【摘要】：財物是刑法中的基礎(chǔ)性概念,作為一類非常重要的犯罪對象,財物的界定關(guān)系到犯罪的認定和刑罰的適用。侵犯財產(chǎn)犯罪和賄賂犯罪都是古老的犯罪,我國刑法歷來規(guī)定侵犯財產(chǎn)的犯罪對象是財物,賄賂以財物為中介實現(xiàn)權(quán)力的交易。在刑法中界定財物可以幫助我們認識犯罪的本質(zhì),判斷刑法所保護的社會關(guān)系的性質(zhì)及其受損程度。該文共有以下幾個部分:第一個部分介紹了刑法中財物的概念和在刑法中界定財物的意義所在。第二個部分歸納了刑法中財物的特征和性質(zhì)。該部分通過梳理司法機關(guān)在具體司法實踐中對財物的不同認定方法,力求歸納出刑法中財物的三個基本特征:第一,財物應(yīng)具有價值,并且這種價值應(yīng)當同經(jīng)濟學中的價值概念相一致。其次,財物應(yīng)可為人力控制,人力不僅可以占有和支配該財物,而且可以通過人力實現(xiàn)財物的價值。第三,財物應(yīng)是客觀存在的,觀念的擬制物不是財物。第三部分詳細分析了刑法中的部分有體財物在不同案件中所體現(xiàn)出的不同司法觀點,如來源是否合法對認定財物的影響,違禁物是否納入刑法中財物的范疇,提貨憑證的不同界定主張等等問題。該文的第四部分分析了在何種情況下可以將財產(chǎn)性利益和虛擬財物納入刑法保護范疇。
[Abstract]:Property is a basic concept in criminal law. As a very important object of crime, the definition of property is related to the identification of crime and the application of penalty. Crime of infringing property and crime of bribery are ancient crimes. Our criminal law has always stipulated that the object of crime of infringing property is property, and bribery takes property as intermediary to realize the transaction of power. Defining property in criminal law can help us understand the nature of crime and judge the nature and damage of social relations protected by criminal law. This paper consists of the following parts: the first part introduces the concept of property in criminal law and the meaning of defining property in criminal law. The second part summarizes the characteristics and nature of property in criminal law. This part tries to sum up three basic characteristics of property in criminal law by combing the different methods of identifying property in specific judicial practice: first, property should have value. And this value should be consistent with the concept of value in economics. Secondly, property should be controlled by manpower, who can not only possess and dispose the property, but also realize the value of property by manpower. Third, the property should be objective existence, the idea fictitious thing is not the property. The third part of the detailed analysis of some of the criminal law embodied in different cases of physical property in different judicial views, such as whether the source of the legal impact on the identification of property, prohibited property into the scope of the criminal law. Claim of different definition of receipt of goods, and so on. The fourth part of this paper analyzes the circumstances under which property interests and virtual property can be brought into the scope of criminal law protection.
【學位授予單位】：鄭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 馬一德;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬財產(chǎn)繼承問題探析[J];法商研究;2013年05期

2 陳青青;;《1844年經(jīng)濟學哲學手稿》中私有財產(chǎn)概念簡析[J];西安文理學院學報(社會科學版);2013年04期

3 張建文;朱帥;;撿到已知密碼的信用卡在自動取款機上取款行為的定性[J];人民司法;2008年12期

，

本文編號：2146927