本文關(guān)鍵詞：隴中黃土高原典型人工林土壤水文過程研究　出處：《蘭州大學(xué)》2016年博士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 隴中黃土高原 典型人工林 土壤水分入滲 土壤水文過程

【摘要】：植被與水分的關(guān)系問題是生態(tài)水文學(xué)研究的核心問題,正因?yàn)槿绱?生態(tài)水文學(xué)一經(jīng)提出便備受青睞,為干旱半干旱區(qū)以植被建設(shè)為主的生態(tài)恢復(fù)實(shí)踐提供了理論基礎(chǔ)。在水土流失十分嚴(yán)重的黃土高原地區(qū),植被恢復(fù)與重建迫切需要我們深入研究植物生長(zhǎng)與水分之間的相互關(guān)系。因此,本文以隴中黃土高原安家溝小流域?yàn)檠芯繀^(qū),以該區(qū)主要的水土保持樹種檸條、沙棘和油松為研究對(duì)象,緊緊圍繞土壤水文過程開展研究。首先收集了研究區(qū)近30年的降雨資料,分析了多年平均降雨分布格局,研究了整個(gè)小流域的土壤物理性質(zhì)及其土壤入滲過程;其次,建立了檸條、沙棘和油松的野外觀測(cè)樣地,對(duì)三種造林樹種的土壤水文過程進(jìn)行定位觀測(cè)�；趯�(shí)測(cè)數(shù)據(jù),以生態(tài)水文學(xué)的理論與方法,研究了檸條、沙棘和油松的冠層降雨截留特征、冠層蒸騰及林下土壤蒸發(fā)過程,然后對(duì)比分析三種造林樹種的土壤水文過程,以期為黃土高原生態(tài)重建中的適宜樹種的選擇提供理論依據(jù)。通過研究,主要結(jié)論如下:1.對(duì)安家溝小流域1981-2010的日降雨數(shù)據(jù)分析表明:生長(zhǎng)季年均降雨量為:271.56 mm,年際變異系數(shù)為29.14%。降雨事件以≤5mm的降雨為主,占全年降雨事件的44.55%,≥10mm的降雨頻率很低,但對(duì)年降雨的貢獻(xiàn)大,占降雨總量的64.87%。0-10d間隔期(無降雨日)所占比例最大,為年無降水期的87.03%,㧐10d間隔期呈增加趨勢(shì)。近30年來,≤5mm d-1的降雨呈下降趨勢(shì),而≥10mm d-1的降雨略有上升,年內(nèi)總降雨日數(shù)與降雨量均呈下降趨勢(shì)。2.研究區(qū)的土壤物理性質(zhì)及土壤入滲特征均受地形特征和植被類型的影響而具有空間異質(zhì)性。具體表現(xiàn)在:①陰坡的土壤有機(jī)質(zhì)、總孔隙度、毛管孔隙度和非毛管孔隙度均大于陽坡;陰坡的土壤容重小于陽坡;從整體來看,土壤容重從坡頂?shù)綔系妆憩F(xiàn)出高-低-高的變化規(guī)律�？偪紫抖取⒚芸紫抖群头敲芸紫抖葎t呈現(xiàn)出低-高-低的變化規(guī)律;②安家溝流域陰坡的初始入滲率小于陽坡,而穩(wěn)定入滲率和平均入滲率均大于陽坡;坡位對(duì)土壤水分入滲也有較大影響,具體表現(xiàn)為坡中坡上坡下坡頂溝底,這恰好與土壤容重在整個(gè)流域的分布相反。由此可見,除了坡度與坡向之外,土壤容也是土壤入滲的主要決定因子;③不同樹種入滲過程有明顯的差異性,針葉樹種的入滲率大于灌木樹種。初始入滲速率、穩(wěn)定入滲率、平均入滲率及60min累計(jì)入滲量的大小依次為:檸條沙棘油松。植被分布對(duì)土壤入滲過程的影響僅限于0-40cm的淺層土壤,對(duì)于60cm以下的深層土壤入滲影響不顯著。3.基于安家溝小流域三種植被類型(檸條、沙棘和油松)下的土壤入滲實(shí)測(cè)數(shù)據(jù),采用kostiakov公式、horton模型和philip模型進(jìn)行入滲過程擬合,結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn),horton模型對(duì)油松林下的土壤入滲過程模擬精度最好,相關(guān)系數(shù)可達(dá)0.92,但對(duì)檸條和沙棘林下的土壤入滲模擬效果差;kostiakov公式則能較好的模擬油松和檸條林下的入滲過程,但是對(duì)沙棘林下的入滲模擬精度不高;philip模型則對(duì)檸條、沙棘和油松的三種林下的土壤入滲模擬精度都比較高,因此,philip模型適合于安家溝小流域土壤入滲過程模擬。4.研究期間檸條、沙棘和油松的林冠截留率分別為28%、18.3%和22.4%,樹干莖流率分別為12.3%、8.4%和1.1%。灌木樹種的樹干莖流率大于針葉樹種油松的樹干莖流率。三種林分下穿透雨的變異系數(shù)均隨降雨量的增大而減小。采用gash解析模型對(duì)三種人工林的冠截留模擬結(jié)果表明:檸條、沙棘和油松的冠層截留量的模擬值均低于實(shí)測(cè)值。由于gash模型涉及的參數(shù)較多,因此,模型參數(shù)的估算的準(zhǔn)確性決定了冠層截留量的模擬精度。本研究以油松冠層截留模擬為例,做了模型參數(shù)敏感性分析,結(jié)果表明冠層持水能力s對(duì)模型有較大的敏感性,其次,林冠蓋度c及平均蒸發(fā)速率e也是影響冠層截留模擬的重要因子。5.油松在單株和樣方尺度上穿透雨具有相似的空間變異性,即穿透雨的空間異質(zhì)性隨著降雨量的增大而降低。在降雨量較小時(shí),冠層結(jié)構(gòu)是穿透雨的主要影響因子,而當(dāng)降雨量較大時(shí),測(cè)量誤差與其它非空間因素是影響穿透雨空間分布的主要因子。油松冠層邊緣對(duì)穿透雨具有匯聚作用。樹木的冠層結(jié)構(gòu)是促使邊緣效應(yīng)發(fā)生的主要因素。6.采用熱脈沖技術(shù)觀測(cè)了灌木樹種檸條、沙棘和油松單株的樹干液流量,基于單株蒸騰觀測(cè)的液流量,通過尺度上推(灌木林尺度上推的空間純量為葉面積指數(shù),喬木的空間純量為邊才面積)獲得了2013與2014年兩個(gè)生長(zhǎng)季林分尺度的日蒸騰量。其中,2013年油松、沙棘和檸條的蒸騰量分別為:305.09mm、243.17mm和203.4mm;2014油松、沙棘和檸條的蒸騰量分別為:251.24mm、220.02mm和189.35mm,由于2013年較2014年高溫多雨,2013年三種林分的蒸騰量均大于2014年。三種林分相比較而言,喬木的蒸騰量大于灌木,其中灌木林中,沙棘的蒸騰量大于檸條。樹木蒸騰量的變化主要受環(huán)境因子的影響,當(dāng)土壤水分充足時(shí),氣象因子中太陽輻射和飽和水汽壓差是主要影響因子,當(dāng)土壤水分脅迫時(shí),蒸騰主要受土壤水分的影響。檸條、沙棘與油松生態(tài)系統(tǒng)的土壤水量平衡分析表明,灌木樹種的蒸散耗水量小于油松,其中檸條蒸散的耗水量小于沙棘,三種造林樹種中,檸條具有更好的水土保持功能。
[Abstract]:The problem of relationship between vegetation and water is the core problem of eco hydrology, because of this, the eco hydrology was proposed favored, provides a theoretical basis for ecology in arid and semi arid area in the construction of vegetation restoration practice. Soil erosion is very serious in the Loess Plateau, vegetation restoration and reconstruction of the urgent need for our further study on the relationship between plant growth and soil moisture. Therefore, taking the Loess Plateau in Gansu Anjiagou watershed as the study area, the main area of soil and water conservation species Caragana, sea buckthorn and Pinus tabulaeformis as research object, focus on the research of soil hydrological processes. The