清代經解文獻系年考—咸同光宣時期
發(fā)布時間：2018-11-16 12:32
【摘要】：中國傳統(tǒng)學術發(fā)展到清代,進入整理和總結的重要時期。而作為官方哲學的經學也在此時發(fā)展到鼎盛,影響著清代以至近代社會的政治、教育、文化等各個方面。據粗略統(tǒng)計,有清一代,經學研究學者超過一千人,經學相關著作達萬余種之多,可謂卷帙浩繁、汗牛充棟。但在學術界,目前還缺少編年體的清代經學研究著作,尤其是系統(tǒng)的清代經學著作成書年代的考證還是一個空白。 本文以考證清代經學著作的成書年代為重點,立足于文獻學的基本研究方法,于浩如煙海的清代史籍和今人著述中,梳理出清代經解文獻成書年代的相關信息,按年系書事,依書編排,每一條目先系年月,次述成書情況,次引立論依據及文獻出處,最后介紹作者并作相關說明和考證。 本系列論文《清代經解文獻系年考》主要考證成書于有清一代(公元1644-1911年)的經學著作。依清帝年號分為四個階段、四個部分：順治康熙時期(1644-1722年),雍正乾隆時期(1723-1795年),嘉慶道光時期(1796-1850年),咸豐同治光緒宣統(tǒng)時期(1851-1911年)。本文是此系列論文的第四階段：咸豐同治光緒宣統(tǒng)時期(1851-1911年),分為緒論、凡例、正文和余論四部分。第一部分綜述此階段經學研究的現狀和研究的方法。第二部分簡述系年所依據的原則及標準：以年代為經,以著作為緯。第三部分從清代史籍和近人在此方面的著述中,梳理出有關咸同光宣時期經解文獻成書年代的相關信息,然后將之系在不同的年份下。第四部分在系年的基礎上對此階段經學發(fā)展概況和特點作出簡單概括,歸結出此階段經學在繼乾嘉昌盛局面之后表現出新的特點,同時也取得了令人矚目的成就。 總之,本文秉承文獻學“辨章學術、考鏡源流”的學術宗旨,對清代咸同光宣時期經解文獻的成書年代第一次進行了深入而系統(tǒng)的考證,并按照成書年代進行了排序；其次,傳統(tǒng)的學術史往往以最重要人物、著作、思想及學派為研究對象,缺乏對次要人物與著作的關注,本文第一次對此時期的經學家及其著作進行了清理和考證,基本勾勒出清代經解文獻的發(fā)展全貌。這也是本文的特色和創(chuàng)新之處。
[Abstract]:Chinese traditional academic development to the Qing Dynasty, into an important period of collation and summary. As an official philosophy, the Confucian classics also developed to the peak at this time, which influenced the politics, education, culture and other aspects of the Qing Dynasty and modern society. According to rough statistics, there were more than 1,000 scholars in the Qing Dynasty, and more than ten thousand related works of Confucian classics, which could be described as voluminous and abundant. However, in academic circles, there is still a lack of chronological studies of the Qing Dynasty, especially the systematic textual research of the Qing Dynasty. Based on the basic research methods of philology, and in the vast historical books of the Qing Dynasty and in the writings of present people, this paper, focusing on the textual research on the age of the books of the classics of the Qing Dynasty, sorts out the relevant information of the time when the documents of the classics of the Qing Dynasty were written, and then it is a matter of the book according to the year. According to the book arrangement, each entry is the first year and month, then describes the situation of the book, the basis of the secondary citation theory and the source of the literature, and finally introduces the author and makes relevant explanations and textual research. In this series of papers, the Department of Classical interpretation of the Qing Dynasty, the main textual research in the Qing Dynasty (AD 1644-1911) of the classics works. According to the title of Emperor Qing Dynasty, it is divided into four parts: Shunzhi Kangxi period (1644-1722), Yongzheng Qianlong period (1723-1795), Jiaqing Daoguang period (1796-1850), Xianfeng Tongzhi Guang Xu Xuanzhong period (1851-1911). This paper is the fourth stage of this series of papers: Xianfeng Tongzhi Guang Xu Xuantong period (1851-1911), divided into four parts: introduction, examples, the text and the rest. The first part summarizes the current situation and research methods of the study of Confucian classics in this stage. The second part briefly describes the principles and criteria on which the year is based: the year as the meridian and the book as the latitude. In the third part, from the historical books of Qing Dynasty and the works of modern people in this respect, the author sorts out the relevant information about the literature of Xiantong Guangxuan period, and then puts it in different years. The fourth part makes a brief summary of the development and characteristics of Confucian classics in this stage on the basis of the years, and concludes that the Confucian classics in this stage showed new characteristics after the prosperity of Qianjia and made remarkable achievements at the same time. In a word, this paper, in keeping with the academic purpose of philology, "the study of chapter differentiation, examination of the source of mirror", makes a deep and systematic textual research on the first time of the writing of the classics in the period of salt and light propaganda in the Qing Dynasty, and makes a ranking according to the time of the completion of the book. Secondly, the traditional academic history often takes the most important person, the work, the thought and the school as the research object, lacks to pay attention to the secondary figure and the work, this article has carried on the clean up and the textual research to this period economist and its work for the first time, Basic outline of the Qing Dynasty, the development of the literature. This is also the characteristics and innovation of this article.
