發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-05-12 11:22

【摘要】：露天礦區(qū)排土場的植被恢復(fù)是在土壤基質(zhì)改良的基礎(chǔ)上對適生植物進(jìn)行選取,達(dá)到有效改善土壤,增強(qiáng)邊坡穩(wěn)定性,使得排土場適宜植被快速恢復(fù),為改善周邊生態(tài)環(huán)境提供理論和技術(shù)支持。本文以準(zhǔn)東紅沙泉露天礦排土場為研究對象,對排土場和周邊土壤的土壤理化性質(zhì)以及土壤三大微生物的數(shù)量進(jìn)行實(shí)驗(yàn)室分析,研究其分布特征;系統(tǒng)評價(jià)排土場和周邊土壤質(zhì)量現(xiàn)狀;在利用排土場土壤質(zhì)量評價(jià)結(jié)果的基礎(chǔ)上,采用正交試驗(yàn)進(jìn)行土壤改良,篩選出土壤改良基質(zhì)優(yōu)方案及適宜排土場生長耐旱性強(qiáng)的植物。主要得到以下結(jié)論:1.露天礦排土場和周邊土壤特征分析:排土場土壤屬于堿性土,植物難以生存;土壤容重大,含水量相對少,導(dǎo)致土壤容易板結(jié);土壤養(yǎng)分含量低,達(dá)到極缺的水平,周邊土壤相對排土場總體較好;露天礦排土場的土壤微生物在種類和數(shù)量上存在差異,土壤三大微生物的數(shù)量在排土場和周邊土壤的總體分布特征為:細(xì)菌放線菌真菌。2.土壤質(zhì)量評價(jià)結(jié)果表明:根據(jù)加權(quán)和法指數(shù)評價(jià)模型算出的排土場的SQI值是0.339,周邊土壤SQI值是0.484,由此可知,排土場的土壤屬于較低水平,周邊的土壤屬于中等水平。3.土壤改良基質(zhì)優(yōu)方案的選擇:正交試驗(yàn)結(jié)果采用極差和方差分析,地上干重的優(yōu)方案為A3B4C4D1,地上鮮重的優(yōu)方案A3B4C4D4,地下鮮重的優(yōu)方案為A2B1C4D1,出苗率優(yōu)方案為A3B2C3D2,株高優(yōu)方案為A4B2C3D4。利用綜合平衡法得到試驗(yàn)優(yōu)方案為A4B2C4D4,即A(保水劑)20g,B(羊糞)1.5g,C(秸稈)140g,D(腐植酸)60g。4.抗旱性植物的篩選結(jié)果:在持續(xù)干旱脅迫和復(fù)水處理,7種植物的脯氨酸表現(xiàn)出的下降趨勢;丙二醛表現(xiàn)出上升的趨勢;葉綠素?zé)晒鈪?shù)F0上升、Fv、Fv/Fm和Fv/F0下降,幅度和速度均隨脅迫強(qiáng)度的增加而加快;指標(biāo)的變化因品種的抗旱性差異而不同。通過隸屬函數(shù)法得出7種植物的綜合抗旱能力強(qiáng)弱為:梭梭冷蒿檸條沙拐棗沙冬青四翅濱藜白沙蒿。
[Abstract]:The vegetation restoration of dump in opencast mining area is to select suitable plants on the basis of soil matrix improvement, so as to improve the soil effectively, enhance the stability of slope, and make the suitable vegetation of dump site recover rapidly. To provide theoretical and technical support for improving the surrounding ecological environment. In this paper, the soil physical and chemical properties of the dump and the surrounding soil and the number of three microorganisms in the soil were analyzed in laboratory, and the distribution characteristics of the dump site and the surrounding soil were studied by taking the drainage site of quasi-East Hongshaquan Open Pit Mine as the research object. The present situation of soil quality in and around the dump was systematically evaluated, and on the basis of the evaluation results of soil quality in the dump, the orthogonal test was used to improve the soil, and the optimal scheme of soil improvement matrix and the plants with strong drought tolerance were selected. The main conclusions are as follows: 1. Analysis of soil characteristics of open pit mine dump and its surrounding soil: the soil belongs to alkaline soil and it is difficult for plants to survive, the soil capacity is large and the water content is relatively small, which leads to the easy consolidation of soil. The soil nutrient content is low, reaching the extremely deficient level, the surrounding soil relative to the dump field is better as a whole; There are differences in species and quantity of soil microorganisms in open pit dump. The overall distribution characteristics of the three microorganisms in the dump and the surrounding soil are as follows: bacterial actinomycetes fungi. 2. The results of soil quality evaluation show that the SQI value of the dump calculated according to the weighted sum index evaluation model is 0.339, and the SQI value of the surrounding soil is 0.484. it can be seen that the soil of the dump belongs to the lower level. The surrounding soil is of medium level. 3. Selection of optimal scheme for soil improvement matrix: the results of orthogonal test were as follows: the optimal scheme of dry weight on ground was A3B4C4D1, the optimal scheme of fresh weight on ground was A3B4C4D4, the optimal scheme of underground fresh weight was A2B1C4D1, and the optimal scheme of emergence rate was A3B2C3D2. The optimal scheme of plant height was A4B2C3D4. The optimum scheme was A4B2C4D4, that is, A (water retaining agent) 20g, B (sheep dung) 1.5g, C (straw) 140g, D (humic acid) 60g 路4, the optimum scheme was A4B2C4D4, B (sheep manure) 1.5g, C (straw) 140g, D (humic acid) 60g. 4. The screening results of drought-resistant plants showed that proline decreased, malondialdehyde (MDA) showed an upward trend under continuous drought stress and rehydration treatment. The chlorophyll fluorescence parameters F0 increased, Fv,Fv/Fm and Fv/F0 decreased, and the amplitude and speed increased with the increase of stress intensity, and the changes of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters varied with the difference of drought resistance of varieties. Through the method of membership function, the comprehensive drought resistance of seven species of plants was obtained as follows: Artemisia ammodendron, Caragana korshinskii, Euphorbia pulcherrima, Tripterygium aestivum, Artemisia artemisia.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：新疆大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：Q948

