本文選題：知識產(chǎn)權(quán)　切入點：公共服務(wù)　出處：《中國財政科學(xué)研究院》2016年博士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動發(fā)展是世界經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的必然趨勢。中國正進入建設(shè)創(chuàng)新型國家的關(guān)鍵時期。資源、環(huán)境、產(chǎn)能過剩等瓶頸凸顯,創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動發(fā)展既是形勢所迫,又是構(gòu)建創(chuàng)新型國家的必由之路。知識是創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動中最核心的因素,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)日益成為國家發(fā)展的戰(zhàn)略性資源和國際競爭力的核心要素,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)發(fā)展是創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動的關(guān)鍵途徑和手段。自2008年《國家知識產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略》頒布后,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)得到了一定程度發(fā)展：知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法律法規(guī)日臻完善、知識產(chǎn)權(quán)創(chuàng)造和運用能力大幅度提升、知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護水平不斷提高、知識產(chǎn)權(quán)建設(shè)的社會環(huán)境明顯改善、全社會知識產(chǎn)權(quán)意識明顯增強。但與之相伴的是：知識產(chǎn)權(quán)創(chuàng)造“大而不強,多而不優(yōu)”、成果轉(zhuǎn)化率和產(chǎn)業(yè)化率較低、區(qū)域知識產(chǎn)權(quán)發(fā)展不平衡、知識產(chǎn)權(quán)國際化程度低等情況長期存在。知識產(chǎn)權(quán)發(fā)展需要依靠全社會的力量來推動,政府是實現(xiàn)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)發(fā)展的重要力量。在市場失靈環(huán)節(jié),需要政府進行干預(yù),其中,公共服務(wù)是重要手段。在知識產(chǎn)權(quán)創(chuàng)造、運用、保護、管理和服務(wù)等環(huán)節(jié),需要政府為知識產(chǎn)權(quán)發(fā)展提供良好的制度和公共物品等供給。政府通過提供公共服務(wù),履行支出責(zé)任,對推動知識產(chǎn)權(quán)發(fā)展,加快創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動有著重要的意義。1994年的分稅制改革對劃分政府間財政關(guān)系有著十分重要的影響,但它更多關(guān)注了分稅、分財,對政府和市場、各級政府間的職能分工并不明確,尤其對地方政府間的職能和支出責(zé)任缺乏明確劃分。要使政府合理承擔(dān)支出責(zé)任,使之符合知識產(chǎn)權(quán)公共服務(wù)的需要,需要在明確政府和市場邊界基礎(chǔ)上,科學(xué)界定各級政府的事權(quán)和支出責(zé)任。知識產(chǎn)權(quán)公共服務(wù)中的政府支出責(zé)任研究主要涉及三方面：一是正確處理政府和市場間關(guān)系,明確界定政府事權(quán)；二是政府支出責(zé)任在各級政府劃分,包括中央和地方的劃分、省以下政府之間的劃分；三是支出責(zé)任履行對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)公共服務(wù)所帶來的效應(yīng)考察,這是支出責(zé)任的應(yīng)有之義。依據(jù)以上背景和思路,本文試圖回答的問題為：第一,我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)公共服務(wù)的內(nèi)涵及外延是什么?第二,政府支出責(zé)任在知識產(chǎn)權(quán)公共服務(wù)中的現(xiàn)狀和問題是什么?第三,政府支出責(zé)任履行對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)公共服務(wù)的影響如何?第四,在創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動視角下,如何優(yōu)化政府支出責(zé)任以促進知識產(chǎn)權(quán)公共服務(wù)水平提高?回答上述問題的關(guān)鍵,在于運用事權(quán)理論分析知識產(chǎn)權(quán)創(chuàng)造、運用、保護、管理和服務(wù)五個知識產(chǎn)權(quán)發(fā)展環(huán)節(jié)支出責(zé)任情況及效應(yīng)。本文的主要研究如下：1.知識產(chǎn)權(quán)公共服務(wù)的本質(zhì)屬性及范圍界定。從知識產(chǎn)權(quán)理論內(nèi)涵開始,深入剖析了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的公共政策性,闡述了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)公共物品屬性；運用系統(tǒng)化分析方法,通過對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)創(chuàng)造、運用、保護、管理和服務(wù)等五個系統(tǒng)要素分析,對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)公共服務(wù)邊界做了界定。2.政府支出責(zé)任履行現(xiàn)狀與問題分析。運用事權(quán)理論分析框架,以公共服務(wù)事權(quán)與支出責(zé)任匹配為視角,分析了在知識產(chǎn)權(quán)公共服務(wù)領(lǐng)域,政府支出責(zé)任履行存在越位、缺位和錯位的不同情形以及形成原因。3.知識產(chǎn)權(quán)公共服務(wù)的影響因素分析。基于政府支出責(zé)任角度,構(gòu)建面板數(shù)據(jù)模型,通過知識產(chǎn)權(quán)政府支出數(shù)據(jù),及經(jīng)濟發(fā)展水平等有代表性的控制變量,測量政府支出等支出責(zé)任要素對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)公共服務(wù)影響的效應(yīng)。實證結(jié)果表明,政府知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護、管理和服務(wù)支出對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)公共服務(wù)具有顯著正相關(guān)關(guān)系。市場創(chuàng)新環(huán)境和中央地方支出責(zé)任劃分對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)公共服務(wù)影響不顯著,其原因在于政府本身體制機制缺陷。4.政府支出責(zé)任界定的國際經(jīng)驗借鑒。分別考察了美國、日本、韓國和印度為代表的發(fā)達國家和發(fā)展中國家在知識產(chǎn)權(quán)公共服務(wù)中的政府支出責(zé)任范圍,分析了他們支出責(zé)任履行及劃分背后的邏輯,得出對我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)公共服務(wù)中政府支出責(zé)任履行及劃分的經(jīng)驗啟示。5.完善知識產(chǎn)權(quán)公共服務(wù)中政府支出責(zé)任的思路與措施。提出了優(yōu)化支出責(zé)任整體思路、目標和原則,并按照功能和項目方法分別對我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)公共服務(wù)政府間支出責(zé)任做了界定；探索對現(xiàn)有體制機制框架的變革,以使政府支出責(zé)任與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)公共服務(wù)事權(quán)相適應(yīng)。
[Abstract]:Innovation driven development is the inevitable trend of world economic development. China is entering a critical period of building an innovative country. Resources and environment, overcapacity and other bottlenecks highlighted, innovation driven development is a situation that is also building the only way which must be passed an innovation oriented country. Knowledge is the core factor in driving innovation, intellectual property is becoming the core elements of a strategic resource for national development and international competitiveness, the development of intellectual property is a key approach to innovation driven and means. Since 2008 national intellectual property strategy > > promulgated, intellectual property has been a certain degree of development: intellectual property laws and regulations perfection, intellectual property creation and application capabilities greatly enhance the level of intellectual property rights continuously improve the construction of intellectual property rights protection, the social environment improved significantly enhanced public awareness of intellectual property rights. But are associated with intellectual property: The right to create a "big but not strong, more than excellent, transformation rate and low rates of industrialization of IPR, regional development is not balanced, the low degree of internationalization of intellectual property rights situation exists for a long time. The development of intellectual property need to rely on the strength of the whole society to promote the government, is an important force to achieve the development of intellectual property in the market. Link failure, need government