本文選題：3D打印 + 侵權(quán)判定�。� 參考：《蘭州大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著“一帶一路”的提出和積極構(gòu)建,我國社會主義市場經(jīng)濟不斷向縱深發(fā)展,科技創(chuàng)新越來越重要。十八大關(guān)于“創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略”的提出,使得各項新興技術(shù)更加多樣化。依托于“互聯(lián)網(wǎng)+”的日漸成熟,我國制造業(yè)得到了巨大的發(fā)展。而3D打印作為目前備受青睞的一項技術(shù),能夠使未來我國制造業(yè)產(chǎn)生無限可能。3D打印是一種通過材料逐層添加的制造三維物體的變革性、數(shù)字化增材制造技術(shù),具有制造時間短、復(fù)雜形狀制造簡單化以及滿足個性化需求的特點,最早起源于19世紀的美國。近些年來,隨著技術(shù)、功能的不斷完善,3D打印在我國市場上開始活躍起來,社會生產(chǎn)生活如醫(yī)療、食品加工、教育、制造業(yè)等諸多領(lǐng)域均受到了深刻的影響。3D打印給社會生產(chǎn)力帶來的積極影響不言而喻。但是,也將使得我國當前的社會秩序受到極大的挑戰(zhàn)。對此,本文從著作權(quán)法律制度的視角展開論證和分析。由于3D打印技術(shù)是由多個環(huán)節(jié)共同構(gòu)成的復(fù)雜程序,尤其是在依賴互聯(lián)網(wǎng)環(huán)境以及數(shù)字化技術(shù)的情況下,出現(xiàn)了大量對他人智力成果予以復(fù)制、傳播和使用的現(xiàn)象。對于這些新現(xiàn)象,我國立法并不能夠進行全面的規(guī)制即存在“空白地帶”。因此,文章通過對3D打印的深入剖析,總結(jié)運行原理中涉及到的著作權(quán)侵權(quán)現(xiàn)象,進行著作權(quán)理論的探討,為完善我國著作權(quán)相關(guān)法律制度提出合理的建議。旨在防止社會利益平衡機制失調(diào)、避免社會秩序陷入無序的狀態(tài)。文章共分為四個部分。首先,通過詳細介紹3D打印的相關(guān)知識,如運行原理、相關(guān)軟件、CAD文件、3D掃描技術(shù)和3D打印模型共享平臺。對3D打印進行了充分的掌握,并結(jié)合我國現(xiàn)行著作權(quán)制度進行了思考,從而總結(jié)出3D打印時代下可能產(chǎn)生的著作權(quán)風險;其次,以著作權(quán)的視角對3D打印的主要環(huán)節(jié)可能發(fā)生的侵權(quán)進行了分析,目的在于通過論證發(fā)現(xiàn)其與我國著作權(quán)法律制度的相悖之處,通過理論上的探討,結(jié)合司法實踐對其予以定性;同時,文章在第三部分結(jié)合3D打印的相關(guān)知識對著作權(quán)領(lǐng)域的一些立法情況進行了考察,如“異形復(fù)制”、“合理使用制度”、“實用藝術(shù)作品”。以期通過探討,從中得到應(yīng)對3D打印著作權(quán)侵權(quán)問題的啟示;最后,結(jié)合前文,以3D打印的著作權(quán)侵權(quán)考量為基礎(chǔ),提出了一些完善我國著作權(quán)制度的建議,希望能夠為3D打印時代下著作權(quán)法律保護機制的完善提供一定的參考。
[Abstract]:With the development and construction of "Belt and Road", the socialist market economy in China is developing in depth, and scientific and technological innovation is becoming more and more important. The proposal of "Innovation-driven Development Strategy" at the 18th CPC National Congress made the emerging technologies more diversified. Relying on the maturation of the Internet, the manufacturing industry of our country has been greatly developed. As a popular technology, 3D printing can make our manufacturing industry produce infinite possibility in the future. 3D printing is a transformative technology of manufacturing 3D objects added layer by material, and digital material increasing manufacturing technology. It has the characteristics of short manufacturing time, simple manufacturing of complex shapes and satisfying individual requirements. It originated in America in the 19 th century. In recent years, with the continuous improvement of technology and function, 3D printing has become active in the market of our country. Social production and life such as medical treatment, food processing, education, Manufacturing and other fields have been deeply affected. 3D printing has brought positive impact to social productivity. However, China's current social order will also be greatly challenged. In view of this, this paper demonstrates and analyzes from the perspective of copyright legal system. Because 3D printing technology is a complex program composed of many links, especially in the case of relying on Internet environment and digital technology, a large number of intellectual achievements of others have been copied, disseminated and used. To these new phenomena, our country legislation cannot carry on the comprehensive regulation namely existence "blank zone". Therefore, through the in-depth analysis of 3D printing, this paper summarizes the copyright infringement phenomenon involved in the operation principle, discusses the copyright theory, and puts forward some reasonable suggestions for perfecting the relevant legal system of copyright in our country. The aim is to prevent the imbalance of social interest balance mechanism and avoid the disorder of social order. The article is divided into four parts. Firstly, the related knowledge of 3D printing is introduced in detail, such as the principle of operation, the 3D scanning technology of CAD files and the sharing platform of 3D printing model. This paper makes a full grasp of 3D printing, and thinks about the current copyright system in China, so as to sum up the possible copyright risks in the era of 3D printing. Secondly, This paper analyzes the possible infringement of 3D printing from the perspective of copyright, in order to find out the contradiction between it and the copyright legal system of our country through demonstration, and to probe into it in theory. At the same time, in the third part, combining with the knowledge of 3D printing, the author investigates some legislative situation in the field of copyright, such as "heteromorphic copy", "reasonable use system", A work of practical art. Finally, combined with the above, based on the consideration of copyright infringement of 3D printing, some suggestions to improve the copyright system of our country are put forward. The author hopes to provide some reference for the perfection of copyright legal protection mechanism in the age of 3D printing.
【學位授予單位】：蘭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李永明;鄭金晶;;3D打印中CAD文件的定性與復(fù)制問題研究[J];浙江大學學報(人文社會科學版);2016年02期

2 劉強;陳舜翊;;開放源代碼硬件許可協(xié)議知識產(chǎn)權(quán)問題研究——以3D打印為視角[J];北京理工大學學報(社會科學版);2016年01期

3 寧立志;王德夫;;論3D打印數(shù)字模型的著作權(quán)[J];武漢大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2016年01期

4 黃玉燁;張惠瑤;;3D數(shù)字模型的復(fù)制權(quán)保護探析[J];中南大學學報(社會科學版);2015年05期

5 李杜;;外層空間3D打印對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)制度的挑戰(zhàn)[J];北京理工大學學報(社會科學版);2015年03期

6 黃亮;;3D打印著作權(quán)問題探討[J];現(xiàn)代出版;2015年02期

7 羅嬌;;“3D打印”的著作權(quán)法律問題研究[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2014年08期

8 劉強;歐陽e，

本文編號：2064367