first collection of nearly 30 years of rainfall data in the study area. Analysis of the distribution pattern of the average rainfall years, soil physical properties and soil infiltration process of the small watershed; secondly, the establishment of sea buckthorn Caragana, Pinus tabulaeformis and field view Test plots, soil hydrological processes of the three tree species were observed. Based on the measured data, the theory and method of eco hydrology, Caragana, canopy rainfall interception characteristics of sea buckthorn and Pinus tabulaeformis, canopy transpiration and soil evaporation of forest, and soil hydrological processes of the three tree species comparative analysis. In order to provide theoretical basis for suitable species ecological reconstruction in the Loess Plateau selection. Through the research, the main conclusions are as follows: 1. in Anjiagou catchment 1981-2010 daily rainfall data analysis shows that the growing season average annual rainfall is 271.56 mm, the interannual variation coefficient was less than 5mm in 29.14%. rainfall event rainfall, annual rainfall accounted for the 44.55% events, the rainfall frequency is greater than or equal to 10mm is very low, but the contribution of annual rainfall, rainfall accounted for 64.87%.0-10d of the total interval (no rain) is the largest proportion, for the period of 87.03% years without precipitation, ? 10d interval increased. Over the past 30 years, more than 5mm of D-1 rainfall decreased, while D-1 increased slightly more than 10mm years of total rainfall, rain days and rainfall decreased.2. in the study area soil physical properties and soil infiltration characteristics were affected by topography and vegetation types due to spatial heterogeneity. Specific performance in the shady slope soil organic matter, total porosity, capillary porosity and non capillary porosity were higher than that of sunny slope; soil bulk density was lower than that of sunny slope; on the whole, the soil bulk density showed a high - low - high variation from the top to the ditch. The total porosity, capillary porosity and non capillary porosity showed a low high low variation; the initial installation gully in shady slope infiltration rate lower than that of sunny slope, and the stable infiltration rate and average infiltration rate were higher than that of sunny slope; slope position on soil water infiltration also affected Specifically, uphill downhill slope in slope top ditch, which coincided with the soil bulk density distribution in the whole basin instead. Thus, in addition to slope gradient and slope direction, the main factor determining the capacity of soil and soil infiltration; the infiltration process of different species have obvious differences, the infiltration rate is higher than coniferous trees shrub species. The initial infiltration rate, stable infiltration rate, average infiltration rate and cumulative infiltration of the 60min size is as follows: Caragana Seabuckthorn Pinus tabulaeformis in shallow soil. Only 0-40cm distribution of vegetation effect on soil infiltration, the deep soil below 60cm infiltration did not significantly affect the Anjiagou small.3. the three is based on watershed planting types (Caragana, sea buckthorn and Pinus tabulaeformis) the soil infiltration measured data, using the Kostiakov formula, Horton model and Philip model of infiltration process fitting, results show that the Horton model of Pinus tabulaeformis forest under soil infiltration The best process simulation accuracy, the correlation coefficient was 0.92, but the c.korshinsk forest soil infiltration simulation effect; Kostiakov formula can better simulate the infiltration