intervention, which is an important means of public service. In the creation of intellectual property, use, protection, management and services, the need for government to provide a good development of intellectual property system and public goods supply. The government through the provision of public services, to fulfill the expenditure responsibilities, to promote the development of intellectual property, speed up innovation plays an important role in.1994 reform of the tax system has a very important effect on the division of intergovernmental fiscal relations, but it pays more attention to the tax, wealth, the government and the market, The division of functions between all levels of government is not clear, especially the lack of a clear division between local government functions and expenditure responsibility. The government should undertake reasonable expenditure responsibilities, to meet the needs of the intellectual property rights of public service, the government and the market need in the clear boundary on the basis of the scientific definition of all levels of government powers and expenditure responsibilities of government spending. The responsibility of intellectual property rights in public service mainly involves three aspects: one is to correctly handle the relationship between government and market, clearly defined government duties; two is the government expenditure responsibilities at all levels of government division, including the division of the central and local government, below the provincial division between the three is the expenditure responsibility; effect brought about by the intellectual property rights of public service the investigation, this is the meaning of expenditure responsibilities. According to the above background and ideas, this paper tried to answer the questions as follows: first, China's intellectual property rights of the public What is the connotation and extension of service? Second, what is the current situation and problems of government expenditure liability in intellectual property right in public services? Third, government expenditure responsibility to fulfill the effect of public service of intellectual property rights? Fourth, in innovation driven perspective, how to optimize the government expenditure responsibility to promote intellectual property services to improve the level of public key? To answer the above questions, the theoretical analysis is the use of powers of intellectual property creation, use, protection, expenditure responsibility management and service of five intellectual property development process and effect. The main results are as follows: 1. the intellectual property rights of public service the nature and scope of intellectual property. Starting from the theoretical connotation, in-depth analysis of public policy intellectual property rights, expounds the intellectual property attribute of public goods; the use of systematic analysis method, through the creation of intellectual property protection, management and use. Analysis and service five system elements, defines the.2. government expenditure responsibility analysis of the status quo and problems of intellectual property rights of public service. Using the powers boundary theory framework, based on public service responsibility and expenditure, from the perspective of analysis on intellectual property rights in public services, government expenditure responsibility is offside, analysis of different the situation of vacancy and dislocation and the formation reasons affecting the intellectual property of.3. public service factors. The angle of government expenditure responsibility based on constructing a panel data model, through the intellectual property of government expenditure data, and the economic development level of a control variable representative, effect measurement of government spending expenditure responsibility elements of intellectual property rights of public service effects. The empirical results show that the protection of intellectual property, intellectual property management and services spending on public services has a significant positive correlation between the market hit. The new environment and central local expenditure responsibilities of public service of intellectual property rights is not significantly affected, the reason is that the international experience of expenditure responsibility limits the government itself institutional defects in.4. were investigated. The government from the United States, Japan, South Korea and India government expenditure responsibilities as a representative of the developed countries and developing countries in intellectual property rights in public service. The analysis of their expenditure responsibility and the division of the logic behind, draw on the ideas and measures of the government of China's intellectual property rights in the public service expenditure responsibility and the division of the experience and Enlightenment of.5. improve the intellectual property in the government public service expenditure responsibilities. Proposed to optimize the expenditure responsibility overall design ideas, objectives and principles, and in accordance with the function and method of the project respectively. On the expenditure responsibility of intellectual property in our country public service government defines the framework of the existing system; to explore the mechanism of change, In order to adapt the responsibility of government expenditure to the right of public service of intellectual property.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國財政科學(xué)研究院
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：F204;F812.45

