本文關(guān)鍵詞：金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)下防火墻法律制度研究　出處：《河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng) 風(fēng)險(xiǎn)防范 金融防火墻

【摘要】：金融在全球經(jīng)濟(jì)中具有舉足輕重的地位,為實(shí)體經(jīng)濟(jì)提供資本支持,同時(shí)更是一國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)穩(wěn)定的平衡器,在經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的大環(huán)境下,金融業(yè)愈發(fā)的趨向于具有協(xié)同效益的混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)模式;我國(guó)金融業(yè)發(fā)展歷程較短,但卻有著一個(gè)較為全面的發(fā)展過程,建國(guó)初期的原始混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)模式隨著計(jì)劃經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展,促使風(fēng)險(xiǎn)頻發(fā),國(guó)務(wù)院和銀行業(yè)監(jiān)管部門吸取國(guó)內(nèi)外金融業(yè)發(fā)展經(jīng)驗(yàn)適時(shí)抉擇,選取分業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)、分業(yè)監(jiān)管模式對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)金融業(yè)加以嚴(yán)格管控,然而進(jìn)入新時(shí)期,在金融全球化和外來金融資本如潮水般涌入的情勢(shì)下,面對(duì)國(guó)際資本競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的加劇,我國(guó)不得不選擇逐步拋棄保守的分業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)模式而建立現(xiàn)代金融業(yè)混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)模式;分業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)、分業(yè)監(jiān)管被拋棄的同時(shí),金融風(fēng)險(xiǎn)勢(shì)必在金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)中悄然而生,由風(fēng)險(xiǎn)所致的危機(jī)也必然影響我國(guó)金融市場(chǎng)的穩(wěn)定;在金融立法缺失和監(jiān)管制度落后的環(huán)境下,貿(mào)然進(jìn)行經(jīng)營(yíng)模式轉(zhuǎn)變勢(shì)必造成風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的串聯(lián)進(jìn)而引發(fā)金融危機(jī),這也是國(guó)務(wù)院和國(guó)家銀行業(yè)監(jiān)管機(jī)構(gòu)所預(yù)見到的問題,在加強(qiáng)整合競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力以及發(fā)揮規(guī)模效益的同時(shí)對(duì)于金融風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的防范不可小覷,因?yàn)榻鹑跇I(yè)雖然是高風(fēng)險(xiǎn)、高收益行業(yè),但同時(shí)又是一國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的命脈行業(yè),故金融業(yè)穩(wěn)定、健康、有序發(fā)展應(yīng)當(dāng)擺在與效益同等重要的地位,甚至要稍微高于對(duì)效益的追求的層面;同西方發(fā)達(dá)資本主義國(guó)家相比,我國(guó)金融防火墻制度的產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展都較為薄弱,我國(guó)金融業(yè)發(fā)展期間較短,雖是基本上經(jīng)歷了金融業(yè)發(fā)展的全部階段,但大都是向世界各先進(jìn)國(guó)家習(xí)得并施以法律加以推廣的舶來品,面對(duì)自身金融業(yè)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的評(píng)估缺乏經(jīng)驗(yàn)。拿金融防護(hù)墻制度來說,我國(guó)金融防火墻制度的發(fā)展是一個(gè)政府指引的漸進(jìn)發(fā)展過程,雖然現(xiàn)階段混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)模式已經(jīng)實(shí)際的在金融市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)中發(fā)揮作用,但是金融各業(yè)之間的監(jiān)管還是各自為政,缺乏一個(gè)全面的均衡的適用于金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)的“防火墻”制度。本文以五部分組成,通過對(duì)我國(guó)金融業(yè)發(fā)展和防火墻構(gòu)建的現(xiàn)狀加以分析,并借鑒國(guó)外經(jīng)驗(yàn)找出完善我國(guó)金融防火墻制度具體策略和立法原則。第一部分,主要通過引言加以介紹金融業(yè)混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)模式以及防火墻制度完善等問題的研究目的和意義以及國(guó)內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀,以及對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者的相關(guān)論述進(jìn)行整理分析,借以完善我國(guó)現(xiàn)有金融防火墻相關(guān)制度進(jìn)而構(gòu)建一部完備的金融防火墻法律制度。第二部分,主要介紹金融防火墻理論基礎(chǔ)。通過對(duì)金融防火墻制度產(chǎn)生的市場(chǎng)背景以及金融防火墻制度的分類和作用來闡明金融防火墻在我國(guó)金融業(yè)混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)模式下,金融監(jiān)管的發(fā)展方向。第三部分,以美國(guó)、日本為兩大對(duì)比對(duì)象,將域外相關(guān)金融防火墻制度經(jīng)驗(yàn),取長(zhǎng)補(bǔ)短,認(rèn)真汲取值得借鑒的有益制度。在明確我國(guó)現(xiàn)有混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)金融監(jiān)管制度存在不足的情勢(shì)下,通過選擇、對(duì)比,尋求適用于我國(guó)的金融防火墻制度的發(fā)展范式。第四部分,主要介紹我國(guó)金融業(yè)混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)當(dāng)前發(fā)展態(tài)勢(shì),以及我國(guó)相關(guān)金融防火墻制度在立法、司法、執(zhí)法三個(gè)層面的現(xiàn)狀與不足。通過立法、執(zhí)法監(jiān)管、金融消費(fèi)者和中小股東保護(hù)以及防火墻制度和協(xié)同效益協(xié)調(diào)困難等四個(gè)具體問題,來發(fā)現(xiàn)我國(guó)金融業(yè)發(fā)展及金融防火墻制度還有哪些不足。第五部分,結(jié)合我國(guó)現(xiàn)有法律規(guī)定以及域外的相關(guān)制度,提出針對(duì)兩大方面完善我國(guó)金融防火墻制度的建議,包括金融防火墻的立法原則及其在實(shí)踐層面中的具體操作方法,進(jìn)而使得法律和自律防火墻在我國(guó)金融法律制度中趨于完備,在金融司法實(shí)踐中能夠更為便利有效的應(yīng)用。