【學位授予單位】：華中師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：B234;K252
本文編號：2335528
[Abstract]:Chinese traditional academic development to the Qing Dynasty, into an important period of collation and summary. As an official philosophy, the Confucian classics also developed to the peak at this time, which influenced the politics, education, culture and other aspects of the Qing Dynasty and modern society. According to rough statistics, there were more than 1,000 scholars in the Qing Dynasty, and more than ten thousand related works of Confucian classics, which could be described as voluminous and abundant. However, in academic circles, there is still a lack of chronological studies of the Qing Dynasty, especially the systematic textual research of the Qing Dynasty. Based on the basic research methods of philology, and in the vast historical books of the Qing Dynasty and in the writings of present people, this paper, focusing on the textual research on the age of the books of the classics of the Qing Dynasty, sorts out the relevant information of the time when the documents of the classics of the Qing Dynasty were written, and then it is a matter of the book according to the year. According to the book arrangement, each entry is the first year and month, then describes the situation of the book, the basis of the secondary citation theory and the source of the literature, and finally introduces the author and makes relevant explanations and textual research. In this series of papers, the Department of Classical interpretation of the Qing Dynasty, the main textual research in the Qing Dynasty (AD 1644-1911) of the classics works. According to the title of Emperor Qing Dynasty, it is divided into four parts: Shunzhi Kangxi period (1644-1722), Yongzheng Qianlong period (1723-1795), Jiaqing Daoguang period (1796-1850), Xianfeng Tongzhi Guang Xu Xuanzhong period (1851-1911). This paper is the fourth stage of this series of papers: Xianfeng Tongzhi Guang Xu Xuantong period (1851-1911), divided into four parts: introduction, examples, the text and the rest. The first part summarizes the current situation and research methods of the study of Confucian classics in this stage. The second part briefly describes the principles and criteria on which the year is based: the year as the meridian and the book as the latitude. In the third part, from the historical books of Qing Dynasty and the works of modern people in this respect, the author sorts out the relevant information about the literature of Xiantong Guangxuan period, and then puts it in different years. The fourth part makes a brief summary of the development and characteristics of Confucian classics in this stage on the basis of the years, and concludes that the Confucian classics in this stage showed new characteristics after the prosperity of Qianjia and made remarkable achievements at the same time. In a word, this paper, in keeping with the academic purpose of philology, "the study of chapter differentiation, examination of the source of mirror", makes a deep and systematic textual research on the first time of the writing of the classics in the period of salt and light propaganda in the Qing Dynasty, and makes a ranking according to the time of the completion of the book. Secondly, the traditional academic history often takes the most important person, the work, the thought and the school as the research object, lacks to pay attention to the secondary figure and the work, this article has carried on the clean up and the textual research to this period economist and its work for the first time, Basic outline of the Qing Dynasty, the development of the literature. This is also the characteristics and innovation of this article.
【學位授予單位】：華中師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：B234;K252
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 黃開國;廖平經學六變時間略考[J];成都大學學報(社會科學版);1987年01期
2 姜鈞;梁啟超與孔學[J];孔子研究;1986年02期
3 趙振鐸;;從《周禮正義》看孫詒讓對《集韻》的研究[J];四川大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2006年04期
4 朱淑君;戴望經學述論[J];首都師范大學學報(社會科學版);2004年S3期
5 魯錦寰;;科學與人文融會的傳統(tǒng)——讀楊小明《清代浙東學派與科學》[J];史學月刊;2006年02期
6 楊洪升;;繆荃孫著述新考[J];圖書館雜志;2008年05期
7 劉墨;;王國維的經學研究[J];徐州師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2007年05期
8 梅新林;俞樟華;;浙東學派編年史的學術創(chuàng)意與構想[J];浙江師范大學學報(社會科學版);2010年05期
9 陳國慶,曾謙;章炳麟傳統(tǒng)學術研究的成就[J];中州學刊;2003年02期
10 任劍濤;經典解讀中的原創(chuàng)思想負載——從《孟子字義疏證》與《孟子微》看[J];中國哲學史;2002年01期
相關博士學位論文 前10條
1 史振卿;清代《尚書》學若干問題研究[D];華中師范大學;2011年
2 朱華忠;清代《論語》簡論[D];華中師范大學;2002年
3 趙慶偉;清代孟學研究[D];華中師范大學;2002年
4 柳宏;清代《論語》詮釋史論[D];揚州大學;2004年
5 何海燕;清代《詩經》學研究[D];華中師范大學;2005年
6 文廷海;清代春秋谷梁學研究[D];華中師范大學;2005年
7 王應憲;清代吳派學術研究[D];華東師范大學;2007年
8 房瑞麗;清代三家《詩》研究[D];復旦大學;2007年
9 劉宗棠;清代《左傳》文獻研究[D];山東大學;2008年
10 彭喜雙;《爾雅》文獻研究[D];復旦大學;2009年
相關碩士學位論文 前3條
1 馬瑜;俞樾《詩經》研究的成就及影響[D];山西大學;2006年
2 趙景雪;清代《孝經》文獻研究[D];山東大學;2007年
3 吳保森;郭嵩燾三《質疑》研究[D];華東師范大學;2010年
，本文編號：2335528
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zgjxds/2335528.html