process of Pinus tabulaeformis and Caragana korshinskii, but of seabuckthorn forest infiltration under the simulation accuracy is not high; the Philip model of Caragana, three forest sea buckthorn and Pinus tabulaeformis under the soil infiltration simulation precision is high, therefore, the Philip model is suitable for Anjiagou watershed soil infiltration.4. simulation during the process of Hippophae rhamnoides and Caragana korshinskii, Pinus tabulaeformis forest canopy interception rate were 28%, 18.3% and 22.4%, stemflow were 12.3%, stemflow stemflow 8.4% 1.1%. and shrub species than coniferous tree species of Pinus tabulaeformis. The coefficient of variation of throughfall in three plantations were decreased with the increase of rainfall. By using gash analytical model of three kinds of artificial forest canopy interception simulation results showed that Caragana, sea buckthorn Canopy interception of Pinus tabulaeformis and the simulated values were lower than the measured value. Because of the many parameters involved in gash model so that the simulation precision accuracy of estimating model parameters determines the canopy interception. In this study, pine canopy interception simulation as an example, the model parameter sensitivity analysis results show that canopy water holding capacity of s have great sensitivity to model secondly, canopy cover C and the average rate of evaporation is an important factor affecting e canopy interception simulation in a single.5. of Pinus tabulaeformis and quadrat scale spatial variability of throughfall is similar, the throughfall spatial heterogeneity decreased. With the increase of rainfall in the low rainfall, canopy structure is the main influencing factor of throughfall, when the rainfall is bigger, the measurement error and other non spatial factors are the main factors of throughfall spatial distribution of Pinus tabulaeformis canopy throughfall on edge. With the convergence effect. The canopy structure of trees is the main factors contributing to the occurrence of.6. edge effect by the heat pulse observation of shrub species of Caragana, the sap flow of seabuckthorn and Pinus tabulaeformis plants, plant transpiration fluid flow based on the observation, by scaling (Bush scaling space scalar for leaf area index, tree the amount of space for pure edge area) to obtain evapotranspiration in 2013 and 2014 two quarter growth forest scale. Among them, the 2013 transpiration of Pinus tabulaeformis, Hippophae rhamnoides and Caragana korshinskii were: 305.09mm, 243.17mm and 203.4mm; 2014 Pinus tabulaeformis, transpiration of Hippophae rhamnoides and Caragana korshinskii were: 251.24mm, 220.02mm and 189.35mm. As of 2013 2014 compared with the high temperature and rainfall, evapotranspiration in 2013 three stands were higher than 2014. Three stands in comparison, transpiration of trees is larger than the shrubs, bushes, transpiration of sea buckthorn than Caragana tree. Influence of wood transpiration is mainly affected by environmental factors, when soil moisture is sufficient, solar radiation pressure and meteorological factors and saturated vapor is the main influencing factor, when the soil water stress, the transpiration effect is mainly affected by soil moisture. The soil water balance of sea buckthorn Caragana, and Pinus tabulaeformis ecosystem analysis showed that evapotranspiration of shrub species the water consumption is less than the evapotranspiration of Caragana Pinus tabulaeformis, the water consumption is less than three of sea buckthorn, afforestation, soil and water conservation function of Caragana has better.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：S714