使我國(guó)金融業(yè)在國(guó)際金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)大趨勢(shì)下,發(fā)揮規(guī)模效益的同時(shí)防范金融風(fēng)險(xiǎn),為金融業(yè)健康有序發(fā)展保駕護(hù)航�？傊S著我國(guó)金融業(yè)的不斷發(fā)展和演變,針對(duì)本國(guó)金融特性的監(jiān)管方案也逐漸產(chǎn)生和完善;目前我國(guó)金融防火墻制度已有一定發(fā)展,但呈現(xiàn)一種破碎化的狀態(tài),監(jiān)管機(jī)構(gòu)的各自為政,也導(dǎo)致我國(guó)至今還未形成一部完整的針對(duì)現(xiàn)代混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)模式的金融防火墻法律制度。這是目前我國(guó)金融防火墻制度發(fā)展完善的缺失點(diǎn),更是需要著重彌補(bǔ)的短板,建立健全金融法律能夠?yàn)榻鹑跇I(yè)的健康發(fā)展提供有力保證,因此金融防火墻制度的發(fā)展完善需要相關(guān)法律來予以支持和引導(dǎo),而金融監(jiān)管法律的構(gòu)建要有一個(gè)中心思想,這就是隨著金融全球化浪潮的推進(jìn),我國(guó)金融業(yè)發(fā)展規(guī)模逐漸擴(kuò)大,國(guó)內(nèi)外金融資本競(jìng)爭(zhēng)不斷加劇的情勢(shì)下,在安全穩(wěn)定和效益利潤(rùn)中尋求平衡點(diǎn)是構(gòu)建和完善具有中國(guó)特色的金融防火墻法律制度的重中之重。
[Abstract]:Finance plays a decisive role in the global economy, to provide capital support for the real economy, but also a country's economic stability balancer, in the context of economic globalization, the financial industry increasingly tend to have synergistic benefits of mixed operation; the development process of China's financial industry is relatively short, but with a the comprehensive development process, the early days of the original operation mode with the development of the planned economy, prompting frequent risks, the State Council and the banking regulatory departments from domestic and foreign financial industry development experience timely choice, select separate operation, separate supervision mode to the strict control of the domestic financial sector, but in the new period, in the financial globalization and foreign financial capital flooded into the situation, in the face of international capital competition, China had to choose to gradually abandon the separate operation mode and the establishment of a conservative Mixed operation mode of the modern financial industry; separate operation, separate supervision abandoned at the same time, financial risks in the financial mixed operation born quietly, from the risk caused by crisis will influence the stability of China's financial market; financial environment in the absence of legislation and supervision system behind the series, rashly business model change will inevitably cause the risk of triggering a financial crisis, this is also the State Council and the state banking regulators foresaw problems in strengthening the integration and competitiveness play a scale and prevent the financial risk can not be underestimated, because the financial industry is high risk, high profit industry, but it is the lifeblood of a country's economic development industry therefore, the financial industry stable, healthy, orderly development should be placed in the equally important position with benefits, even slightly higher than that of the pursuit of the benefit with the western developed level; The capitalist countries, the emergence and development of China's financial firewall system are relatively weak. During the development of the financial industry in China is relatively short, although it is basically through all stages of the development of the financial industry, but mostly to the advanced countries in the world and to promote the acquisition of legal evaluation abroad, face their own risk to the financial sector lack experience with financial system. The protective wall, the development of China's financial firewall system is the progressive development of a government guidance, although the mixed operation mode at this stage has actually play a role in the financial market competition, but the financial industry regulation or lack of coordination between, for the lack of a comprehensive and balanced financial mixed operation the "firewall" system. This paper is composed of five parts, construction status through the development of China's financial industry and the firewall are analyzed, and the reference of foreign