發(fā)布時間：2023-03-07 10:32

　　本研究旨在探討倫理型領(lǐng)導(dǎo)對員工工作績效(包括任務(wù)績效、組織公民行為和創(chuàng)造力)的影響。本研究將心理安全感和心理所有權(quán)作為中介變量,并將領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者成員交換作為調(diào)節(jié)變量,以檢驗倫理型領(lǐng)導(dǎo)與工作績效之間的關(guān)系。本研究采用問卷調(diào)查的方法,對山東省和華東地區(qū)的酒店進行問卷收集,數(shù)據(jù)來源于特定酒店的員工和領(lǐng)導(dǎo)。實證結(jié)果表明,倫理型領(lǐng)導(dǎo)對任務(wù)績效、組織公民行為和創(chuàng)造力具有顯著的正向影響。此外,研究還發(fā)現(xiàn),心理安全感和心理所有權(quán)在倫理型領(lǐng)導(dǎo)與任務(wù)績效、組織公民行為和創(chuàng)造力之間起到中介作用。研究結(jié)果還表明,領(lǐng)導(dǎo)成員交換調(diào)節(jié)了倫理型領(lǐng)導(dǎo)、心理安全感與心理所有權(quán)之間的關(guān)系,該結(jié)果可以幫助管理者了解酒店員工心理安全感與心理所有權(quán)的重要性,并指出酒店管理需要建立合適的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)成員交流機制以有效地管理組織的信息系統(tǒng)。本研究還強調(diào)了有效的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)風(fēng)格(倫理型領(lǐng)導(dǎo))在服務(wù)型行業(yè)中積極影響工作績效的重要性�？傮w來說,通過表明心理安全感、心理所有權(quán)和領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者成員交換是影響倫理型領(lǐng)導(dǎo)對工作績效影響程度重要且最相關(guān)的變量,本文對現(xiàn)有關(guān)于倫理型領(lǐng)導(dǎo)和工作績效的研究有一定的貢獻。

【文章頁數(shù)】：183 頁

【學(xué)位級別】：博士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
List of abbreviations
CHAPTER1:INTRODUCTION
    1.1 Introduction
    1.2 Research Objectives
    1.3 Research Questions
    1.4 Significance of the dissertation
    1.5 Theoretical Support
        1.5.1 Social Exchange Theory(SET)
        1.5.2 Social Learning Theory
        1.5.3 Leader Member Exchange(LMX)
    1.6 Dissertation structure
    1.7 Plan of work
    1.8 Operational definitions of the important concepts
CHAPTER2:LITERATURE REVIEW
    2.1 Ethical leadership,task performance,OCB and creativity
    2.2 Ethical leadership and psychological safety(PS)
    2.3 Ethical leadership(EL)and psychological ownership(PO)
    2.4 Psychological Safety(PS),Task Performance(TP),OCB and Creativity
    2.5 Psychological ownership(PO),task performance(TP),OCB and creativity
    2.6 Psychological safety as a mediator among ethical leadership,task performance,OCB and creativity
    2.7 Psychological ownership as a mediator among ethical leadership,task performance,OCB and creativity
    2.8 LMX as a moderator between ethical leadership(EL)and psychological safety(PS)
    2.9 LMX as a moderator among ethical leadership and psychological ownership
    2.10 Moderated Mediation
    2.11 Research Model
CHAPTER3:RESEARCH DESIGN
    3.1 Research Settings
    3.2 Assumptions of social science research
        3.2.1 Ontology
        3.2.2 Epistemology
        3.2.3 Human nature
        3.2.4 Methodology
    3.3 The regulation and radical change dimension
        3.3.1 Functionalist
        3.3.2 Interpretive
        3.3.3 Radical humanist
        3.3.4 Radical Structuralist
    3.4 Research assumptions behind this dissertation
    3.5 Data & Sampling
    3.6 Measurements
CHAPTER4:EMPIRICAL RESULTS
    4.1 Method of Analysis
    4.2 Confirmatory Factor Analysis
    4.3 Descriptive Statistics and Correlations
    4.4 Hypothesis testing for direct and Mediation effect
    4.5 Hypothesis testing for Moderation effect
    4.6 Moderated mediation analyses
CHAPTER5:DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
    5.1 Discussion
    5.2 Contributions of the Dissertation
    5.3 Conclusion
    5.4 Theoretical Implications:
    5.5 Practical Implications:
    5.6 Limitations and Future Research Directions
Appendices
    Cover Letter
    Appendix A Questionnaire of the study-subordinates questionnaire
    Appendix B
References
Acknowledgements
個人簡歷



本文編號：3757435