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 白丹,李占斌,洪小康,蔡明;渾水入滲規(guī)律試驗(yàn)研究[J];土壤侵蝕與水土保持學(xué)報(bào);1999年01期

2 費(fèi)良軍;渾水間歇入滲特性研究[J];西安理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1995年04期

3 侯秀麗;付登高;閻凱;李博;段昌群;;滇中不同植被恢復(fù)策略下土壤入滲性能及其影響因素[J];山地學(xué)報(bào);2013年03期

4 梁定偉;對(duì)入滲補(bǔ)給模型的一些看法[J];地球科學(xué);1985年01期

5 樊貴盛;黨志良;;土壤間歇入滲特性的大田試驗(yàn)研究[J];水資源與水工程學(xué)報(bào);1992年04期

6 劉賢趙,康紹忠;連續(xù)與間歇積水入滲對(duì)比試驗(yàn)研究[J];水科學(xué)進(jìn)展;1999年01期

7 楊永輝;趙世偉;雷廷武;吳金水;劉汗;趙軍;趙勇鋼;;耕作對(duì)土壤入滲性能的影響[J];生態(tài)學(xué)報(bào);2006年05期

8 孫西歡;王文焰;;多參數(shù)溝灌入滲模型的試驗(yàn)研究[J];水資源與水工程學(xué)報(bào);1993年03期

9 羅朋;;入滲水頭對(duì)鹽堿土水分運(yùn)移影響數(shù)值模擬研究[J];山西水利;2010年08期

10 呂華芳;叢振濤;;土壤入滲測(cè)定教學(xué)實(shí)驗(yàn)裝置設(shè)計(jì)[J];實(shí)驗(yàn)技術(shù)與管理;2012年09期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 吳軍虎;;周期供水時(shí)間對(duì)肥液間歇入滲水氮運(yùn)移特性影響[A];紀(jì)念中國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)工程學(xué)會(huì)成立30周年暨中國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)工程學(xué)會(huì)2009年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)（CSAE 2009）論文集[C];2009年

2 鄒翔;崔鵬;張平倉(cāng);;小江流域的土壤入滲研究[A];節(jié)能環(huán)保 和諧發(fā)展——2007中國(guó)科協(xié)年會(huì)論文集（三）[C];2007年

3 李治軍;薛彥東;;土壤入滲試驗(yàn)研究進(jìn)展[A];寒區(qū)水資源研究[C];2008年

4 任運(yùn)剛;;兩種入滲研究方法對(duì)比分析[A];重慶市水利學(xué)會(huì)2009年年會(huì)優(yōu)秀論文匯編[C];2009年

5 史曉楠;王全九;葉海燕;蘇瑩;;微咸水水質(zhì)對(duì)土壤入滲特征影響分析[A];農(nóng)業(yè)工程科技創(chuàng)新與建設(shè)現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)——2005年中國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)工程學(xué)會(huì)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集第二分冊(cè)[C];2005年

