本文選題：李鴻章　切入點(diǎn)：李鴻章形象　出處：《華中師范大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：本文梳理了百多年來(lái)人們對(duì)李鴻章的評(píng)價(jià),較真實(shí)地再現(xiàn)不同時(shí)期的李鴻章形象及李鴻章形象的變化過(guò)程,并分析了影響李鴻章形象變化的因素。 清末各政治群體對(duì)李鴻章評(píng)價(jià)各異。在朝廷的眼中,李鴻章是忠臣,清流派卻認(rèn)為李鴻章是奸臣。然而,他們?cè)诟邮伦兒髤s稱贊李鴻章的內(nèi)政和外交功績(jī)。洋務(wù)派認(rèn)同李鴻章的“忠臣”形象,但與朝廷和清流派不同,他們著重肯定李鴻章所辦洋務(wù)的功績(jī)。維新派雖然對(duì)李鴻章頗有微詞,但基本肯定了李鴻章是個(gè)正面人物。革命派全面否定李鴻章,認(rèn)為他是“漢奸”。民國(guó)遺民型學(xué)者延續(xù)了鑒戒史學(xué)對(duì)李鴻章的評(píng)價(jià),認(rèn)為他是個(gè)“忠臣”。近代化論者堅(jiān)持李鴻章領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的洋務(wù)運(yùn)動(dòng)促進(jìn)了中國(guó)的近代化事業(yè),是中國(guó)近代化的先聲。而與此觀點(diǎn)相對(duì)立的馬克思主義學(xué)者卻抨擊李鴻章是“萬(wàn)惡的民賊”、“反革命的魁首”、“滿洲人的奴才”、“永遠(yuǎn)的投降派”。1949年以后馬克思主義學(xué)者支配史壇,李鴻章成為“賣國(guó)賊”,直到20世紀(jì)80年代末李鴻章形象被重塑,成為中國(guó)“邁向現(xiàn)代化的第一人”。 從清末、民國(guó)到新中國(guó),李鴻章形象的變化很大。筆者認(rèn)為影響李鴻章形象的因素有三個(gè),政治因素、價(jià)值觀變化和史學(xué)理論與方法的變化,并逐一進(jìn)行了較深刻地分析。 結(jié)語(yǔ)探討了李鴻章形象的塑造過(guò)程中存在的一些問(wèn)題,通過(guò)對(duì)這些問(wèn)題的思考,對(duì)歷史人物評(píng)價(jià)的理論與方法進(jìn)行重新的認(rèn)識(shí),并對(duì)人物評(píng)價(jià)未來(lái)的發(fā)展進(jìn)行展望。
[Abstract]:This paper combs the people's evaluation of Li Hongzhang for more than a hundred years, reproduces the changing process of Li Hongzhang image and Li Hongzhang image in different periods, and analyzes the factors that influence the change of Li Hongzhang image. At the end of the Qing Dynasty, various political groups had different comments on Li Hongzhang. In the eyes of the imperial court, Li Hongzhang was a loyal minister, while the Qing school considered Li Hongzhang to be a traitor. However, After the Gengzi incident, they praised Li Hongzhang for his domestic and diplomatic achievements. Westernists agreed with Li Hongzhang's "loyal minister" image, but unlike the imperial court and the Qing school, They emphasized on the merits of Li Hongzhang's Westernization work. Although the reformists had a lot of disapproval of Li Hongzhang, they basically affirmed that Li Hongzhang was an upright figure. The revolutionaries completely denied Li Hongzhang. He was regarded as a "traitors". The relic scholars of the Republic of China continued to judge Li Hongzhang as a "loyal minister" in the historiography of the Republic of China. The modernization theorists insisted that the Westernization Movement led by Li Hongzhang had promoted the cause of modernization in China. The Marxist scholars opposed to this view criticized Li Hongzhang for being the "villain of all evils", "the leader of the counter-revolution", "the slave of the Manchuria" and "the forever capitulationist". After 1949, Marxist scholars dominated the history world. Li Hongzhang became a traitor until the end of 1980s when Li Hongzhang's image was reshaped and China became the first man to move toward modernization. From the late Qing Dynasty to the Republic of China to New China, Li Hongzhang's image has changed greatly. The author thinks that there are three factors that influence the image of Li Hongzhang: political factor, value change and the change of historical theory and method, and makes a deep analysis one by one. The conclusion discusses some problems existing in the process of creating Li Hongzhang's image, through the reflection of these problems, the author reunderstands the theory and method of historical character evaluation, and looks forward to the future development of character evaluation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：K256

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 高娟;甲午前二十余年間李鴻章對(duì)朝鮮的措置[D];華中師范大學(xué);2012年

2 田淑芳;李鴻章的社會(huì)整合與控制思想研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2013年

3 歐軼松;文學(xué)中的國(guó)變眾生相[D];華中師范大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1583561