本文關(guān)鍵詞：供應(yīng)鏈企業(yè)間知識(shí)共享對(duì)智力資本的作用機(jī)制研究　出處：《昆明理工大學(xué)》2017年博士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 知識(shí)共享 智力資本 供應(yīng)鏈 企業(yè)間

【摘要】：在知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)代,知識(shí)資源改變了衡量企業(yè)綜合實(shí)力的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和競(jìng)爭(zhēng)規(guī)則,知識(shí)作為資本成為了企業(yè)的重要資產(chǎn),企業(yè)可持續(xù)發(fā)展和創(chuàng)新能力的提升越來越依賴于智力資本,智力資本將成為企業(yè)創(chuàng)造效益的主導(dǎo)資源。同時(shí),供應(yīng)鏈作為企業(yè)內(nèi)外資源進(jìn)行有效整合的運(yùn)營(yíng)模式,已經(jīng)得到廣泛和快速的發(fā)展,企業(yè)之間的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)已逐漸轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)楣⿷?yīng)鏈與供應(yīng)鏈之間的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)。智力資本是競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的焦點(diǎn)和核心,而供應(yīng)鏈?zhǔn)歉?jìng)爭(zhēng)的模式和方法,二者有何聯(lián)系,國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者普遍認(rèn)可智力資本和績(jī)效之間的正向關(guān)系,同時(shí)也認(rèn)可提升智力資本的重點(diǎn)就是開展有效的知識(shí)共享;二者是相互作用、相互促進(jìn)、相互滲透、相互制約的耦合關(guān)系。如何針對(duì)供應(yīng)鏈組織模式的特性,充分發(fā)揮其組織優(yōu)勢(shì),通過知識(shí)共享提升智力資本的增量,本文將試圖對(duì)其中的內(nèi)涵機(jī)理進(jìn)行深入的探討和研究。供應(yīng)鏈?zhǔn)且环N鏈狀的網(wǎng)式結(jié)構(gòu),企業(yè)之間存在著物流、資金流、信息流和知識(shí)流。供應(yīng)鏈企業(yè)間低層次的合作偏向于物流,而高層次的合作則側(cè)重于知識(shí)流,通過知識(shí)流的順暢流動(dòng),實(shí)現(xiàn)知識(shí)的轉(zhuǎn)移和共享,提高企業(yè)合作的績(jī)效。廣義來說,供應(yīng)鏈也是一種共享模式,是企業(yè)資源的合作和共享,所以在共享的組織情景下實(shí)現(xiàn)知識(shí)共享,是供應(yīng)鏈合作的縱深發(fā)展。然而,供應(yīng)鏈企業(yè)分別屬于不同利益主體,企業(yè)間的關(guān)系緊密度、互補(bǔ)性等方面均不相同,成員企業(yè)無論是基礎(chǔ)、規(guī)模、目標(biāo),還是對(duì)智力資本的需求、手段、能力等方面均存在較大差異;同時(shí),知識(shí)本身的復(fù)雜性、默會(huì)性、粘著性等特性,以及知識(shí)主體的意愿和動(dòng)機(jī)等因素,都會(huì)較大程度地影響知識(shí)轉(zhuǎn)移和共享的成效。供應(yīng)鏈企業(yè)間的知識(shí)流在一般條件下自然流動(dòng),很大程度上會(huì)有"搭便車"等行為,需要一定的約束機(jī)制。所以,研究供應(yīng)鏈企業(yè)間知識(shí)共享的影響因素,建構(gòu)合理的知識(shí)共享機(jī)制,采用科學(xué)的管理方式,促進(jìn)知識(shí)共享工作的有效開展,從而提高企業(yè)的智力資本,是本文研究的重點(diǎn)和目標(biāo)�；谝陨�,在廣泛參閱國(guó)內(nèi)外關(guān)于供應(yīng)鏈知識(shí)共享及智力資本的研究動(dòng)態(tài)的基礎(chǔ)上,深入開展供應(yīng)鏈企業(yè)訪談?wù){(diào)研,獲取翔實(shí)的樣本數(shù)據(jù),以智力資本為目標(biāo)導(dǎo)向,重新審視供應(yīng)鏈企業(yè)間知識(shí)共享機(jī)理,.提出知識(shí)共享與智力資本之間的關(guān)系假設(shè),構(gòu)建理論模型及各因素變量的維度和測(cè)項(xiàng),通過預(yù)測(cè)試信度分析,進(jìn)行相關(guān)量表開發(fā),完善問卷調(diào)查表;問卷調(diào)查以國(guó)內(nèi)物流裝備產(chǎn)業(yè)供應(yīng)鏈企業(yè)為對(duì)象,獲得較為全面和完整的截面數(shù)據(jù),通過探索性因子分析、驗(yàn)證性因子分析確定模型變量的效度,分別進(jìn)行主效應(yīng)、中介效應(yīng)和調(diào)節(jié)效應(yīng)的結(jié)構(gòu)方程模型分析,對(duì)理論模型中變量路徑關(guān)系進(jìn)行檢驗(yàn),得出供應(yīng)鏈企業(yè)間知識(shí)共享作用于智力資本的主效應(yīng)、中介效應(yīng)和調(diào)節(jié)效應(yīng)機(jī)制;在靜態(tài)機(jī)制研究的.基礎(chǔ)上,構(gòu)建了供應(yīng)鏈知識(shí)共享主體、共享意愿和智力資本的協(xié)同演化系統(tǒng),分析系統(tǒng)的自組織特性及協(xié)同演化機(jī)理,說明系統(tǒng)滿足通過協(xié)同理論分析演進(jìn)規(guī)律和特點(diǎn)的條件,然后借鑒復(fù)雜系統(tǒng)理論的經(jīng)典"B-Z"反應(yīng)分析模型,構(gòu)建了系統(tǒng)的演化方程組,并借助Matlab仿真分析軟件,從不同假設(shè)條件下得出共享主體、共享意愿與智力資本的演化軌跡,經(jīng)過綜合分析,得出供應(yīng)鏈企業(yè)間知識(shí)共享作用于智力資本協(xié)同演化動(dòng)態(tài)機(jī)制。本文將理性行為理論、社會(huì)影響理論及自組織協(xié)同學(xué)理論有機(jī)結(jié)合,重新梳理供應(yīng)鏈企業(yè)間的知識(shí)共享影響因素與智力資本的邏輯關(guān)系,以及知識(shí)共享主體、共享意愿和智力資本的協(xié)同關(guān)系;通過定性與定量相結(jié)合,靜態(tài)機(jī)制與動(dòng)態(tài)機(jī)制研究相結(jié)合,進(jìn)一步挖掘促進(jìn)共享效果的內(nèi)在機(jī)理,提煉出利于智力資本提升的主要機(jī)制,創(chuàng)新成果主要如下:(1)將知識(shí)共享與智力資本兩個(gè)研究領(lǐng)域結(jié)合,構(gòu)建了供應(yīng)鏈企業(yè)間知識(shí)共享作用于智力資本的關(guān)系模型,以及供應(yīng)鏈知識(shí)共享作用于智力資本的結(jié)構(gòu)方程模型。(2)構(gòu)建了供應(yīng)鏈知識(shí)共享主體、共享意愿和智力資本的自組織協(xié)同模型,通過對(duì)演化方程的仿真,分析了供應(yīng)鏈知識(shí)共享作用于智力資本的動(dòng)態(tài)機(jī)制。(3)將經(jīng)典的"B-Z"三維分析模型推廣到供應(yīng)鏈知識(shí)共享研究領(lǐng)域,為探討供應(yīng)鏈企業(yè)間知識(shí)共享對(duì)智力資本的作用機(jī)制研究提供了新的思路。上述研究過程及結(jié)論成果,對(duì)于進(jìn)一步闡明供應(yīng)鏈企業(yè)間知識(shí)共享對(duì)智力資本的影響和作用機(jī)理,拓展知識(shí)管理方法,豐富供應(yīng)鏈管理內(nèi)涵,均具有積極的學(xué)術(shù)意義和實(shí)踐意義。
