民國（1927-1949）青海蒙藏牧區(qū)縣政研究
發(fā)布時間：2019-04-04 11:05
【摘要】：民國時期是中國由傳統(tǒng)社會向近現(xiàn)代社會過渡的關(guān)鍵時期，青海蒙藏牧區(qū)在此背景下開始了近代化的進程。青海蒙藏牧區(qū)設(shè)機構(gòu)管理最早可追溯到漢代，清代打破了前代的羈縻政策，在蒙藏牧區(qū)推行盟旗制度和千百戶制度，也保留著一定的政教合一制度。在這樣制度下，地方社會實際上仍被土著上層控制，國家力量并不能有效延伸到地方基層社會中。民國時期為了改變這一局面，國民政府在蒙藏牧區(qū)設(shè)立了縣、設(shè)治局、行政督察區(qū)等，并且設(shè)立了一批下屬機構(gòu)和配套機構(gòu)，以期實現(xiàn)國家權(quán)力在蒙藏牧區(qū)的進一步深入和細化。國家也采取一系列措施保證縣政有效推行。這些政策取得了一定的效果。 但因民國時期戰(zhàn)亂頻繁的環(huán)境，青海落后的客觀現(xiàn)實和國民政府的政策失誤等，青海蒙藏牧區(qū)縣政難以推行。幾百年形成的強大的社會力量及民眾對部落根深蒂固的認同對國家力量形成了強大反彈，極力阻止國家力量深入地方，而且國家也需要依靠社會力量管理地方社會。整個民國時期，青海蒙藏牧區(qū)的縣等代表國家力量的基層機構(gòu)無法對地方社會有效地管理和服務(wù)，大部分權(quán)力還在原有的社會管理者——頭人和喇嘛手中。有時縣政府推行政令甚至需要借助軍隊或其他暴力，，即使這樣也無法長期且有效地解決問題。國民政府在縣政推行方面錯失了機會，造成了許多歷史遺留問題。
[Abstract]:The period of the Republic of China was the key period of China's transition from traditional society to modern society. Under this background, the Mongolian and Tibetan pastoral areas in Qinghai Province began the process of modernization. The management of Mongolian and Tibetan pastoral areas in Qinghai Province can be traced back to the Han Dynasty. The Qing Dynasty broke the policy of Jimi of the previous generation and carried out the alliance flag system and the thousands of families system in the Mongolian and Tibetan pastoral areas, and also retained a certain system of unity of politics and religion. Under such a system, the local society is still controlled by the indigenous upper class, and the national power can not be effectively extended to the local grass-roots society. In order to change this situation during the period of the Republic of China, the national government set up counties, administrative bureaus, administrative inspection areas and so on in the pastoral areas of Mongolia and Tibet, and set up a number of subordinate bodies and supporting institutions. In order to realize the state power in the Mongolian and Tibetan pastoral areas of further deepening and refinement. The state has also adopted a series of measures to ensure the effective implementation of county government. These policies have had some effect. However, due to the frequent war in the Republic of China, the backward reality of Qinghai and the policy mistakes of the national government, it is difficult to carry out the county administration in the Mongolian, Tibetan and pastoral areas of Qinghai Province. The strong social forces formed over the centuries and the deep-rooted identity of the people to the tribes have strongly rebelled against the national forces, trying to prevent them from reaching the local level, and the state also needs to rely on the social forces to manage the local society. Throughout the period of the Republic of China, grass-roots organizations representing the national forces, such as counties in Mongolian-Tibetan pastoral areas of Qinghai Province, were unable to effectively manage and serve the local society, and most of the power was still in the hands of the original social managers, the head and the Lama. Sometimes county governments need to resort to military or other violence, even if they do not solve the problem in a long-term and effective way. The national government missed the opportunity to carry out county administration and caused many problems left over by history.
【學位授予單位】：青海師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D693;K258
本文編號：2453746
[Abstract]:The period of the Republic of China was the key period of China's transition from traditional society to modern society. Under this background, the Mongolian and Tibetan pastoral areas in Qinghai Province began the process of modernization. The management of Mongolian and Tibetan pastoral areas in Qinghai Province can be traced back to the Han Dynasty. The Qing Dynasty broke the policy of Jimi of the previous generation and carried out the alliance flag system and the thousands of families system in the Mongolian and Tibetan pastoral areas, and also retained a certain system of unity of politics and religion. Under such a system, the local society is still controlled by the indigenous upper class, and the national power can not be effectively extended to the local grass-roots society. In order to change this situation during the period of the Republic of China, the national government set up counties, administrative bureaus, administrative inspection areas and so on in the pastoral areas of Mongolia and Tibet, and set up a number of subordinate bodies and supporting institutions. In order to realize the state power in the Mongolian and Tibetan pastoral areas of further deepening and refinement. The state has also adopted a series of measures to ensure the effective implementation of county government. These policies have had some effect. However, due to the frequent war in the Republic of China, the backward reality of Qinghai and the policy mistakes of the national government, it is difficult to carry out the county administration in the Mongolian, Tibetan and pastoral areas of Qinghai Province. The strong social forces formed over the centuries and the deep-rooted identity of the people to the tribes have strongly rebelled against the national forces, trying to prevent them from reaching the local level, and the state also needs to rely on the social forces to manage the local society. Throughout the period of the Republic of China, grass-roots organizations representing the national forces, such as counties in Mongolian-Tibetan pastoral areas of Qinghai Province, were unable to effectively manage and serve the local society, and most of the power was still in the hands of the original social managers, the head and the Lama. Sometimes county governments need to resort to military or other violence, even if they do not solve the problem in a long-term and effective way. The national government missed the opportunity to carry out county administration and caused many problems left over by history.
【學位授予單位】：青海師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D693;K258
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 桑丁才仁;;民國玉樹縣建政史略及相關(guān)問題研究[J];中國藏學;2011年S2期
2 劉海燕;30年代國民政府推行縣政建設(shè)原因探析[J];民國檔案;2001年01期
3 苑豐;劉武芳;;20世紀中國縣政演變的邏輯[J];江蘇大學學報(社會科學版);2010年02期
4 白貴一;;論20世紀30年代南京國民政府縣政改革[J];江蘇大學學報(社會科學版);2010年06期
5 袁文偉;;近代三維社會變遷與軍閥政治的崛起[J];晉陽學刊;2008年06期
6 杜常順;;論清代青海東部地區(qū)的行政變革與地方民族社會[J];民族研究;2011年02期
7 霍維洮;;《近代西北民族社會變遷》前言[J];寧夏大學學報(人文社會科學版);2009年01期
8 陳新海;民國時期青海管理方略[J];青海民族研究;1997年03期
9 陳秀實;青海的蒙古旗考述[J];青海民族研究;2004年01期
10 徐蘊;試析旗制對青海蒙古社會發(fā)展的負面影響[J];青海民族研究;2005年01期
相關(guān)博士學位論文 前1條
1 杜黨軍;清代西寧辦事大臣研究[D];蘭州大學;2013年
本文編號：2453746
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zgjxds/2453746.html
