本文選題：安全生產(chǎn) + 法律關(guān)系主體�。� 參考：《天津工業(yè)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：以法理學(xué)與經(jīng)濟(jì)法學(xué)的法律關(guān)系主體理論為基礎(chǔ),結(jié)合現(xiàn)行安全生產(chǎn)法的具體規(guī)定,我國的安全生產(chǎn)法律關(guān)系主體主要包括生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營行為主體、安全監(jiān)管主體、社會主體和勞動主體四類。生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營行為主體即實施生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營行為,包括各類生產(chǎn)、使用、經(jīng)營、運輸和存儲行為的行為主體。安全監(jiān)管主體,即安全生產(chǎn)監(jiān)督管理主體,是安全生產(chǎn)法上依法履行對保證生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營行為安全實施的外部監(jiān)督管理職責(zé)的公權(quán)力主體。社會主體是安全生產(chǎn)法體現(xiàn)新時期安全生產(chǎn)社會共治理論以及經(jīng)濟(jì)法中"政府—社會—市場"三維層次理論的重要法律關(guān)系主體。勞動主體是依法與生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營單位建立勞動法律關(guān)系從事生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營勞動,并依據(jù)安全生產(chǎn)法具有安全生產(chǎn)權(quán)利和義務(wù)的主體。以上四類主體之間基于一定的法學(xué)原理發(fā)生的具有安全管理法律意義的結(jié)構(gòu)性關(guān)系的整體,可以認(rèn)為是安全生產(chǎn)法上構(gòu)建的具體的多維主體框架結(jié)構(gòu)。生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營行為對安全要素的有效配置是這一多維主體框架結(jié)構(gòu)的價值核心,安全管理職能的協(xié)調(diào)分配是這一多維主體框架結(jié)構(gòu)的中心線索。生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營單位應(yīng)當(dāng)承擔(dān)本體性的安全管理職能對單位的生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營行為采取自我保障安全的管理措施;安全監(jiān)管主體應(yīng)當(dāng)憑借一定的主體結(jié)構(gòu)構(gòu)建和權(quán)力形式配置,實現(xiàn)一種行為主體外部的強制性公權(quán)力安全監(jiān)管;社會主體作為脫胎于市民社會處于市民社會與政治國家中間層的相對獨立的主體則應(yīng)當(dāng)承擔(dān)一定的參與安全監(jiān)督和管理的職能;勞動主體基于勞動安全本身的價值重要性和相對獨立性,應(yīng)當(dāng)通過一定的勞動安全權(quán)利義務(wù)配置,對生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營單位的勞動安全乃至整個生產(chǎn)安全保障發(fā)揮能動的主體功能。在各自明確承擔(dān)一定的安全管理職能的基礎(chǔ)上,協(xié)調(diào)各自的安全管理職能的發(fā)揮是這一多維主體框架結(jié)構(gòu)的重點。本體性的安全管理是一種相對的生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營行為安全保障閉環(huán)機制,但同時應(yīng)當(dāng)接受來自外部的公權(quán)力安全監(jiān)管、社會主體參與安全監(jiān)督和管理以及來自內(nèi)部的勞動安全監(jiān)督管理的不同程度的約束;公權(quán)力安全監(jiān)管是公權(quán)力因素作用于安全生產(chǎn)法的體現(xiàn),也是彰顯經(jīng)濟(jì)法價值精神的標(biāo)志之一。這一安全監(jiān)管既應(yīng)當(dāng)輔助協(xié)調(diào)本體性安全管理,又應(yīng)當(dāng)組織協(xié)調(diào)社會主體的參與安全監(jiān)督和管理,同時也應(yīng)當(dāng)積極依法接受源自社會的參與安全監(jiān)督管理的各種參與意見和參與決策;社會主體的參與安全監(jiān)督和管理作為一種社會性、參與性的安全監(jiān)督和管理,需要在與本體性安全管理和公權(quán)力安全監(jiān)管的相互聯(lián)系、相互作用下發(fā)揮其功能,作用到對生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營行為配置安全要素的干預(yù)之上;勞動主體的勞動安全權(quán)利義務(wù)下的在單位內(nèi)部的安全管理和監(jiān)督憑借與本體性安全管理的相互聯(lián)系和相互作用,發(fā)揮相應(yīng)的安全管理功能和意義。誠然,在一定意義上講安全生產(chǎn)法的多維主體框架結(jié)構(gòu)本身也是一種圍繞生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營行為配置安全要素這一價值核心的多元安全管理職能分配架構(gòu)。很大程度上而言,未來的安全生產(chǎn)法主體機制的改革與發(fā)展,也是圍繞著如何更加優(yōu)化的分配各自的安全管理職能而展開的。
[Abstract]:On the basis of the subject theory of legal relations between jurisprudence and economic law, combining with the specific provisions of current safety production law, the main body of the legal relationship of safety production in our country mainly includes the main body of production and operation, the main body of safety supervision, the social subject and the four types of labor subject. The main body of the behavior of production, use, operation, transportation and storage. The subject of safety supervision, that is, the subject of safety production supervision and management, is the main body of public power in the safety production law to perform the external supervision and management of the safety of production and operation in accordance with the law. The social subject is the safety production law embodying the social security of the new period of production. The main body of legal relations in the theory of governance and the three-dimensional theory of "government - Society - market" in economic law. The main body of labor is the subject of establishing labor legal relations with the production and operating units according to law, and the subject of safe production rights and obligations according to the safety production law. The four types of subjects are based on a certain law. The whole of the structural relationship with the legal meaning of security management can be considered as the concrete multi-dimensional body frame structure built on the safety production law. The effective allocation of the production and operation behavior to the security elements is the core of the multidimensional main frame structure, and the coordination allocation of the security management function is the multidimensional The central clue of the main frame structure. The production and operation unit should undertake the self security management measures for the production and operation behavior of the unit, and the main body of the security supervision should rely on the construction of a certain main body structure and the configuration of the power form, so as to realize a compulsory public power security outside the subject of the behavior. The social subject, as a relatively independent subject, which is born out of the civil society and the middle level of the political state, should undertake certain functions to participate in the safety supervision and management, and the labor subject, based on the value importance and relative independence of labor safety itself, should be matched by certain labor safety rights and obligations. On the basis of specific security management functions, coordination of their respective security management functions is the key point of this multi-dimensional main frame structure. The ontological security management is a relative production and management. The closed loop mechanism of behavior safety guarantees, but at the same time, the public power and security supervision from the outside should be accepted, the social subject participates in the safety supervision and management as well as the internal labor safety supervision and management of different degrees. The public power and safety supervision is the embodiment of the public power factor acting on Yu An's whole production law and the value of the economic law. One of the symbols of the spirit. This security supervision should assist in coordinating the management of the security of the body, and organizing and coordinating the participation of the social subjects in the safety supervision and management, and should also actively accept all kinds of participation opinions and participation decisions from the social participation in safety supervision and management according to law, and the participation of social subjects in safety supervision and management. As a social, participatory security supervision and management needs to be interconnected with the security management of ontological security and public power and security, to play its function under the interaction and to interfere with the security factors of the disposition of the production and operation behavior; and the safety management within the unit under the labor safety rights and obligations of the labor subject. And supervision relies on the mutual connection and interaction with the ontology security management to play the corresponding security management function and significance. Indeed, in a sense, the multidimensional body framework of safety production law is also a multi security management function distribution framework which is the core of the value core of the production and operation behavior. To a large extent, the reform and development of the main mechanism of the future safety production law also revolves around how to optimize the distribution of their respective security management functions.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.54