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 傅才武;宋文玉;;創(chuàng)新我國文化領(lǐng)域事權(quán)與支出責(zé)任劃分理論及政策研究[J];山東大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2015年06期

2 張德勇;;政府間事權(quán)與支出責(zé)任劃分的難點和對策[J];中國國情國力;2015年09期

3 方鑄;常斌;;建立事權(quán)與支出責(zé)任相適應(yīng)的財政制度[J];經(jīng)營管理者;2015年23期

4 靳繼東;;政府間事權(quán)與財力匹配改革的法治思路[J];稅務(wù)研究;2015年07期

5 李春根;舒成;;基于路徑優(yōu)化的我國地方政府間事權(quán)和支出責(zé)任再劃分[J];財政研究;2015年06期

6 于樹一;;論國家治理框架下事權(quán)和支出責(zé)任相適應(yīng)的政府間財政關(guān)系[J];地方財政研究;2015年05期

7 盧洪友;張楠;;政府間事權(quán)和支出責(zé)任的錯配與匹配[J];地方財政研究;2015年05期

8 寇明風(fēng);;政府間事權(quán)與支出責(zé)任劃分研究述評[J];地方財政研究;2015年05期

9 楊龍見;尹恒;;縣級政府財力與支出責(zé)任:來自財政層級的視角[J];金融研究;2015年04期

10 李欣;余貞利;劉尚希;韓鳳芹;鄢曉發(fā);李成威;樊軼俠;張明喜;趙偉;;中央地方科技事權(quán)與支出責(zé)任的劃分研究[J];經(jīng)濟研究參考;2015年22期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 周杰;中央與地方事權(quán)劃分的風(fēng)險原因研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2013年

2 苗慧;地方財政科技投入效率評價研究[D];大連理工大學(xué);2013年

3 王鵬;財政轉(zhuǎn)移支付制度改革研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2012年

4 趙永輝;我國高等教育支出責(zé)任與財力保障的匹配研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2012年

5 林海波;中國財政科技投入效率研究[D];遼寧大學(xué);2011年

6 孫緒華;我國科技資源配置的實證分析與效率評價[D];華中農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 張寶玉;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略與我國貿(mào)易應(yīng)對策略研究[D];山東大學(xué);2010年

2 趙昭;我國區(qū)域知識產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略績效評價研究[D];合肥工業(yè)大學(xué);2007年

3 高藝漩;高新技術(shù)企業(yè)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略與核心競爭力研究[D];西安電子科技大學(xué);2007年

4 李月明;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略與國際競爭力問題研究[D];山東大學(xué);2006年

5 翁建興;美日技術(shù)型跨國企業(yè)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略探析[D];長沙理工大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號：1634053