[Abstract]:In the era of knowledge economy, knowledge resources, changing the measure of comprehensive strength of the enterprise standards and the rules of competition, knowledge as capital has become an important asset of enterprises, enterprise sustainable development and promoting innovation ability increasingly depends on intellectual capital, intellectual capital will become a leading enterprise resource benefit. At the same time, the supply chain as the internal and external resources the effective integration of the business model, has been developed widely and rapidly, the competition between enterprises has changed between supply chain and supply chain competition. Intellectual capital is the focus of the competition and the core, and the supply chain mode and means of competition, what is the relationship between the two, domestic and foreign scholars generally recognized the positive the relationship between intellectual capital and performance, but also focus on enhancing the recognition of intellectual capital is to carry out effective knowledge sharing; the two is the interaction, mutual promotion and mutual infiltration Through the coupling relationship of mutual constraints. According to the characteristics of supply chain organization model, give full play to the advantages of the organization, enhance the increment of intellectual capital through knowledge sharing, this paper attempts to conduct in-depth exploration and Study on the mechanism of the connotation of supply chain is a chain network structure, the existence of logistics, between enterprises capital flow, information flow and knowledge flow among enterprises in supply chain. The low level of cooperation in favor of logistics, and the high level of cooperation will focus on the smooth flow of knowledge flow, knowledge flow, knowledge transfer and sharing, improve enterprise cooperation performance. In general, the supply chain is a kind of sharing pattern. Is the enterprise resource cooperation and sharing, so to realize knowledge sharing in the shared organizational context, supply chain cooperation development. However, the supply chain enterprises belong to different stakeholders, relationship between enterprises closely The degree of complementarity, etc. are not the same, whether members of the enterprise is the foundation, scale, target, or intellectual capital needs, means, ability and other aspects are quite different; at the same time, the complexity of knowledge, tacit, characteristics of adhesion, and the body of knowledge of the willingness and motivation factors are will greatly influence the knowledge transfer and sharing the results. The natural flow under general conditions between enterprises of supply chain knowledge, there will be a "free rider" behavior to a large extent, need certain constraint mechanism. Therefore, the influencing factors of knowledge sharing of supply chain between enterprises, to construct a reasonable knowledge sharing mechanism and adopt scientific management methods, to promote the knowledge sharing, so as to improve the enterprise's intellectual capital, is the focus and objectives of this paper. Based on the above, in a wide range of home and abroad about the supply chain knowledge sharing and wisdom Based on the research of dynamic force capital, carry out the supply chain enterprise interview investigation, sample data to obtain accurate, intellectual capital is goal oriented, re-examine the mechanism of knowledge