百綴旗下的暗潮
發(fā)布時間：2018-11-07 11:55
【摘要】：護(hù)國戰(zhàn)爭是中國近代史上的重要事件。此次戰(zhàn)爭不僅結(jié)束了袁世凱的政治生涯,還開啟了中國近代史上的軍閥政治時代。在護(hù)國戰(zhàn)爭期間,護(hù)國軍和袁世凱的北洋軍兵戎相見：戰(zhàn)場之外,雙方還進(jìn)行了針鋒相對的政治博弈。然而,較之交戰(zhàn)雙方的你來我往,護(hù)國軍內(nèi)部的矛盾沖突更引人關(guān)注。 梁啟超和蔡鍔是護(hù)國戰(zhàn)爭的重要發(fā)動者。他們當(dāng)中,一是進(jìn)步黨黨魁,一為國家主義者,政治立場較為接近。此外,梁、蔡二人還兼有師生關(guān)系。惟其如此,他們的合作順理成章�？墒�,縱觀梁啟超和蔡鍔的合作者,并非清一色的國家主義者或是進(jìn)步黨人士：岑春煊、陸榮廷、李烈鈞、李根源、黃興、龍濟(jì)光等人所屬政團(tuán)、政治立場和政治關(guān)切均不相同。民國初年黨爭十分激烈,各政黨常常為了實現(xiàn)自身的政治訴求不顧國家利益展開一系列的明爭暗斗。而在護(hù)國戰(zhàn)爭中,這些持不同政見的人士能夠站在同一戰(zhàn)線上反對袁世凱復(fù)辟帝制——無論是出于自愿還是被迫,均值得深思。 護(hù)國戰(zhàn)爭前后,來自進(jìn)步黨、國民黨、西南地方實力派等政團(tuán)的人士在討袁這面大旗下組成了“護(hù)國陣營”與袁世凱集團(tuán)進(jìn)行軍事、政治斗爭。在護(hù)國陣營的建立過程中,各政治派別對自己的立場有所調(diào)整,在一些問題上互相妥協(xié),表現(xiàn)出一種“有彈性的堅定”。梁啟超因與袁世凱的政治理念的格格不入終于掛印而去,由原來的“挺袁派”一變而為“倒袁派”。國民黨方面,黃興、李根源等人并沒有計較二次革命時進(jìn)步黨的落井下石,而是積極與其合作參與護(hù)國戰(zhàn)爭的準(zhǔn)備工作。地方實力派中，唐繼堯、陸榮廷、龍濟(jì)光等人也出于現(xiàn)實因素和維護(hù)自身利益的考慮放棄了原來附從袁世凱政府的立場,或主動或被動地參與到護(hù)國戰(zhàn)爭中去。 為統(tǒng)合各方勢力,兩廣都司令部和肇慶軍務(wù)院孕育而生。這兩個機(jī)構(gòu)的組織形式、職責(zé)范圍和所起的作用雖不完全相同,但均通過吸納不同的政治勢力,并試圖在這些政治勢力問構(gòu)建一種非正式的、相對平等的協(xié)商機(jī)制來維護(hù)這種脆弱的合作。這種體制下沒有絕對權(quán)威,從而保證了各方擁有相對平等的話語權(quán)。而沒有絕對權(quán)威也就意味著組織內(nèi)部缺少必要的約束,使得護(hù)國陣營各派間的合作并不牢固。 袁世凱死后,段祺瑞作為北京政府的實際領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者對護(hù)國軍并未采取采取抗拒的態(tài)度,他通過各種非正式的手段與護(hù)國軍方面接洽,以便盡快結(jié)束南北對抗的狀態(tài)。在外界壓力緩解的情況下,護(hù)國陣營內(nèi)部各派本就不盡相同的政治訴求開始顯現(xiàn)。從暗中的勾心斗角到戰(zhàn)場上的兵戎相向,無不體現(xiàn)出不同的政治訴求對脆弱的政治聯(lián)盟的聯(lián)盟沖擊。在內(nèi)部的沖擊下,護(hù)國陣營的體系遭到了破壞,進(jìn)而自動分崩離析。從軍務(wù)院存廢問題的爭論,到軍務(wù)院的最后撤銷,正是護(hù)國陣營體系崩解的反映。
[Abstract]:The war of defense was an important event in China's modern history. The war not only ended Yuan Shikai's political career, but also opened the era of warlord politics in China's modern history. During the war of defense, the defending army and Yuan Shikai's Beiyang army fought against each other: in addition to the battlefield, the two sides engaged in a tit-for-tat political game. However, the conflict between the armed forces is more noticeable than the conflict between the two warring parties. Liang Qichao and Cai E were important initiators of the war. Among them, one is the leader of the Progressive Party, the other is a nationalist, the political position is relatively close. In addition, Liang and Cai also have a teacher-student relationship. Only then, their cooperation is logical. However, throughout Liang Qichao and Cai E's collaborators, they are not all nationalists or progressives: Cen Chunxuan, Lu Rongting, Li Lijun, Li root, Huang Xing, long Jiguang and others belong to political groups. Political positions and concerns differ. In the early years of the Republic of China, the political parties often engaged in a series of open and secret struggles in order to realize their own political demands and ignore the national interests. In the War of Patriotic Defence, these dissidents were able to stand on the same front against Yuan Shikai's restoration of the monarchy-voluntary or forced-which was worth pondering. Before and after the war, people from the Progressive Party, the Kuomintang, the Southwest local powerful faction and other political groups formed a "camp of defense" to wage military and political struggle against Yuan Shikai under the banner of Yuan. In the course of the establishment of the Protector camp, the political factions adjusted their positions and compromised each other on some issues, showing a "resilient firmness". Liang Qichao finally went away from the original "Yuan School" and changed