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 莫紀(jì)宏;;國外安全生產(chǎn)法律制度簡介[J];中國審判;2013年07期

2 慕慶國;;安全管理的國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀分析[J];山東工商學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年02期

3 胡建淼;;“行政強制措施”與“行政強制執(zhí)行”的分界[J];中國法學(xué);2012年02期

4 向春玲;;論多種社會主體在社會管理創(chuàng)新中的作用[J];中共中央黨校學(xué)報;2011年05期

5 葛道順;;中國社會組織發(fā)展:從社會主體到國家意識——公民社會組織發(fā)展及其對意識形態(tài)構(gòu)建的影響[J];江蘇社會科學(xué);2011年03期

6 龐正;;法律關(guān)系基礎(chǔ)理論問題論辯[J];法治研究;2010年06期

7 曲新久;;論刑法中的“公共安全”[J];人民檢察;2010年09期

8 俞可平;;中國公民社會研究的若干問題[J];中共中央黨校學(xué)報;2007年06期

9 陶愛萍;;論安全生產(chǎn)法的價值取向[J];生產(chǎn)力研究;2007年21期

10 何侍昌;;對我國安全生產(chǎn)責(zé)任制建設(shè)的思考[J];安全生產(chǎn)與監(jiān)督;2006年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王婷;我國煤礦安全生產(chǎn)法律問題研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：1832516