sharing between supply chain enterprises. Put forward hypothesis on the relationship between knowledge sharing and intellectual capital, construct the theoretical model and the variable dimensions and items through the reliability test, pre analysis of scale development, improve the questionnaire; questionnaire survey to the domestic logistics equipment industry supply chain enterprises as the object, to obtain a more comprehensive and complete data, through exploratory factor analysis, to determine the validity of the model variables of confirmatory factor analysis, were the main effect, and the mediating effect analysis the regulatory effect of the structural equation model to test variable path in the theoretical model, the knowledge sharing between supply chain enterprises the main effect of Yu Zhi capital Should the mediating effect and moderating effect mechanism; research in static mechanism. On the basis of building a supply chain of main body of knowledge sharing, sharing willingness and co evolution system of intellectual capital, self organization characteristics and evolution mechanism analysis system, explains the system satisfied by the synergy theory analysis of the evolution of the rules and characteristics of the condition, then by using the complex the system theory of the classic "B-Z" response analysis model, build the evolution equations of the system, and using the Matlab simulation software, the sharing subject from different assumptions, evolution and willingness to share intellectual capital trajectory, through comprehensive analysis, the supply chain knowledge sharing among enterprises in intellectual capital co evolution dynamic mechanism. In this paper, the theory of rational behavior, social influence theory and self organization theory of synergetics organically, re combing knowledge sharing among the supply chain enterprises and influencing factors The logical relationship of intellectual capital, and knowledge sharing subject, sharing synergy between intention and intellectual capital; through a combination of qualitative and quantitative research, static mechanism and dynamic mechanism of the combination, to further tap the intrinsic mechanism of promoting sharing effect, refines the main mechanism of intellectual capital to enhance the innovation, the main achievements are as follows: (1) the knowledge sharing is combined with the two research fields of intellectual capital, build a model of knowledge sharing between supply chain enterprises in intellectual capital, and structural equation of supply chain knowledge sharing effect on intellectual capital model. (2) constructed the main supply chain knowledge sharing, sharing willingness and self organization coordination model of intellectual capital. Through the simulation of evolution equation, the dynamic mechanism of supply chain knowledge sharing in intellectual capital. (3) the classic "B-Z" model is extended to three-dimensional analysis of supply chain knowledge The sharing of research field, to explore the knowledge sharing among enterprises in supply chain mechanism of intellectual capital to provide a new way of thinking. The research process and conclusions, to further clarify the impact of intellectual capital and the mechanism of knowledge sharing among enterprises in supply chain, to expand the knowledge management method of supply chain management, rich connotation, has the positive the academic and practical significance.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：昆明理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F272

