日本“南進(jìn)政策”原因探析
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-09-13 06:50
【摘要】：“南進(jìn)政策”是明治維新后日本逐漸形成的一種對(duì)外擴(kuò)張政策,其形成發(fā)展經(jīng)歷了一個(gè)較長(zhǎng)的時(shí)期�！澳线M(jìn)政策”作為日本對(duì)外擴(kuò)張核心思想之一,對(duì)日本近代以來(lái)的外交以及戰(zhàn)略決策起到了重大影響。一戰(zhàn)期間,由于歐美列強(qiáng)忙于歐戰(zhàn)無(wú)暇東顧,日本乘機(jī)迅速擴(kuò)張?jiān)跂|亞的勢(shì)力,成為英美等國(guó)在遠(yuǎn)東及太平洋地區(qū)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手。一戰(zhàn)后,世界秩序逐漸恢復(fù),東亞及太平洋地區(qū)再次成為列強(qiáng)關(guān)注的重要地區(qū)。此時(shí)日本的國(guó)力雖有明顯提高,但相對(duì)于英美等國(guó)還有明顯差距。因此在英美等國(guó)的壓力下日本最終放棄了部分利益,以緩和與英美的緊張局面。進(jìn)入20世紀(jì)30年代,國(guó)際形勢(shì)再度發(fā)生重大變化,德國(guó)、日本、意大利等國(guó)相繼建立起法西斯政權(quán)。日本和德國(guó)作為東西兩個(gè)重要的法西斯國(guó)家為了自己的世界霸業(yè),開始瘋狂擴(kuò)張。其中值得我們注意的是,日本并沒(méi)有如英美等國(guó)所預(yù)料的那樣選擇“北進(jìn)”、與德國(guó)一起包夾蘇聯(lián)。即便在德國(guó)軍隊(duì)進(jìn)逼莫斯科城下的時(shí)候,日本還是放棄了“北進(jìn)”而專事南方。這一戰(zhàn)略選擇對(duì)第二次世界大戰(zhàn)的進(jìn)程和格局產(chǎn)生了重大的影響,可見(jiàn)研究此期間日本由“北進(jìn)”向“南進(jìn)”轉(zhuǎn)變的原因具有重要價(jià)值。 “南進(jìn)政策”一直是學(xué)術(shù)界長(zhǎng)期以來(lái)關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn)問(wèn)題之一,對(duì)于日本“北進(jìn)政策”向“南進(jìn)政策”轉(zhuǎn)變的研究成果也較為豐富。但是這些研究成果或限于篇幅或限于主旨,并沒(méi)有全面的描述出這一時(shí)期日本發(fā)生政策變化的過(guò)程及要因,往往造成讀者理解的片面化。有鑒于此,筆者擬從南北對(duì)比、中國(guó)戰(zhàn)場(chǎng)、日蘇碰撞、日本與歐美主要國(guó)家關(guān)系等四個(gè)方面,對(duì)造成日本最終選擇“南進(jìn)”政策進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)研究。 本研究較多地采用了比較研究法,兼用文獻(xiàn)閱讀法與歸納法等,對(duì)1936—1941年間日本對(duì)外擴(kuò)張政策的轉(zhuǎn)變進(jìn)行了梳理與分析,最終用史實(shí)說(shuō)明了日本選擇“南進(jìn)政策”的原因有根本原因、直接原因與間接原因等。
[Abstract]:After Meiji Restoration, Japan gradually formed a kind of foreign expansion policy, and its formation and development experienced a long period. As one of the core ideas of Japan's foreign expansion, the "southward advance policy" has played a significant role in Japan's diplomacy and strategic decision since modern times. During the first World War, because the European and American powers were busy with the European war, Japan took the opportunity to expand its power in East Asia and became a competitor of the United States and the United States in the far East and the Pacific. After World War I, the world order was gradually restored, and East Asia and the Pacific region once again became an important region concerned by the powers. At this time, although Japan's national strength has significantly improved, but compared with the United States and other countries there is a clear gap. So under pressure from countries such as the US and the UK, Japan finally gave up some of its interests to ease tensions with the UK and the US. In the 1930s, the international situation again changed, Germany, Japan, Italy and other countries have established fascist regimes. Japan and Germany as two important fascist countries, for their own world hegemony, began to expand madly. It is worth noting that Japan did not choose to move northward with Germany, as countries such as the United States and the United States had expected. Even as the German army moved under Moscow, Japan gave up "north" and concentrated on the south. This strategic choice has had a great impact on the process and pattern of World War II, so it is of great value to study the reasons for Japan's transition from "northward" to "southward" during this period. "the policy of southward advance" has been one of the focal issues that the academic circles have paid close attention to for a long time, and the research results on the transformation of Japan's "northward policy" to "southward policy" are also relatively rich. However, these research results are limited to space or purport, and do not describe the process and reasons of policy change in Japan during this period, which often result in the one-sided understanding of the readers. In view of this, the author intends to make a systematic study on the policy of "advancing southward" in Japan's final choice from four aspects: the contrast between North and South, the battlefield of China, the collision between Japan and the Soviet Union, and the relations between Japan and the major countries of Europe and the United States. This study mainly adopts the comparative research method and the literature reading method and inductive method to sort out and analyze the transformation of Japan's foreign expansion policy from 1936 to 1941. Finally, the paper explains the basic reasons, direct reasons and indirect reasons of Japan's choice of "southward advance policy" with historical facts.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：K265