6 費(fèi)良軍;朱興華;;不同施肥方式的單膜孔點(diǎn)源入滲水肥運(yùn)移特性研究[A];農(nóng)業(yè)工程科技創(chuàng)新與建設(shè)現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)——2005年中國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)工程學(xué)會(huì)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集第二分冊(cè)[C];2005年

7 周宏飛;湯英;周寶佳;;荒漠灌木及凍融影響下的風(fēng)沙土入滲特征[A];土壤資源持續(xù)利用和生態(tài)環(huán)境安全——中國(guó)土壤學(xué)會(huì)第十一屆二次理事擴(kuò)大會(huì)議暨學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集[C];2009年

8 李建文;孫西歡;;黃河床面入滲窗口的統(tǒng)計(jì)分析[A];第二十屆全國(guó)水動(dòng)力學(xué)研討會(huì)文集[C];2007年

9 王輝;王全九;姚幫忪;;PAM用量及施加方式對(duì)積水垂直入滲特征影響[A];紀(jì)念中國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)工程學(xué)會(huì)成立30周年暨中國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)工程學(xué)會(huì)2009年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)（CSAE 2009）論文集[C];2009年

10 楊賓;李方;白星廣;李國(guó)杰;王廷濤;張海秀;林云青;伍斌;李慧穎;杜曉明;李發(fā)生;韓清潔;陳有志;;多孔介質(zhì)中溶質(zhì)類污染物的入滲與淋洗實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[A];2014中國(guó)環(huán)境科學(xué)學(xué)會(huì)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集（第五章）[C];2014年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 趙龍山;黃土坡地地表糙度特征及其對(duì)入滲、產(chǎn)流產(chǎn)沙的影響研究[D];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué);2015年

2 方書敏;隴中黃土高原典型人工林土壤水文過程研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2016年

3 李紅星;基于點(diǎn)入滲參數(shù)計(jì)算土渠床滲漏損失的方法研究[D];太原理工大學(xué);2010年

4 張建豐;黃土區(qū)層狀土入滲特性及其指流的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[D];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué);2004年

5 王建新;降雨非飽和入滲過程的水勢(shì)描述及理論模型研究與應(yīng)用[D];清華大學(xué);2010年

6 董玉云;膜孔入滲土壤水氮運(yùn)移特性試驗(yàn)與數(shù)值模擬[D];西安理工大學(xué);2007年

7 原林虎;PHILIP入滲模型參數(shù)預(yù)報(bào)模型研究與應(yīng)用[D];太原理工大學(xué);2013年

8 李援農(nóng);不同灌溉方式入滲條件下的土壤空氣阻滲特性試驗(yàn)研究[D];西安理工大學(xué);2007年

9 馬世國(guó);強(qiáng)降雨條件下基于Green-Ampt入滲模型的無限邊坡穩(wěn)定性研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2014年

10 脫云飛;膜孔灌土壤氮素運(yùn)移轉(zhuǎn)化特性試驗(yàn)與數(shù)值模擬研究[D];西安理工大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 李遠(yuǎn);基于HYDRUS模型的一維及三維入滲條件下土壤水鹽運(yùn)移規(guī)律研究[D];石河子大學(xué);2015年

2 梁樹;不同降雨條件下成都粘土基坑邊坡入滲深度的研究[D];西南交通大學(xué);2015年

3 楊霄;關(guān)中地區(qū)城市下墊面雨水入滲性能的研究[D];西安建筑科技大學(xué);2015年

4 莫斌;紫色土區(qū)不同入滲測(cè)定方法應(yīng)用研究[D];西南大學(xué);2015年

5 安倩;呂梁方山不同土地利用類型土壤入滲性能對(duì)比研究[D];山西農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2015年

6 吉愛麗;摻土鋁渣入滲規(guī)律研究[D];山西農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2015年

7 呂志備;不同坡度、容重和覆蓋對(duì)坡面水土流失及入滲的影響研究[D];山西農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2015年

8 汪聰;不同防護(hù)形式對(duì)于土質(zhì)邊坡雨水入滲的試驗(yàn)研究[D];長(zhǎng)沙理工大學(xué);2014年

9 李愛平;改良材料對(duì)土壤入滲和水分特征影響的試驗(yàn)研究[D];南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2014年

10 李寧寧;季節(jié)性河道非飽和入滲室內(nèi)試驗(yàn)研究[D];青島理工大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：1357293