本文選題：宗藩體系 + 中日修好條規(guī)�。� 參考：《近代史研究》2016年06期

【摘要】：《中日修好條規(guī)》歷來被視為近代中日兩國的唯一對等條約。可嗣后清朝藩屬國的次第喪失事件和臺灣日據(jù)事件每每被處理成彼此無涉的孤立個案等研究現(xiàn)狀表明,中國學界對于條規(guī)本身的對等屬性問題尚缺少體系性的反思。事實上,肇端于牡丹社事件的日本征臺、巧取琉球、并吞朝鮮以及甲午戰(zhàn)后的割占臺灣等事件,無一不根源于條規(guī)這一法理前提。日本拆解宗藩體系的整體設(shè)計與虛實進路意味著,條規(guī)的簽署,不但讓中方喪失了東亞的傳統(tǒng)核心地位,還使清廷在日方的公法惡用下無法不棄琉保臺、棄韓自保直至割臺茍安。近代以降東亞世界的整體變局和日本對鄰國的侵越與壓迫,亦始自條規(guī),成于條規(guī)。
[Abstract]:The Sino-Japanese Friendship Regulation has always been regarded as the only reciprocal treaty between China and Japan in modern times. The subsequent secondary loss of the subordinate states of the Qing Dynasty and the Japanese occupation events in Taiwan are often dealt with as isolated cases which have nothing to do with each other, indicating that there is still a lack of systematic reflection on the reciprocal nature of the rules in Chinese academic circles. In fact, the Japanese invasion of Taiwan, which originated in the Peony Society incident, the skillful acquisition of Ryukyu, the annexation of Korea and the occupation of Taiwan after the Sino-Japanese War of 1894, all originated from the legal premise of rules and regulations. The overall design of Japan's dismantling of the Suzerain-vassal system and its approach to the virtual reality meant that the signing of the rules and regulations not only deprived the Chinese side of their traditional core status in East Asia, but also made it impossible for the Qing Dynasty to abandon the protection of Taiwan under the evil use of Japanese public law. Abandon Han Zipao until the cutting stage is meticulous. In modern times, the whole change of the East Asian world and Japan's invasion and oppression of neighboring countries began from rules and regulations.
【作者單位】： 東北師范大學歷史文化學院;
【基金】：國家社科基金重大項目“東亞史上的‘落差—穩(wěn)定’結(jié)構(gòu)與區(qū)域走向分析”(15ZDB063)結(jié)項成果之一
【分類號】：K252

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 臧蕾;;甲午海戰(zhàn)前的臺日交流[J];佳木斯教育學院學報;2012年04期

，

本文編號：2064553