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李茹蘭;智力資本的投資與價(jià)值實(shí)現(xiàn)[J];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2000年01期

2 郭群;試論智力資本審計(jì)[J];廣東審計(jì);2000年10期

3 鄭日金;經(jīng)營(yíng)你的“智力資本”[J];車間管理;2000年03期

4 譚勁松,王朝曦,譚燕;試論智力資本會(huì)計(jì)[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2001年10期

5 王瑾瑜;智力資本的評(píng)估[J];科研管理;2001年05期

6 �！·戈伊洛,莫皆;論智力資本[J];國(guó)外財(cái)經(jīng);2001年01期

7 張敏;智力資本會(huì)計(jì)初探[J];浙江財(cái)稅與會(huì)計(jì);2001年08期

8 潘安成;基于智力資本的企業(yè)核心能力理論研究[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2002年06期

9 王勇,許慶瑞;智力資本及其測(cè)度研究[J];研究與發(fā)展管理;2002年02期

10 劉茂才;關(guān)于智力資本的市場(chǎng)化運(yùn)作的幾個(gè)問題[J];中華文化論壇;2002年01期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 董必榮;;智力資本會(huì)計(jì)的困境與展望[A];中國(guó)會(huì)計(jì)學(xué)會(huì)高等工科院校分會(huì)2009年學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議（第十六屆學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)）論文集[C];2009年

2 胡爽;;基于傳統(tǒng)制造業(yè)的智力資本對(duì)企業(yè)價(jià)值影響的研究[A];中國(guó)會(huì)計(jì)學(xué)會(huì)高等工科院校分會(huì)2010年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2010年

3 肖華芳;萬文軍;;智力資本披露研究[A];中國(guó)會(huì)計(jì)學(xué)會(huì)高等工科院校分會(huì)2008年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)（第十五屆年會(huì)）暨中央在鄂集團(tuán)企業(yè)財(cái)務(wù)管理研討會(huì)論文集（上冊(cè)）[C];2008年

4 李經(jīng)路;;智力資本測(cè)度問題探索[A];中國(guó)會(huì)計(jì)學(xué)會(huì)環(huán)境會(huì)計(jì)專業(yè)委員會(huì)2011學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2011年

5 章麗君;陳建明;;企業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)與智力資本的管理[A];面向復(fù)雜系統(tǒng)的管理理論與信息系統(tǒng)技術(shù)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議專輯[C];2000年

6 邱國(guó)棟;朱宇;;運(yùn)用人工神經(jīng)網(wǎng)絡(luò)測(cè)量智力資本[A];2001年中國(guó)管理科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集[C];2001年

7 王雪榮;闕中園;許婷;王斌;;智力資本與企業(yè)績(jī)效關(guān)系:基于中國(guó)三類行業(yè)的實(shí)證研究[A];第十二屆中國(guó)管理科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2010年

8 蘇方國(guó);甘英英;梁小燕;;城市智力資本指數(shù)模型[A];第六屆（2011）中國(guó)管理學(xué)年會(huì)——城市與區(qū)域管理分會(huì)場(chǎng)論文集[C];2011年

