本文選題：國民黨　切入點(diǎn)：民眾運(yùn)動(dòng)　出處：《吉林大學(xué)》2012年博士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：論文首先詳細(xì)論述了國民黨從北伐開始之前一直到南京國民政府成立之后對(duì)民眾運(yùn)動(dòng)的不同態(tài)度，指出在第一次國共合作、國民黨改組之后，國民黨越來越注重民眾運(yùn)動(dòng)，意識(shí)到民眾中蘊(yùn)含著偉大力量，是推動(dòng)革命的主力軍。但是在北伐進(jìn)行過程中，由于國共兩黨對(duì)民眾運(yùn)動(dòng)的不同態(tài)度，以及國民黨自身對(duì)于民眾運(yùn)動(dòng)掌控能力不足導(dǎo)致國民黨上層逐步改變了對(duì)民眾運(yùn)動(dòng)的態(tài)度。論文緊接著指出在南京國民政府成立之后，對(duì)民眾運(yùn)動(dòng)的態(tài)度從積極支持變?yōu)榻吡刂�，力圖將民眾運(yùn)動(dòng)的規(guī)模、范圍控制在自己手中。 論文然后敘述了南京國民政府成立以后，中央民眾訓(xùn)練機(jī)構(gòu)的發(fā)展和演變，指出大革命時(shí)期的工人、農(nóng)民、商人、婦女、青年五部已經(jīng)不復(fù)存在，取而代之的是國民黨中央民眾訓(xùn)練委員會(huì)、國民黨中央訓(xùn)練部等機(jī)構(gòu)。論文認(rèn)為隨著國民黨對(duì)民眾運(yùn)動(dòng)態(tài)度的變化，中央民眾訓(xùn)練機(jī)構(gòu)也隨之變化，而且國民黨中央民眾訓(xùn)練機(jī)構(gòu)中所謂的“訓(xùn)練”，論文認(rèn)為是使受訓(xùn)者（民眾）接受國民黨的一黨專政，成為國民一黨獨(dú)裁統(tǒng)治下的順民。論文指出國民黨中央民眾指導(dǎo)委員會(huì)階段僅僅是國民黨中央民眾訓(xùn)練機(jī)構(gòu)的過渡階段，沒有太多可以著墨的地方，而國民黨中央訓(xùn)練部階段和國民黨民眾運(yùn)動(dòng)指導(dǎo)委員會(huì)階段是在國民黨基本確定訓(xùn)政之后，這兩個(gè)階段是與國民黨訓(xùn)政時(shí)期要求訓(xùn)育民眾成為三民主義的忠實(shí)信徒這一宗旨相對(duì)應(yīng)。 論文隨后指出，在日本帝國主義入侵的的歷史背景下，民族矛盾超越階級(jí)矛盾上升為當(dāng)時(shí)中國的主要矛盾，國民黨對(duì)日態(tài)度發(fā)生較大改變，國民黨在此時(shí)也改變了對(duì)民眾運(yùn)動(dòng)的態(tài)度，提出要依靠民眾、發(fā)動(dòng)民眾，發(fā)展民眾運(yùn)動(dòng)以抵抗日本帝國主義的入侵。論文指出，在日本帝國主義全面入侵的歷史關(guān)頭，國共雙方再次合作，國民黨對(duì)于民眾運(yùn)動(dòng)的態(tài)度變化是國民黨正確轉(zhuǎn)變的一個(gè)重要方面。論文最后指出，國民黨中央民眾訓(xùn)練機(jī)構(gòu)的發(fā)展演變只是機(jī)構(gòu)上的變化，國民黨與民眾之間的關(guān)系實(shí)質(zhì)上并未隨著機(jī)構(gòu)的變化發(fā)生質(zhì)的變化，因?yàn)閲顸h并不是一個(gè)組織嚴(yán)密的政黨，南京國民政府建立前不是，南京國民政府成立后仍然不是，，其黨內(nèi)政治派別眾多，而且國民黨政府并不是一個(gè)嚴(yán)格意義上的黨治政府，黨部的權(quán)力并不能凌駕于政府之上，這最終導(dǎo)致不管其中央民眾訓(xùn)練機(jī)構(gòu)如何變化,但是國民黨政府并不能真正地掌控民眾。
[Abstract]:First of all, the paper discusses in detail the different attitudes of the Kuomintang to the mass movement from the beginning of the Northern Expedition to the establishment of the Nanjing National Government, and points out that after the first KMT cooperation and the KMT reorganization, the KMT has paid more and more attention to the mass movement. Aware that there is a great power among the people and that they are the main force to promote the revolution. But during the Northern Expedition, due to the different attitudes of the Kuomintang and the Communist Party towards the mass movement, And the lack of control over the popular movement by the Kuomintang itself has led to a gradual change in the attitude of the upper levels of the Kuomintang towards the popular movement. The paper then points out that after the establishment of the Nanjing National Government, The attitude towards the mass movement changed from active support to hard control, trying to control the scale and scope of the mass movement in their own hands. The paper then describes the development and evolution of the central people's training institutions after the establishment of the Nanjing National Government, and points out that the five ministries of workers, peasants, businessmen, women and young people no longer exist during the Great Revolution. Instead, the KMT Central people's training Committee, the KMT Central training Department, and other organizations. The paper believes that with the change of the KMT's attitude towards the mass movement, the central people's training institutions will also change. Moreover, the so-called "training" in the Kuomintang Central people's training Institution is considered in the paper to make the trainees (the public) accept the Kuomintang one-party dictatorship. The paper points out that the stage of the KMT Central people's steering Committee is only a transitional stage of the Kuomintang Central people's training Institute, and there is not much to be learned about it. And the stage of the KMT Central training Department and the KMT popular Movement steering Committee stage is after the KMT has basically decided on the training policy. These two stages correspond to the aim of the Kuomintang to teach the people to become faithful believers of the three people's principles. The paper then points out that under the historical background of the Japanese imperialist invasion, the ethnic contradictions surmounted the class contradictions and became the main contradictions in China at that time, and the KMT's attitude towards Japan changed greatly. At this time, the Kuomintang also changed its attitude towards the mass movement, proposing that it should rely on the people, mobilize the people, and develop the mass movement to resist the invasion of Japanese imperialism. The paper points out that at the historical juncture of the Japanese imperialist invasion, The KMT and the Communist Party have again cooperated, and the change in the KMT's attitude towards the mass movement is an important aspect of the correct transformation of the KMT. Finally, the paper points out that the development and evolution of the KMT Central people's training Institution is only an institutional change. In essence, the relationship between the Kuomintang and the people has not changed qualitatively with the changes in institutions, because the KMT is not a tightly organized political party. It was not before the establishment of the Nanjing National Government, and it is still not after the establishment of the Nanjing National Government. The KMT government is not a strictly party-run government, and the power of the Party Department is not superior to the government, which ultimately leads to changes in its central training institutions. But the KMT government does not really control the people.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：K263;D693