to "inverted Yuan School" because of the mismatch between Liang Qichao and Yuan Shikai's political ideas. On the Kuomintang side, Huang Xing, Li Yuan and others did not worry about the fall of the Progressive Party at the time of the second Revolution, but actively cooperated with them to prepare for the war of defending the country. Among the local power schools, Tang Jiyao, Lu Rongting, long Jiguang and others gave up the position attached to Yuan Shikai's government or participated actively or passively in the defense of the country out of realistic factors and considerations of safeguarding their own interests. In order to integrate the various forces, the headquarters and Zhaoqing military headquarters were conceived. The organization, scope and role of these two institutions are not exactly the same, but by absorbing different political forces and trying to build an informal one in these political forces, A relatively equal consultation mechanism to preserve this fragile cooperation. There is no absolute authority in this system, thus ensuring that all parties have a relatively equal right to speak. The absence of absolute authority means that there is a lack of necessary constraints within the organization, making cooperation between the factions of the Protector not strong. After Yuan Shikai's death, Duan Qirui, as the actual leader of the Beijing government, did not take a resistance to the defense army. He approached the defense army through various informal means in order to end the North-South confrontation as soon as possible. With external pressure easing, political demands from different factions within the Protector camp are beginning to emerge. From the secret war to the battlefield, all reflect the alliance impact of different political demands on the fragile political alliance. Under the internal shock, the defending camp's system was destroyed and automatically disintegrated. From the debate about the retention and abolition of military affairs to the final withdrawal of military affairs, it is the collapse of the camp system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：K258
本文編號：2316287
[Abstract]:The war of defense was an important event in China's modern history. The war not only ended Yuan Shikai's political career, but also opened the era of warlord politics in China's modern history. During the war of defense, the defending army and Yuan Shikai's Beiyang army fought against each other: in addition to the battlefield, the two sides engaged in a tit-for-tat political game. However, the conflict between the armed forces is more noticeable than the conflict between the two warring parties. Liang Qichao and Cai E were important initiators of the war. Among them, one is the leader of the Progressive Party, the other is a nationalist, the political position is relatively close. In addition, Liang and Cai also have a teacher-student relationship. Only then, their cooperation is logical. However, throughout Liang Qichao and Cai E's collaborators, they are not all nationalists or progressives: Cen Chunxuan, Lu Rongting, Li Lijun, Li root, Huang Xing, long Jiguang and others belong to political groups. Political positions and concerns differ. In the early years of the Republic of China, the political parties often engaged in a series of open and secret struggles in order to realize their own political demands and ignore the national interests. In the War of Patriotic Defence, these dissidents were able to stand on the same front against Yuan