本文編號(hào)：2240400
[Abstract]:After Meiji Restoration, Japan gradually formed a kind of foreign expansion policy, and its formation and development experienced a long period. As one of the core ideas of Japan's foreign expansion, the "southward advance policy" has played a significant role in Japan's diplomacy and strategic decision since modern times. During the first World War, because the European and American powers were busy with the European war, Japan took the opportunity to expand its power in East Asia and became a competitor of the United States and the United States in the far East and the Pacific. After World War I, the world order was gradually restored, and East Asia and the Pacific region once again became an important region concerned by the powers. At this time, although Japan's national strength has significantly improved, but compared with the United States and other countries there is a clear gap. So under pressure from countries such as the US and the UK, Japan finally gave up some of its interests to ease tensions with the UK and the US. In the 1930s, the international situation again changed, Germany, Japan, Italy and other countries have established fascist regimes. Japan and Germany as two important fascist countries, for their own world hegemony, began to expand madly. It is worth noting that Japan did not choose to move northward with Germany, as countries such as the United States and the United States had expected. Even as the German army moved under Moscow, Japan gave up "north" and concentrated on the south. This strategic choice has had a great impact on the process and pattern of World War II, so it is of great value to study the reasons for Japan's transition from "northward" to "southward" during this period. "the policy of southward advance" has been one of the focal issues that the academic circles have paid close attention to for a long time, and the research results on the transformation of Japan's "northward policy" to "southward policy" are also relatively rich. However, these research results are limited to space or purport, and do not describe the process and reasons of policy change in Japan during this period, which often result in the one-sided understanding of the readers. In view of this, the author intends to make a systematic study on the policy of "advancing southward" in Japan's final choice from four aspects: the contrast between North and South, the battlefield of China, the collision between Japan and the Soviet Union, and the relations between Japan and the major countries of Europe and the United States. This study mainly adopts the comparative research method and the literature reading method and inductive method to sort out and analyze the transformation of Japan's foreign expansion policy from 1936 to 1941. Finally, the paper explains the basic reasons, direct reasons and indirect reasons of Japan's choice of "southward advance policy" with historical facts.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：K265
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 孫少艾;日本的北進(jìn)南進(jìn)策略與中國(guó)戰(zhàn)場(chǎng)[J];安慶師院社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1995年04期
2 邢克鑫;;日本北進(jìn)戰(zhàn)略計(jì)劃的流產(chǎn)及對(duì)二戰(zhàn)的影響[J];安陽(yáng)師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期
3 高強(qiáng);日本南進(jìn)軍事戰(zhàn)略形成及其失敗的主要因素[J];大連大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1995年02期
4 喜富裕;論日本“北進(jìn)”戰(zhàn)略實(shí)施中的大國(guó)外交[J];甘肅高師學(xué)報(bào);2002年04期
5 王振德;中國(guó)抗日戰(zhàn)場(chǎng)與第二次世界大戰(zhàn)[J];世界歷史;1984年05期
6 李凡;中立:日本對(duì)蘇政策的選擇(1939—1941)[J];世界歷史;1990年02期
7 余子道;中國(guó)抗戰(zhàn)與日本的南進(jìn)政策[J];江海學(xué)刊;1995年02期
8 李小白;周頌倫;;日本北進(jìn)、南進(jìn)戰(zhàn)略演進(jìn)過(guò)程述考[J];抗日戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)研究;2010年01期
9 李凡;諾門坎事件爆發(fā)原因及對(duì)日蘇關(guān)系的影響[J];歷史教學(xué);2003年10期
10 黃光耀;中國(guó)抗戰(zhàn)與日本南進(jìn)政策的選擇[J];南京師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年06期
，本文編號(hào)：2240400
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zgjxds/2240400.html
教材專著
