本文選題：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán) + 網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)��； 參考：《蘭州大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)行業(yè)高速發(fā)展的今天,信息傳播的速度早已超過(guò)人們的想象,大數(shù)據(jù)、云計(jì)算等新鮮詞匯充斥耳邊,在推動(dòng)和促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)和文化發(fā)展的同時(shí),也為著作權(quán)侵權(quán)提供了滋生的土壤和法律規(guī)制的滯后,在網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下著作權(quán)侵權(quán)糾紛頻發(fā),其中以百度案、雅虎案等為代表的典型案件為我國(guó)淡薄的版權(quán)意識(shí)敲響警鐘。在這些頻繁發(fā)生的糾紛尋求解決的過(guò)程中,最為核心的就是著作權(quán)侵權(quán)的判定。在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)平臺(tái)發(fā)生的著作權(quán)侵權(quán)問(wèn)題總是面臨著責(zé)任主體及歸責(zé)原則難以確定的問(wèn)題,即侵權(quán)判定上具有復(fù)雜性和多樣性,這也是解決著作權(quán)侵權(quán)糾紛的難點(diǎn)所在。在此背景下,“通知-刪除”規(guī)則應(yīng)運(yùn)而生。作為網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商用于免責(zé)的“通知-刪除”規(guī)則,平衡了網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商和網(wǎng)絡(luò)用戶、著作權(quán)人三方的利益。但是在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)不斷深入和拓寬我們生活的今天,知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域以“通知-刪除”規(guī)則為代表的著作權(quán)侵權(quán)保護(hù)制度仍有侵權(quán)判定、責(zé)任原則、通知標(biāo)準(zhǔn)等問(wèn)題亟待解決。本文通過(guò)考察“通知-刪除”規(guī)則的產(chǎn)生,在分析該規(guī)則的法理原理和技術(shù)手段在著作權(quán)侵權(quán)案件判定中的運(yùn)用,并同時(shí)橫向比較各國(guó)關(guān)于“通知-刪除”規(guī)則的規(guī)定與司法實(shí)踐的基礎(chǔ)上,闡述我國(guó)“通知-刪除”的立法及司法實(shí)踐。從“通知-刪除”規(guī)則在著作權(quán)侵權(quán)糾紛中的核心要素責(zé)任主體、責(zé)任認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、版權(quán)領(lǐng)域以及當(dāng)前日趨成熟的網(wǎng)絡(luò)商務(wù)平臺(tái)出發(fā),在前文分析的基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)我國(guó)“通知-刪除”規(guī)則在著作權(quán)侵權(quán)判定的適用提出一些粗淺的看法和建議,以期對(duì)構(gòu)建一個(gè)完善的“通知-刪除”規(guī)則體系有所啟發(fā)。
[Abstract]:Today, with the rapid development of the Internet industry, the speed of information dissemination has already exceeded people's imagination. Big data, cloud computing and other fresh words are full of ears, while promoting and promoting economic and cultural development,It also provides breeding soil for copyright infringement and lag of legal regulation. In the network environment, copyright infringement disputes occur frequently. Typical cases, such as Baidu case, Yahoo case and so on, serve as a wake-up call for weak copyright awareness in our country.In the process of finding a solution to these frequent disputes, the most important thing is the judgment of copyright infringement.The problem of copyright infringement on Internet platform is always faced with the problem that the subject of responsibility and the principle of imputation are difficult to determine, that is, the judgment of infringement is complicated and diverse, which is also the difficulty to solve the dispute of copyright infringement.In this context, the "Notification-Delete" rule came into being.The "Notification-Delete" rule, which is used as a network service provider, balances the interests of the network service provider, the network user and the copyright owner.However, as the Internet continues to deepen and broaden our life today, the copyright infringement protection system represented by "Notification-Delete" rules in the field of intellectual property rights still has some problems to be solved urgently, such as infringement judgment, liability principle, notification standard and so on.By investigating the emergence of "Notification-Delete" rule, this paper analyzes the legal principle and technical means of the rule and its application in the judgment of copyright infringement cases.At the same time, the legislation and judicial practice of "Notification-Delete" in China are expounded on the basis of the horizontal comparison of the rules of "Notification-Delete" and judicial practice.Starting from the "Notification-Delete" rule in copyright infringement disputes, the main elements of the responsibility of the core elements, liability standards, copyright field and the current maturing network business platform,On the basis of the above analysis, this paper puts forward some general views and suggestions on the application of "Notification-Delete" rules in the judgment of copyright infringement, in order to enlighten the construction of a perfect "Notification-Delete" rule system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊桂琴;楊金;康彥叢;;郵政跨境電子商務(wù)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)防范研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)論壇;2016年12期

2 徐明;;避風(fēng)港原則前沿問(wèn)題研究——以“通知-刪除”作為訴訟前置程序?yàn)檎归_[J];東方法學(xué);2016年05期

3 張賽婭;;淺析競(jìng)價(jià)排名中搜索引擎的審查義務(wù)——以“魏則西事件”為引[J];經(jīng)營(yíng)管理者;2016年24期

4 王遷;;王遷:電商知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)頻遭惡意維權(quán)需完善法規(guī)[J];河南科技;2016年12期

5 徐敏;劉友華;;電商平臺(tái)專利間接侵權(quán)的注意義務(wù)研究[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2016年05期

6 何瓊;呂璐;;“通知—?jiǎng)h除”規(guī)則在專利領(lǐng)域的適用困境——兼論《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》第36條的彌補(bǔ)與完善[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2016年05期

7 鄧蔚霞;;立法打磨專利“盔甲”[J];浙江人大;2016年01期

8 陳紹玲;王文敏;;俄羅斯《反盜版法》評(píng)析及其對(duì)我國(guó)網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)保護(hù)的啟示[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2015年10期

9 許諒亮;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺(tái)提供商專利侵權(quán)法律責(zé)任[J];科技與法律;2015年03期

10 司曉;范露瓊;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域“通知—?jiǎng)h除”規(guī)則濫用的法律規(guī)制[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2015年Z1期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 董毅智;;惡意維權(quán)暴露電商平臺(tái)“通知—?jiǎng)h除”規(guī)則漏洞[N];中國(guó)工商報(bào);2017年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 郭元君;中美避風(fēng)港規(guī)則研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年

2 于麗娜;中美網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商避風(fēng)港制度中“通知與刪除”規(guī)則的比較研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1773892