Shikai's restoration of the monarchy-voluntary or forced-which was worth pondering. Before and after the war, people from the Progressive Party, the Kuomintang, the Southwest local powerful faction and other political groups formed a "camp of defense" to wage military and political struggle against Yuan Shikai under the banner of Yuan. In the course of the establishment of the Protector camp, the political factions adjusted their positions and compromised each other on some issues, showing a "resilient firmness". Liang Qichao finally went away from the original "Yuan School" and changed to "inverted Yuan School" because of the mismatch between Liang Qichao and Yuan Shikai's political ideas. On the Kuomintang side, Huang Xing, Li Yuan and others did not worry about the fall of the Progressive Party at the time of the second Revolution, but actively cooperated with them to prepare for the war of defending the country. Among the local power schools, Tang Jiyao, Lu Rongting, long Jiguang and others gave up the position attached to Yuan Shikai's government or participated actively or passively in the defense of the country out of realistic factors and considerations of safeguarding their own interests. In order to integrate the various forces, the headquarters and Zhaoqing military headquarters were conceived. The organization, scope and role of these two institutions are not exactly the same, but by absorbing different political forces and trying to build an informal one in these political forces, A relatively equal consultation mechanism to preserve this fragile cooperation. There is no absolute authority in this system, thus ensuring that all parties have a relatively equal right to speak. The absence of absolute authority means that there is a lack of necessary constraints within the organization, making cooperation between the factions of the Protector not strong. After Yuan Shikai's death, Duan Qirui, as the actual leader of the Beijing government, did not take a resistance to the defense army. He approached the defense army through various informal means in order to end the North-South confrontation as soon as possible. With external pressure easing, political demands from different factions within the Protector camp are beginning to emerge. From the secret war to the battlefield, all reflect the alliance impact of different political demands on the fragile political alliance. Under the internal shock, the defending camp's system was destroyed and automatically disintegrated. From the debate about the retention and abolition of military affairs to the final withdrawal of military affairs, it is the collapse of the camp system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：K258
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 黃宗炎;陸榮廷與護(hù)國戰(zhàn)爭[J];桂海論叢;2004年01期
2 李宜霞;論梁啟超的憲政思想[J];廣西師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2004年03期
3 林建曾;中國資產(chǎn)階級中間派的一次政治崛起——兼論蔡鍔在護(hù)國運動中的作用[J];貴州社會科學(xué);1983年06期
4 謝本書;護(hù)國運動史的幾個問題[J];貴州社會科學(xué);1982年05期
5 曾業(yè)英;;中華民國軍務(wù)院成立述評[J];貴州文史叢刊;1986年03期
6 馮祖貽;;論護(hù)國運動中梁啟超與陸榮廷的互動[J];貴州文史叢刊;2009年04期
7 謝本書;護(hù)國運動史研究述評[J];近代史研究;1987年05期
8 饒珍芳 ,余根省;梁啟超與護(hù)國戰(zhàn)爭[J];華南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版));1983年04期
9 余子明;護(hù)國戰(zhàn)爭的法律問題[J];四川大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2002年01期
10 叢曙光;論護(hù)國運動中的梁啟超[J];山東師大學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1996年02期
，本文編號：2316287
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zgjxds/2316287.html