9 李經(jīng)路;;智力資本價(jià)值貢獻(xiàn)問題研究動(dòng)態(tài)[A];第三屆海峽兩岸會(huì)計(jì)學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2011年

10 劉英男;杜淼;;智力資本與企業(yè)價(jià)值相關(guān)性研究[A];中國(guó)會(huì)計(jì)學(xué)會(huì)高等工科院校分會(huì)2009年學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議（第十六屆學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)）論文集[C];2009年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 徐翔;有效管理智力資本提升企業(yè)核心競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力[N];經(jīng)理日?qǐng)?bào);2004年

2 齊一蕊;建立智力資本會(huì)計(jì)的新思維[N];財(cái)會(huì)信報(bào);2008年

3 記者 馬可佳;中外智力資本反差嚴(yán)重 誰低估了無形資產(chǎn)？[N];第一財(cái)經(jīng)日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

4 北京交通大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)管理學(xué)院 黨小博;以智力資本建設(shè)推動(dòng)改革進(jìn)程[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

5 鄒鳳嶺;培育企業(yè)“核心智力資本”[N];國(guó)際商報(bào);2000年

6 趙宏中;對(duì)智力資本的新認(rèn)識(shí)[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2004年

7 記者 陳丹鳳;智力資本化勢(shì)在必行[N];組織人事報(bào);2003年

8 陳光第;智力資本：企業(yè)不竭的核心競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力[N];中國(guó)信息報(bào);2008年

9 峰嶺;培育“核心智力資本”[N];市場(chǎng)報(bào);2000年

10 記者 賈學(xué)穎;我國(guó)上市公司過于依賴有形資產(chǎn)[N];中國(guó)財(cái)經(jīng)報(bào);2010年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 呂爽;智力資本對(duì)企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績(jī)效的作用機(jī)制研究[D];天津大學(xué);2015年

2 金桂根;供應(yīng)鏈企業(yè)間知識(shí)共享對(duì)智力資本的作用機(jī)制研究[D];昆明理工大學(xué);2017年

3 黃豪臣;智力資本價(jià)值動(dòng)因之研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2008年

4 戴乾文;智力資本與企業(yè)核心競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力及經(jīng)營(yíng)績(jī)效之關(guān)聯(lián)性研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2009年

5 劉超;智力資本對(duì)企業(yè)成長(zhǎng)影響機(jī)制研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2010年

6 李冬偉;智力資本與企業(yè)價(jià)值關(guān)系研究[D];大連理工大學(xué);2010年

7 趙振寬;戰(zhàn)略視角的公司智力資本開發(fā)研究[D];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2010年

8 景莉;智力資本與公司價(jià)值[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2004年

9 饒淑華;智力資本驅(qū)動(dòng)因素及其信息披露研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2005年

10 馬寧;風(fēng)險(xiǎn)資本協(xié)同智力資本的企業(yè)價(jià)值增值研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2015年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 蓋娜;基于智力資本的企業(yè)價(jià)值評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];中國(guó)海洋大學(xué);2008年

2 王振霞;智力資本會(huì)計(jì)研究[D];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2008年

3 張菡;企業(yè)績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)體系中的智力資本評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2007年

4 徐玲芳;高校智力資本的識(shí)別、測(cè)量和報(bào)告[D];江蘇大學(xué);2006年

5 張韻;智力資本報(bào)告在我國(guó)應(yīng)用的可行性研究[D];東華大學(xué);2007年

6 丁嵐;智力資本的激勵(lì)與風(fēng)險(xiǎn)防范[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2011年

7 劉燁;基于企業(yè)價(jià)值的智力資本評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系研究[D];河北大學(xué);2015年

8 王平;創(chuàng)業(yè)板上市公司智力資本對(duì)企業(yè)績(jī)效的影響研究[D];燕山大學(xué);2015年

9 楊靜;智力資本投資的價(jià)值創(chuàng)造路徑研究[D];蘭州財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2015年

10 吳雅云;企業(yè)生命周期、智力資本與企業(yè)成長(zhǎng)能力關(guān)系研究[D];中國(guó)地質(zhì)大學(xué)(北京);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：1409120