本文選題：石橋湛山　切入點(diǎn)：小日本主義　出處：《華東師范大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：日本的近代史從某種程度上可以說是建立“大日本帝國”的歷史。而與此擴(kuò)張過程相對(duì)的是,《東洋經(jīng)濟(jì)新報(bào)》的記者石橋湛山在大正年間(1912-1926年)主張的“小日本主義”。他主張殖民地于國民經(jīng)濟(jì)無用,日本應(yīng)該拋棄一切海外殖民地,縮減軍備,支持弱小民族的民族自治運(yùn)動(dòng)。此外,他還對(duì)當(dāng)時(shí)中國的民族主義運(yùn)動(dòng)抱有很大的同情,主張日本不應(yīng)該干涉中國事務(wù),支持中國領(lǐng)土的完整以及中國的統(tǒng)一和發(fā)展。但是,后世往往將石橋早期提出的“小日本主義”標(biāo)簽化,實(shí)際上石橋湛山作為記者的言論生涯中有大段時(shí)間是在戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)期間度過。在戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)期間他的立場(chǎng)發(fā)生了一定的動(dòng)搖,雖然他并未積極主動(dòng)支持日本的侵略戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng),但是在戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)期間他還是從原有的“小日本主義”立場(chǎng)有所退縮。首先,他開始支持日本對(duì)于中國內(nèi)部事務(wù)的干涉,并開始指責(zé)中國政府民族主義的對(duì)外政策,并對(duì)日本傀儡國“滿洲國”表示了認(rèn)可。隨著戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)的深入,他更是改變了對(duì)殖民地經(jīng)濟(jì)無用的觀點(diǎn),開始一定程度上積極評(píng)價(jià)殖民地的經(jīng)濟(jì)價(jià)值。此外對(duì)于軍事的作用也他漸漸轉(zhuǎn)向積極評(píng)價(jià),對(duì)于亞洲弱小民族自治的主張也漸漸消失不見。因此可以說在戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)期間石橋湛山的“小日本主義”主張發(fā)生了一定的思想轉(zhuǎn)向,這是我們?cè)诎阉ㄎ怀伞靶∪毡局髁x者”時(shí)不能忽視的。
[Abstract]:The modern history of Japan can be said to be the history of the establishment of the "Great Japanese Empire" to some extent. In contrast to this process of expansion, Shikihiro Zhanshan, a reporter of the New Oriental Economic News, advocated "Little Japan" during the period of Taisho. He argued that the colonies were useless to the national economy. Japan should abandon all overseas colonies, reduce its armaments, and support the national autonomy movement of the small and weak nations. In addition, he also had great sympathy for the nationalist movement in China at that time, arguing that Japan should not interfere in China's affairs. Support for the territorial integrity of China and the reunification and development of China. However, later generations often labelled the "Little Japanism" proposed by Ishiqiao in the early days. In fact, Ishiqiao Zhanshan spent a long time in his speech as a journalist during the war. During the war, his position wavered, although he did not actively support Japan's aggressive war. But during the war, he backed down from his original "little Japanist" stance. First, he began to support Japan's interference in China's internal affairs and began to blame the Chinese government for its nationalist foreign policy. And expressed his recognition of the Japanese puppet state "Manchukuo". With the deepening of the war, he even changed his view on the uselessness of the colonial economy. To some extent, he began to positively evaluate the economic value of the colonies. In addition, he gradually turned to a positive assessment of the role of the military. The idea of "small Japanism" in Shiqiao Zhanshan during the war has gradually disappeared, so it can be said that a certain ideological turn has taken place in Shiqiao Zhanshan's "Little Japanism". This is something we cannot ignore when we position him as a "little Japanist."
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：D093.13

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 易顯石;;石橋湛山與反戰(zhàn)文化[J];日本研究;1992年04期

2 劉映春;戰(zhàn)后日本內(nèi)閣首相簡(jiǎn)介之七——石橋湛山[J];日本問題;1986年03期

3 ;中華人民共和國國務(wù)院總理周恩來和日本前任首相石橋湛山會(huì)談公報(bào)[J];中華人民共和國國務(wù)院公報(bào);1959年22期

4 朱理峰;田富;;論石橋湛山的反戰(zhàn)和平思想[J];綏化學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年06期

5 安成日;;試論第四次日韓正式會(huì)談前的預(yù)備交涉[J];歷史教學(xué)(高校版);2008年11期

6 苑崇利;;冷戰(zhàn)時(shí)期的“脫冷戰(zhàn)”思考——石橋湛山國際政治思想述評(píng)[J];外交評(píng)論(外交學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2009年02期

7 安成日;;石橋湛山與當(dāng)代中日關(guān)系[J];現(xiàn)代日本經(jīng)濟(jì);1991年05期

8 陳毅立;;近代日本的和平反戰(zhàn)思想——以宮崎滔天與石橋湛山的比較為中心[J];日本問題研究;2014年03期

9 苑崇利;;對(duì)石橋湛山“功利”外交思想的考察[J];日本學(xué)刊;2008年04期

10 孫平化;;中日友好枿想錄[J];世界知識(shí);1985年18期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 苑崇利;;石橋湛山東北亞和平構(gòu)想的研究[A];中日關(guān)系史研究·2014年第1期（總第114期）[C];2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 尤一唯;石橋湛山的“小日本主義”研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2016年

2 佟艷;石橋湛山與吉野作造的中國觀比較[D];東北師范大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1699747