本文選題：儒家 + 基督教�。� 參考：《延邊大學》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】：以儒家為代表的中國文化與以基督教為代表的西方文化是兩種本質截然不同的文化體系。前者是建立在哲學觀念和人生理想基礎之上的文化,后者則是一種典型的宗教信仰文化。因為它們二者在自己的文化體系中同是根本所在,所以它們在各自文化體系的建構上都起到了至關重要的作用,因此,將它們二者進行對比分析對于我們加深對東西方文化的了解和交流具有一定的積極意義。可是,對儒家與基督教進行宏觀的對比,非筆者能力所及。為此,筆者選定了“愛”這個微觀視角。愛在儒家和基督教兩大傳統(tǒng)中都占有核心位置,然而,它們具有的品質和內涵卻是十分不同的。儒家的愛被稱為“仁愛”,基督教的愛被稱為“博愛”,二者分別代表著儒家傳統(tǒng)和基督教傳統(tǒng)的根本原則,體現了兩種不同的文化精神和道德信念,因此,對儒家仁愛觀和基督教博愛觀進行對比分析是十分有必要的。 本文首先對“愛”在儒家與基督教中的地位進行了探討；其次,在儒家仁愛觀和基督教博愛觀的人性論前提層面上,筆者對儒家的性善論和基督教的原罪說做了論述并對二者導致的性善與性惡做了對比分析；再次,在儒家仁愛觀和基督教博愛觀的價值取向層面上,筆者對儒家的人本主義和基督教的神本主義做了論述并對二者導致的內圣外王與進天國做了對比分析；第四,在儒家仁愛觀和基督教博愛觀的超越方式層面上,筆者對儒家的修身之道和基督教的因信稱義做了論述并對二者導致的內在超越與外在超越做了對比分析；最后,筆者就儒家仁愛觀和基督教博愛觀的現代價值做了淺顯的探索。
[Abstract]:The Chinese culture represented by Confucianism and the western culture represented by Christianity are two distinct cultural systems. The former is a culture built on the basis of philosophy and life ideals, and the latter is a typical religious belief culture. Because the two of them are fundamental in their own cultural system. They have played a vital role in the construction of their respective cultural systems. Therefore, the comparative analysis of the two of them has certain positive significance for us to deepen the understanding and exchange of the culture of the East and the West. However, it is not the author's ability to make a macro comparison between Confucianism and Christianity. This microcosmic perspective holds the core position of love between the two traditions of Confucianism and Christianity. However, they have different qualities and connotations. The love of Confucianism is called "benevolence", and the love of Christianity is called "love". The two represents the fundamental principles of the Confucian tradition and the Christian tradition, reflecting two different kinds of differences. Therefore, it is necessary to make a comparative analysis of Confucian benevolence and Christian view of fraternity.
This article first discusses the status of "love" in Confucianism and Christianity. Secondly, on the premise of the Confucian benevolence view and the human nature of the Christian fraternity view, the author makes a discussion on the Confucian theory of sexual goodness and the original sin of Christianity, and makes a comparative analysis of the sexual good and sexual evil caused by the two, and again, in the Confucian benevolence and love. In the value orientation of the Christian view of love, the author makes a discussion on the Confucian humanism and the Christian theism and makes a comparative analysis of the inner saints and the kingdom of heaven caused by the two. Fourth, on the level of transcendence of Confucian benevolence and Christian philanthropy, the author of the Confucian doctrine of practice and the cause of Christianity The author makes a comparative analysis of the internal and external transcendence caused by the two parties. Finally, the author makes a simple exploration of the modern value of the Confucian benevolence view and the Christian view of love.
【學位授予單位】：延邊大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：B978

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 張路;解光云;;析論早期基督教“博愛”思想產生的背景[J];安徽廣播電視大學學報;2008年03期

2 謝玲玲;;論中國古代儒家人本思想的現代價值[J];安徽文學(下半月);2008年08期

3 張瑞;;先秦儒家人本思想對當代的啟示[J];長春師范學院學報;2007年05期

4 楊清榮;;儒家“內在超越”對當代中國人的意義[J];道德與文明;2006年06期

5 張慶熊;試析基督教和儒家的罪惡觀[J];復旦學報(社會科學版);2002年05期

6 朱寰;儒學與基督教道德哲學核心理念的異同[J];甘肅社會科學;2003年05期

7 王南方;儒家修身方法論及其現實價值[J];管子學刊;2000年01期

8 雷雨田;基督教與儒學之異同和共處之道[J];廣州社會主義學院學報;2005年03期

9 朱全紅,張?zhí)O英;儒家"仁愛"倫理與基督教"博愛"倫理思想比較研究[J];吉首大學學報(社會科學版);2002年04期

10 徐福來;林輝;李雪;;從孔子的“仁與天道”看儒家的“內在超越”精神[J];江西社會科學;2007年09期

，

本文編號：2094161