本文選題：毒駕行為 + 社會(huì)危害性��； 參考：《湘潭大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著機(jī)動(dòng)車的不斷普及,毒駕也已成為一種比較普遍的行為,這類行為極大地危害著公共安全,極易釀成特大的道路交通事故,然而按照現(xiàn)行的法律法規(guī),行為人毒駕,僅僅在導(dǎo)致人員傷亡、財(cái)產(chǎn)損失以后,才會(huì)受到刑事處罰,否則只會(huì)按交通違法行為來處理,而不被視為犯罪。這樣的制度安排有著極大的法律漏洞,即其無法對(duì)行為人毒駕但沒有造成損害后果的抽象危險(xiǎn)行為合理地進(jìn)行處罰。為此,有必要考慮將毒駕行為明確地納入到刑法的規(guī)制范圍之中。主張毒駕行為入刑的必要性在于:毒駕行為具有嚴(yán)重的社會(huì)危害性、是司法實(shí)踐的迫切需要,是社會(huì)公眾的訴求,切合我國的刑事政策,且規(guī)制毒駕行為的現(xiàn)行相關(guān)法律存在著不足;毒駕行為入刑的可行性在于:毒駕行為入刑符合刑法的謙抑性、毒駕行為入刑有境外的相關(guān)立法例可供參考,毒駕行為入刑的國內(nèi)外相關(guān)技術(shù)條件日臻完善。故而,將毒駕行為納入到刑法的規(guī)制范圍之中是有一定基礎(chǔ)的。當(dāng)然,對(duì)毒駕行為入刑問題的探討不能僅僅停留在理論上,而應(yīng)有具體的制度設(shè)計(jì)與其相呼應(yīng)。建議在立法上將毒駕行為放置于醉駕行為之后作為危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪中的一種情形。在法定刑的配置上應(yīng)注意對(duì)人道性原則、罪刑均衡原則、明確性原則等的貫徹。對(duì)只有拘役一種主刑的危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪應(yīng)加入有期徒刑這又一主刑種,使對(duì)該罪形成一個(gè)更加嚴(yán)密的刑罰網(wǎng)。以便于更好地對(duì)毒駕犯罪人員罰當(dāng)其罪,做到罪責(zé)刑相適應(yīng)。在對(duì)毒駕行為入刑后具體條文的設(shè)計(jì)上不用增加“情節(jié)嚴(yán)重”這一限制性條件,但在處理該類案件時(shí)還應(yīng)受到我國《刑法》第13條“但書”的限制。明確對(duì)毒駕行為應(yīng)該采取“零容忍”的態(tài)度。分析毒駕行為入刑的構(gòu)成要件,即犯罪客體為對(duì)公共交通安全的侵害;犯罪的客觀方面表現(xiàn)為駕駛?cè)嗽谖扯酒泛笤谧陨硖幱跓o責(zé)任能力或者限制責(zé)任能力的狀態(tài)下仍然駕駛機(jī)動(dòng)車的行為,且構(gòu)成本罪不要求行為人造成實(shí)際的損害后果;年滿16周歲精神正常的自然人即可成為本罪的主體;犯罪主觀方面為故意。有該危險(xiǎn)駕駛行為,同時(shí)符合交通肇事罪或者以危險(xiǎn)方法危害公共安全罪的,應(yīng)根據(jù)具體情況來決定對(duì)行為人判處交通肇事罪或者以危險(xiǎn)方法危害公共安全罪。此外還要注意到操作中罪重與罪輕的考量以及與行政處罰的銜接等問題。
[Abstract]:With the increasing popularity of motor vehicles, drug driving has become a relatively common behavior, which greatly endangers public safety and can easily lead to serious road traffic accidents. However, according to the current laws and regulations, the perpetrators of drug driving, Only after causing casualties and property losses will they be criminally punished, otherwise they will only be dealt with as traffic violations and not as crimes. This kind of system arrangement has great legal loophole, that is, it can not punish the abstract dangerous behavior of the perpetrator but does not cause the harm consequence reasonably. Therefore, it is necessary to consider the explicit inclusion of drug driving behavior in the scope of criminal law. The necessity of advocating the crime of drug driving behavior lies in: drug driving behavior has serious social harmfulness, it is the urgent need of judicial practice, it is the appeal of the public, and it is in line with the criminal policy of our country. And there are some deficiencies in the current law of drug driving behavior; the feasibility of drug driving behavior into the criminal law is that: drug driving behavior in accordance with the modesty of the criminal law, drug driving behavior into the criminal law, there are overseas relevant legislation for reference, The domestic and foreign technical conditions of drug-driving crime are becoming more and more perfect. Therefore, there is a certain foundation to bring drug driving behavior into the scope of criminal law. Of course, the discussion of the crime of drug driving behavior can not only stay in theory, but should be accompanied by specific system design. It is suggested that drug driving should be placed after drunken driving as a case of dangerous driving. The principle of humanity, the principle of balance between crime and punishment, the principle of clarity should be paid attention to in the allocation of statutory punishment. To the crime of dangerous driving with only one kind of criminal detention, we should add the term of imprisonment, and form a more strict penalty net for this crime. In order to better punish the drug driving criminals as its crime, to adapt to the crime. There is no need to add the restrictive condition of "serious circumstances" in the design of the specific provisions after the crime of drug driving, but it should also be restricted by the proviso of Article 13 of the Criminal Law of our country when dealing with this kind of cases. We should adopt a zero tolerance attitude towards drug driving behavior. This paper analyzes the constitutive elements of the crime of drug driving, that is, the object of the crime is the violation of the public transportation safety; The objective aspect of the crime is that the driver still drives the motor vehicle after taking drugs in the condition that he has no ability of responsibility or limit the ability of liability, and the crime does not require the perpetrator to cause actual damage consequences; The natural person who has reached the age of 16 years can become the subject of the crime; the subjective aspect of the crime is intentional. If there is such dangerous driving behavior which is in line with the crime of causing traffic accident or endangering public safety by dangerous method, the crime of causing traffic accident or endangering public safety by dangerous method shall be decided according to the specific circumstances. In addition, attention should be paid to the consideration of the seriousness of crime and misdemeanor in operation and the connection with administrative punishment and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馬圣;;“毒駕”行為刑法規(guī)制探析——以《刑法修正案(九)》第七條為中心[J];華中師范大學(xué)研究生學(xué)報(bào);2016年04期

