本文選題：五四運(yùn)動(dòng) + 反帝反封建�。� 參考：《思想理論教育導(dǎo)刊》2017年12期

【摘要】：五四運(yùn)動(dòng)是中國(guó)近代史上一次徹底的反帝反封建的偉大的愛(ài)國(guó)運(yùn)動(dòng)。從五四運(yùn)動(dòng)的斗爭(zhēng)指向看,雖然沒(méi)有直接提出打倒帝國(guó)主義的口號(hào),但是斗爭(zhēng)的靶子直接指向曹汝霖、章宗祥、陸宗輿三人的賣(mài)國(guó)行徑,實(shí)際上把斗爭(zhēng)指向北洋政府及其賣(mài)國(guó)政策。北洋軍閥政府罷免賣(mài)國(guó)賊曹汝霖、章宗祥、陸宗輿以及在巴黎和會(huì)拒簽和約,是廣大人民同北洋政府進(jìn)行不屈不撓的斗爭(zhēng)而最終取得的勝利成果。有的人無(wú)視歷史事實(shí)為北洋軍閥辯護(hù),是完全違背歷史事實(shí)的。
[Abstract]:The May 4 th Movement was a thorough anti-imperialist and anti-feudal patriotic movement in Chinese modern history. Judging from the direction of the struggle of the May 4th Movement, although the slogan of overthrowing imperialism was not put forward directly, the target of the struggle was directed directly at the traitorous acts of Cao Rulin, Zhang Zongxiang and Lu Zongyu. In fact, the struggle was directed against the Beiyang government and its policy of betrayal. The dismissal of traitors Cao Rulin, Zhang Zongxiang, Lu Zongyu and the refusal of the peace treaty at the Paris Peace Association by the Northern warlord government was the ultimate victory of the broad masses of the people in their indomitable struggle with the Beiyang government. Some people ignore the historical facts to defend the Northern warlords, is completely contrary to the historical facts.
【作者單位】： 福建師范大學(xué)馬克思主義學(xué)院;閩江學(xué)院馬克思主義學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：K261.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張皓;王純;;“人民大眾的反帝反封建的文化”的歷史考察[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年05期

2 王治濤;;《五四“反帝反封建”辨析》之辨析——與李新宇先生的若干商榷[J];鄭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年04期

3 王彥;;五四的主題[J];思想理論教育導(dǎo)刊;1999年05期

4 吳雁南;略論一九○一至一九○五年間農(nóng)民群眾反帝反封建的斗爭(zhēng)[J];山西師院;1978年03期

5 聶玉寬;正確認(rèn)識(shí)“五四”運(yùn)動(dòng)反帝反封建的徹底性[J];保定師范專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2002年03期

6 趙永良;傅克順;翁祖o，

本文編號(hào)：1830970