國(guó)民黨與五四紀(jì)念(1919-1949)
[Abstract]:Since the May 4th Movement, the annual May 4th memorial has been formed, which has continued to the present, and it itself has become an important phenomenon in the modern history of China. From the perspective of the May 4th Memorial, this paper analyzes the relevant historical data of the May 4th Movement commemorated by the Kuomintang from 1919 to 1949, and shows the complicated interaction between the historical memory of the May fourth Memorial and the realistic politics. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the paper is divided into three parts: the first part: young students showed great political power during the May 4th Movement, and Sun Zhongshan quickly supported the attitude, in the May 4th Memorial meeting organized by academic circles. The main leaders of the KMT actively participated in the speech, using the occasion of the speech to make speeches and explain the importance attached to the strength of young students. The second part expounds that the establishment of the Nanjing National Government was an important period for the KMT to commemorate the May 4th Movement. After 1933, the May 4th Memorial was deliberately forgotten by the KMT. After 1939, the Kuomintang restarted the May 4th Memorial. The memorial of the May 4th Movement in this period was mainly related closely to the policy program promulgated by the Kuomintang to mobilize young people to serve the War of Resistance and to deliberately strengthen the position of Jiang Jieshi in the War of Resistance and the importance of the founding of the people's Republic of China. After the end of the War of Resistance against Japan, the Kuomintang's May 4th memorial turned to the Communist Party and began to denounce and denigrate the Communist Party. The third part, around the emergence and outcome of the May 4th Movement, the KMT intends to bring the May fourth Movement into the theoretical construction of the three people's principles of its political ideology, which is a useful resource for the Kuomintang to choose subjectively the May 4th Movement. In order to stimulate the emergence of public opinion in the service of governance, strengthen the legitimacy of political existence. The position of the Kuomintang on the May 4th Movement changed with the change of the situation: the May 4th Movement was a patriotic movement for students, the revolutionary movement upgraded from the patriotic movement to the three people's principles, the spirit of the May 4th Movement was anti-Japanese, and it was a national salvation movement. The Kuomintang reiterated the patriotic spirit of the May 4 th Movement and stressed that the May 4th Movement was an anti-warlord anti-secession movement. With the development of the current situation, the subjective need of the Kuomintang to commemorate the May 4th Movement has become the meaning of the May 4th memorial. In order to serve the present, the change of the social situation requires the Kuomintang to keep presenting the May 4th memorial, according to the current situation and the needs of the rule, select appropriate content to be used. In the May 4th memorial, the Kuomintang should infiltrate the political value concept and policy program, mobilize young students to respond to the policies of the Kuomintang, and make the young students keep their loyalty to their political system. It can be said that the KMT commemorating the May 4th Movement at the same time is a process of constructing the memory of the May fourth Movement. This process has a continuous function. It is not an isolated review of the May fourth Movement, but a series of narrations of practical significance. KMT's memory of the May 4th Movement was closely related to the situation, and one of its important functions was to meet the spiritual needs of the situation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類號(hào)】:K26
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條
1 郭若平;;意義的賦予:時(shí)勢(shì)轉(zhuǎn)移與“五四”話語(yǔ)的演變[J];安徽史學(xué);2008年05期
2 王海玲;莫琪;;淺析莫里斯·哈布瓦赫的集體記憶[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年12期
3 歐陽(yáng)軍喜;;學(xué)運(yùn)與黨爭(zhēng):以1937年北平“五四事件”為中心[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年05期
4 董德福;;關(guān)于五四運(yùn)動(dòng)研究的三個(gè)問(wèn)題——從國(guó)共兩黨紀(jì)念五四運(yùn)動(dòng)談起[J];江蘇大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年03期
5 歐陽(yáng)軍喜;是“五四”,不是“五四”[J];民主與科學(xué);2000年02期
6 羅志田;歷史創(chuàng)造者對(duì)歷史的再創(chuàng)造:修改“五四”歷史記憶的一次嘗試[J];四川大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年05期
7 吳海勇;;1928年至1948年《中央日?qǐng)?bào)》對(duì)五四運(yùn)動(dòng)的評(píng)論[J];上海黨史與黨建;2009年05期
8 趙春e,
本文編號(hào):2189922
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zgjxds/2189922.html