本文選題：亡國史 + 中韓關系　； 參考：《復旦大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：日韓合并之后,中國出現了大量對朝鮮亡國過程、亡國原因、亡國影響進行敘述或評析的書籍與文章,本文將之統(tǒng)稱為“朝鮮亡國著述”。這類書籍和文章是研究近代中國人對朝鮮亡國問題認知的第一手資料,也是透視近代中國與朝鮮半島關系、近代中國人對東亞和世界認知的窗口。本文主要對這一類史料進行搜集、整理,對近代中國的朝鮮亡國著述的特點進行歸納與比較分析,梳理其中呈現的多樣化觀點,希望為今后的進一步研究打下基礎。 最早討論朝鮮亡國議題的是1904年《新民從報》連載的梁啟超《朝鮮亡國史略》。依據載體的不同,朝鮮亡國著述可分書藉與報刊兩種形式。最早的論述朝鮮亡國主題的書籍是1911年6月出版于上海的《近世亡國史》�，F存的這類書籍共有十四種,包括專論朝鮮事務的單行本三種,匯集朝鮮及其他各亡國史事的合編本七種,小說演義四種。這十四種書籍中,出版于上海的有十三種、出版于北京的一種。以媒體報道形式出現的亡國論述主要出現在1904年到1911年之間,1911年以后逐漸減少。 作為“殷鑒”目的而寫作的朝鮮亡國著述,“宣傳性”表現得特別明顯,并且都特別注重分析朝鮮亡國的原因。1915年以前的論述往往指朝鮮的內部落后因素是其亡國的根本原因,隨著中日關系的日益緊張和中國社會對日態(tài)度的變化,日本的強權侵略逐漸被認為是朝鮮亡國的首要原因。與此相伴的,朝鮮人的形象從天性的“亡國奴”變?yōu)椤叭珖駳庖恢聭嵓さ拿褡濉?而對日本在朝鮮半島殖民統(tǒng)治的評價,則由中性轉向貶斥。因此,作為一種文化符號的“朝鮮”,很大程度上是由中國知識分子因應本國的局勢而塑造出來的。從朝鮮亡國中能得到什么教訓,比朝鮮亡國本身更加重要。
[Abstract]:After the merger of Japan and South Korea, a large number of books and articles about the process of Korean subjugation, the cause of subjugation and the influence of subjugation appeared in China. This kind of books and articles are the first-hand materials to study the understanding of Korean subjugation in modern China, and also the window of understanding the relationship between China and the Korean Peninsula and the cognition of East Asia and the world in modern China. This paper mainly collects and collates this kind of historical data, sums up and compares the characteristics of the works of Korean subjugation in modern China, combs the diversified viewpoints presented therein, and hopes to lay a foundation for further research in the future. The earliest topic to discuss the subject of Korean subjugation was Liang Qichao, A History of Korean subjugation, published in the New people's Daily in 1904. According to the carrier, North Korea can be divided into two forms: books and newspapers. The earliest book on the subject of Korean subjugation was published in Shanghai in June 1911. There are 14 kinds of such books, including three monographs devoted to Korean affairs, seven kinds of compilation of Korean and other history of subjugation, and four kinds of novels. Thirteen of these 14 books are published in Shanghai and one in Beijing. The exposition of national subjugation in the form of media reports mainly appeared between 1904 and 1911, and gradually decreased after 1911. North Korea's writings on national subjugation, which were written for the purpose of "Yin Jian", were particularly obvious and paid special attention to the analysis of the reasons for Korea's subjugation. Prior to 1915, it was often pointed out that the internal backwardness of the DPRK was the fundamental cause of its subjugation. With the increasing tension between China and Japan and the change of Chinese society's attitude toward Japan, Japanese power aggression is gradually regarded as the primary cause of Korean subjugation. At the same time, the image of Korean changed from the nature of "subjugated slaves" to "the whole nation", and the evaluation of Japanese colonial rule on the Korean peninsula changed from neutral to derogatory. Therefore, North Korea, as a cultural symbol, was shaped largely by Chinese intellectuals in response to the situation in their own country. What lessons can be learned from North Korea's subjugation is more important than North Korea's subjugation itself.
【學位授予單位】：復旦大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：K257

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 延棠;;金正恩:矚目的朝鮮“80后”[J];w，

本文編號：2118202