2 付曉雅;;《中華人民共和國刑法修正案(九)》專題研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2015年11期

3 熊永明;;我國罪名建言熱潮之隱憂及其批判[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2015年06期

4 趙秉志;袁彬;;中國刑法立法改革的新思維——以《刑法修正案(九)》為中心[J];法學(xué);2015年10期

5 楊柳;;釋法抑或造法:由刑法歷次修正引發(fā)的思考[J];中國法學(xué);2015年05期

6 彭文華;;危險(xiǎn)駕駛行為入罪的必要性與可行性——以《刑法修正案(九)》的相關(guān)規(guī)定為視角[J];法學(xué)論壇;2015年05期

7 馬巖;李靜然;;毒品犯罪審判中的幾個(gè)法律適用問題[J];法律適用;2015年09期

8 柳硯濤;;論舉輕以明重在行政處罰中的應(yīng)用[J];政治與法律;2015年08期

9 吳林生;;刑法修正案(九)草案的得失及修改建議[J];中國刑事法雜志;2015年01期

10 劉杰;;危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪構(gòu)成要件修正論——“毒駕”入刑之再提倡[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年01期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 史丹如;;危險(xiǎn)駕駛行為：入罪未當(dāng)時(shí)[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條

1 吳承鑫;毒駕的法律規(guī)制研究[D];河南大學(xué);2016年

2 郭秋蘭;吸毒駕駛行為入罪研究[D];貴州民族大學(xué);2015年

3 張瀟;毒駕之刑事立法探討[D];海南大學(xué);2015年

4 許晨;吸毒駕駛行為入罪研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2015年

5 唐利波;毒駕入刑問題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2014年

6 鄭艷;毒駕行為入罪的刑法思考[D];華東政法大學(xué);2014年

7 秦川;“毒駕”刑事責(zé)任研究[D];中國海洋大學(xué);2014年

8 史婧;醉酒駕駛?cè)胱锾轿鯷D];中國政法大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1823198