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙吉;康振中;韓勤勤;楊志杰;李靜泉;許繼飛;;粉煤灰在土壤改良及修復(fù)中的應(yīng)用與展望[J];江蘇農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2017年02期

2 張?jiān)娨?楊建軍;莫愛;;干旱脅迫下七種牧草葉綠素?zé)晒鈪?shù)與抗旱性關(guān)系研究[J];湖北農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2017年01期

3 李春燕;王進(jìn)鑫;王敏;陳科皓;王榆鑫;宋清玉;;鉛脅迫下干旱對國槐和紫穗槐幼苗抗氧化酶活性的影響[J];干旱地區(qū)農(nóng)業(yè)研究;2016年03期

4 谷裕;王金滿;劉慧娟;王洪丹;白中科;;干旱半干旱煤礦區(qū)土壤含水率研究進(jìn)展[J];灌溉排水學(xué)報(bào);2016年04期

5 方瑛;馬任甜;安韶山;趙俊峰;肖禮;;黑岱溝露天煤礦排土場不同植被復(fù)墾土壤酶活性及理化性質(zhì)研究[J];環(huán)境科學(xué);2016年03期

6 祝宇成;王金滿;白中科;秦倩;王洪丹;;采煤塌陷對土壤理化性質(zhì)影響的研究進(jìn)展[J];土壤;2016年01期

7 彭東海;侯曉龍;何宗明;劉露奇;蔡麗平;林靜雯;江瑞榮;黃福才;鐘均華;;金尾礦廢棄地不同植被恢復(fù)模式對土壤理化性質(zhì)的影響[J];水土保持學(xué)報(bào);2015年06期

8 楊建軍;張園園;周耀治;呂光輝;劉巍;;新疆準(zhǔn)東露天煤礦生態(tài)安全評價(jià)研究[J];中國礦業(yè);2015年10期

9 胡宜剛;張鵬;趙洋;黃磊;虎瑞;;植被配置對黑岱溝露天煤礦區(qū)土壤養(yǎng)分恢復(fù)的影響[J];草業(yè)科學(xué);2015年10期

10 李鵬飛;張興昌;朱首軍;甄慶;張鵬輝;;植被恢復(fù)對黑岱溝礦區(qū)排土場土壤性質(zhì)的影響[J];水土保持通報(bào);2015年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 楊勇;錫林郭勒露天煤礦區(qū)土壤重金屬分布特征與植被恢復(fù)研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2016年

2 范廷玉;潘謝采煤沉陷區(qū)地表水與淺層地下水轉(zhuǎn)化及水質(zhì)特征研究[D];安徽理工大學(xué);2013年

3 牛星;伊敏露天煤礦廢棄地植被恢復(fù)及其效果研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2013年

4 張涪平;藏中拉屋銅礦區(qū)生態(tài)恢復(fù)研究[D];華中農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2012年

5 董書寧;干旱、半干旱復(fù)雜礦區(qū)水資源系統(tǒng)優(yōu)化配置及綜合利用[D];長安大學(xué);2011年

6 王煜琴;城郊山區(qū)型煤礦廢棄地生態(tài)修復(fù)模式與技術(shù)[D];中國礦業(yè)大學(xué)（北京）;2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 高侃;吉林通化赤柏松銅鎳礦開采對水環(huán)境及生態(tài)環(huán)境的影響[D];吉林大學(xué);2016年

2 余莉琳;干旱礦區(qū)生態(tài)修復(fù)土壤改良及植物選擇實(shí)驗(yàn)[D];中國礦業(yè)大學(xué);2014年

3 梁希;錳礦尾礦庫耐性植物的篩選及其耐性機(jī)理初步研究[D];中南林業(yè)科技大學(xué);2014年

4 李鵬飛;植被恢復(fù)對黑岱溝煤礦排土場土壤性質(zhì)和質(zhì)量的影響研究[D];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué);2014年

5 張藝偉;山西工礦區(qū)耐性植物—土壤系統(tǒng)對干旱脅迫的響應(yīng)研究[D];山西大學(xué);2013年

6 溫久川;礦區(qū)生態(tài)環(huán)境問題及生態(tài)恢復(fù)研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2012年

7 冀偉珍;渭北煤礦區(qū)開采沉陷對土地資源的破壞及防治對策[D];西安科技大學(xué);2010年

8 皇甫艷麗;礦區(qū)景觀生態(tài)重建的研究[D];河北農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2010年

9 夢莉;廢棄礦區(qū)植被恢復(fù)對物種多樣性及土壤性狀影響[D];南京林業(yè)大學(xué);2010年

10 張濤;干旱礦區(qū)廢棄地土壤種子庫特征研究[D];甘肅農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：2475352