本文選題：政治盟約 + 盟主體制　； 參考：《北京師范大學(xué)》2008年博士論文

【摘要】： 中國(guó)古代的政治盟約,在春秋時(shí)代進(jìn)入其典型形態(tài),到戰(zhàn)國(guó)以降,產(chǎn)生了巨大的轉(zhuǎn)變,隨即又在漢帝國(guó)的產(chǎn)生過程中扮演重要角色。政治盟約在帝國(guó)體制下被改造,而在帝國(guó)崩潰時(shí)期,表現(xiàn)出更新的面貌。 在春秋時(shí)代,政治盟約承擔(dān)著維系諸侯國(guó)家共同體的功能。通過政治盟約,若干政治原理從諸侯國(guó)家的具體關(guān)系中被提煉出來,成為了盟主體制的基本原則。從春秋諸侯國(guó)家之間的自由盟誓到盟主體系確立的過程,也是政治盟約所反映的原理從具體向抽象過渡并且形成一個(gè)穩(wěn)固體系的過程。 在戰(zhàn)國(guó)時(shí)期,春秋類型的諸侯國(guó)家關(guān)系不復(fù)存在,而政治盟約在此時(shí)重新又有了具體化和私人化的關(guān)系。所謂具體化,與盟主體系下的政治原理由具體而趨于抽象的過程相對(duì);所謂私人化,則是指政治盟約的信用承載者已漸漸變?yōu)榉饩齻�(gè)人甚至游士。在國(guó)與國(guó)之間的盟約信譽(yù)下降時(shí),此類私人交際之中重信義、盟約的因素得到激發(fā)。 在反秦戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)中,基于任俠和盟約精神的雙重基礎(chǔ),大量的地域集團(tuán)得以產(chǎn)生、聯(lián)合,并對(duì)反秦戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)與楚漢戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)的進(jìn)程產(chǎn)生了重大影響。漢帝國(guó)建立后,以“白馬之盟”將延續(xù)自反秦與楚漢戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)的具體君臣關(guān)系轉(zhuǎn)化為基于抽象原則的新君臣關(guān)系。在漢——諸侯王國(guó)、漢——周邊政權(quán)的問題上,政治盟約也被廣泛利用。 新莽末和東漢末的動(dòng)亂中,政治盟約再次顯著地出現(xiàn),然而其主張的原則,已經(jīng)深深地帶有帝國(guó)體制的影子。
[Abstract]:The political covenant in ancient China entered its typical form in the Spring and Autumn period, and brought great changes to the warring States period, and then played an important role in the process of the formation of the Han Empire. The political covenant was reformed under the imperial system and renewed during the collapse of the empire. In the Spring and Autumn period, the political covenant assumed the function of maintaining the feudal state community. Through the political covenant, a number of political principles were abstracted from the specific relations of the feudal states and became the basic principles of the leadership system. The process from the vows of freedom between the vassal states of the Spring and Autumn period to the establishment of the system of leaders is also a process in which the principles reflected in the political covenants are transitioned from concrete to abstract and a firm system is formed. During the warring States period, the relationship between princes and princes of the Spring and Autumn period ceased to exist, and the political covenant had the relationship of concretization and personalization again. The so-called concretization is opposite to the concrete and abstract process of the political principle under the system of the leader of the alliance; the so-called personalization means that the bearer of the credit of the political covenant has gradually become a monarch or even a tourist. When the credibility of state-to-state covenants declines, such private communication emphasizes faithfulness and inspires the elements of the covenants. In the anti-Qin war, based on the dual foundation of Ren Xia and the spirit of the covenant, a large number of regional groups were formed, United, and had a great influence on the process of the anti-Qin war and the Chu and Han war. After the establishment of the Han Empire, the "League of White Horse" will continue the specific monarch and subject relations from the anti-Qin and the Chu and Han wars to the new monarchical relations based on abstract principles. Political covenants have also been widely used in the Han-feudal kingdoms, the Han-surrounding regimes. In the turmoil of the late New Mang and the end of the Eastern Han Dynasty, the political covenant appeared again, but the principles it advocated had a deep shadow of the imperial system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號(hào)】：K207

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 周曉偉;《左傳》外交文化研究[D];江南大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：2073642