宏;張為杰;李玲;;西方新聞傳播學(xué)關(guān)于社交網(wǎng)絡(luò)中隱私侵權(quán)問題的研究現(xiàn)狀[J];國際新聞界;2014年10期

2 陳昶屹;;被遺忘權(quán)——歐美國家利益暗戰(zhàn)利器[J];法律與生活;2014年13期

3 周葆華;陸曄;;受眾的媒介信息處理能力——中國公眾媒介素養(yǎng)狀況調(diào)查報告之一[J];新聞記者;2008年04期

，

本文編號：2457595