本文選題：東吳大學(xué)法科　切入點(diǎn)：圣約翰大學(xué)　出處：《東吳學(xué)術(shù)》2017年02期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：東吳大學(xué)法科作為近代中國法律教育史上的著名法學(xué)院校,歷來備受學(xué)界關(guān)注,但在創(chuàng)辦之初,它與圣約翰大學(xué)的聯(lián)系卻不被世人所知。卜舫濟(jì)與蘭金對法律教育曾經(jīng)有過不同的見解,但在培養(yǎng)信奉基督教的法律人這一點(diǎn)上達(dá)成了一致,東吳法科的教學(xué)也曾一度披上了宗教的外衣,直接影響到了其畢業(yè)生吳經(jīng)熊的英美法水平不被美國大法官霍姆斯等人認(rèn)可。一九二○年后,法科的辦學(xué)重回正軌,并且確立了以英美法和比較法為教學(xué)特色,進(jìn)而也對上海其他法律院校的教學(xué)產(chǎn)生了影響,例如國立暨南大學(xué)法律系幾乎照搬了東吳法科的辦學(xué)模式,這也體現(xiàn)出了東吳法科對近代上海法學(xué)教育的推動(dòng)作用。
[Abstract]:As a famous law college in the history of legal education in modern China, the law department of Soochow University has always attracted the attention of scholars, but at the beginning of its establishment, Its association with St. John's University is not known to the world. Bofangzi and Rankin once had different views on legal education, but they agreed on the cultivation of Christian lawyers. The teaching of Soochow Law was once dressed in the guise of religion, which directly affected the Anglo-American law level of its graduate, Wu Jingxiong, and was not recognized by US Justice Holmes and others. Since 1920, the school of law has returned to the right track. It also established the characteristics of Anglo-American law and comparative law, which also influenced the teaching of other law schools in Shanghai. For example, the law department of National Jinan University almost copied the mode of running a school of dongwu law course. This also reflects the promotion of law education in modern Shanghai by the science of law of Soochow.
【分類號】：K258;D929

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 董節(jié)英;;晚清法科留學(xué)生與中國法制近代化[J];歷史教學(xué)(高校版);2009年09期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 張?zhí)?文理之爭：民國時(shí)的一次教育大討論[N];學(xué)習(xí)時(shí)報(bào);2006年

2 陜西省西安市中級人民法院 康寶奇;法科留學(xué)與留美幼童[N];人民法院報(bào);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 楊瑞;通向?qū)W術(shù)之路：蔡元培與北大法科的學(xué)術(shù)化進(jìn)程（1916-1927）[D];四川大學(xué);2006年

2 王麗珍;民國時(shí)期法學(xué)教育的歷史與反思[D];煙臺(tái)大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號：1604923