Check out the improvement of China's financial firewall system specific strategies and principles of legislation. The first part mainly introduces the problem of financial mixed operation mode and firewall system improving the research purpose and significance and research status at home and abroad through the introduction and discussion of domestic and foreign research were analyzed, in order to improve the existing financial firewall in China the related system and construct a complete financial firewall legal system. The second part mainly introduces the theoretical basis of financial firewall. Through the classification and role of the market in the background of the financial firewall system and financial firewall system to clarify the financial firewall in the mixed operation mode of China's financial industry, the development direction of financial supervision. The third part in the United States, Japan is the two largest contrast object, the overseas related financial firewall system experience, learn from each other, learn seriously The beneficial system is worth learning. In clear our existing mixed operation financial supervision system shortage situation, through selection, comparison, development paradigm of the financial firewall system to seek suitable for our country. The fourth part mainly introduces the mixed management of financial industry in China and China's current development situation, the related financial firewall system the legislative, judicial, law enforcement status and shortcomings of three aspects. Through legislation, law enforcement and supervision, financial consumer protection of small and medium shareholders and the firewall system and synergy coordination difficulties in four specific problems, to find out the development of China's financial industry and the financial firewall system what are the deficiencies. The fifth part, combined with our existing laws and the related system of extraterritorial, aiming at perfecting the financial firewall system proposed in two aspects, including the principle of legislation and practice of the financial firewall layer Specific methods of operation surface, as well as the law and discipline of firewall in China's financial legal system become perfect, can be more convenient and effective application in judicial practice. The financial management of China's financial industry trends in the international financial mixed, play a scale and guard against financial risks, the financial industry for health the orderly development of escort. Together with the development and evolution of China's financial industry, the regulatory scheme for their financial characteristics have gradually produced and perfect; the existing financial firewall system in our country has a certain development, but the fragmentation state regulators also lead to lack of coordination, our country has not yet formed a complete according to the modern mode of mixed operation of financial firewall legal system. It is currently China's financial firewall system development and improvement of the missing point, is the need to make up the short board on, Establish and improve the healthy development of the financial law can provide a powerful guarantee for the financial industry, so the development of the financial firewall system to improve the relevant laws to support and guide, and the construction of financial supervision law should have a central idea, which is along with the financial globalization tide in advance, the scale of development of China's financial industry is gradually expanding, the domestic foreign financial capital increasing competition situation, seeking the balance point in the safety and benefit is the priority among priorities can construct and perfect the Chinese characteristics of financial firewall legal system.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D922.28

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 呂無瑕;金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)問題探討[J];理論探索;2005年04期

2 喬榛;;評(píng)《金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)與中國(guó)金融業(yè)的選擇》[J];學(xué)理論;2008年08期

3 陳峰燕;對(duì)我國(guó)金融實(shí)行混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)的思考[J];兵團(tuán)黨校學(xué)報(bào);2003年01期

4 池啟水;國(guó)外金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)及其對(duì)我國(guó)的借鑒[J];工會(huì)論壇(山東省工會(huì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2003年06期

5 倪浩嫣;;論我國(guó)金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)監(jiān)管制度的完善[J];理論學(xué)刊;2006年07期

6 李祺;;論我國(guó)金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)的模式選擇及法律建構(gòu)[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年22期

7 張菁華;;論我國(guó)金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)及有關(guān)法律問題[J];法制與社會(huì);2006年23期

8 何影君;;金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)的可選模式以及各自的優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年01期

9 林建偉,朱艷欽;對(duì)當(dāng)前中國(guó)金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)的法律探索[J];福建金融;2003年07期

10 蔡琦;;我國(guó)金融業(yè)混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)路徑探討——以平安并購(gòu)深發(fā)展為例[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(上旬);2013年12期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 潘萬春;梁磊;;從銀證混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)模式的演化看我國(guó)銀證混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)的前景[A];管理科學(xué)與系統(tǒng)科學(xué)研究新進(jìn)展——第7屆全國(guó)青年管理科學(xué)與系統(tǒng)科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集[C];2003年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 莫開偉;金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)應(yīng)機(jī)制先行[N];上海金融報(bào);2013年

2 毛曉梅;金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)應(yīng)積極慎重推進(jìn)[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2004年

3 FN記者　 宋焱;金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)漸行漸近[N];金融時(shí)報(bào);2006年

4 記者 王輝;韓金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)開閘？[N];上海金融報(bào);2006年

5 端宏斌;防范金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)[N];中國(guó)證券報(bào);2009年

6 毛曉梅;金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)積極慎重推進(jìn)[N];中華合作時(shí)報(bào);2004年

7 丁春明;金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)須冷靜[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)消息報(bào);2000年

8 張桂華 王玲麗;關(guān)于我國(guó)金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)的冷思考[N];社會(huì)科學(xué)報(bào);2000年

9 ;金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)號(hào)角吹響[N];上海金融報(bào);2005年

10 邵小萌;金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)摸著石頭過河[N];證券時(shí)報(bào);2003年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 羅書章;中國(guó)金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)會(huì)計(jì)研究[D];天津財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2007年

2 肖振宇;金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)及其風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理研究[D];天津大學(xué);2004年

3 陳振福;論對(duì)金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)中利益沖突的法律規(guī)制[D];對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2006年

4 巫文勇;中國(guó)金融業(yè)監(jiān)管制度改革研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 陳芳;我國(guó)金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)監(jiān)管法律制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2014年

2 張鈞;構(gòu)建我國(guó)金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)監(jiān)管制度研究[D];廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué);2016年

3 朱其龍;金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)的理論與實(shí)踐[D];南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2004年

4 彭新;中國(guó)金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)問題初探[D];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2002年

5 魏永堅(jiān);關(guān)于中國(guó)金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)的初步探討[D];華中科技大學(xué);2004年

6 陸愛華;我國(guó)金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)與監(jiān)管研究[D];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2009年

7 羅仲勝;從金融功能理論看中國(guó)金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)改革[D];暨南大學(xué);2004年

8 程琪;美國(guó)金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2008年

9 宋媛媛;美國(guó)金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)制度變遷研究[D];河南大學(xué);2010年

10 曾憲冬;我國(guó)金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)新趨勢(shì)下監(jiān)管體制調(diào)整研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2003年

，

本文編號(hào)：1406133