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐思彥;;合作與沖突:勞資糾紛中的資本家階級(jí)[J];安徽史學(xué);2007年06期

2 劉斌;;試論廣東時(shí)期國民黨黨治模式的演變——以黨政關(guān)系為中心[J];大眾文藝;2010年16期

3 龔啟耀;評(píng)孫中山的“以黨治國”思想與南京國民政府的“一黨專政”體制[J];福建廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期

4 武乾;南京國民政府的保甲制度與地方自治[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2001年06期

5 王合群;國民黨派系斗爭與浙江“二五減租”運(yùn)動(dòng)的興起[J];民國檔案;2002年02期

6 馬振犢;南京國民政府時(shí)期蔣介石思想理論簡析[J];民國檔案;2003年01期

7 梅德平;國民黨政府時(shí)期農(nóng)村合作社組織變遷的制度分析[J];民國檔案;2004年02期

8 溫波,張紅;南京國民政府成立初期的合法性危機(jī)[J];贛南師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期

9 彭厚文;國民黨中央政治委員會(huì)的演變述略[J];湖北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1993年04期

10 秦興洪;對(duì)孫中山三大政策確立過程的探討[J];華南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1984年02期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 徐秀麗;[N];中國社會(huì)科學(xué)院院報(bào);2006年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 趙紅;抗戰(zhàn)時(shí)期國民政府政治體制研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

2 孫巖;南京國民政府時(shí)期地方黨政關(guān)系研究[D];南京大學(xué);2011年

3 顏軍;孫中山民權(quán)主義研究[D];中國社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2000年

4 李默海;孫中山的憲政思想及其實(shí)踐問題研究[D];山東大學(xué);2006年

5 鄭率;蔣介石與民末憲政[D];吉林大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 裴本成;孫中山地方自治思想研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

2 邸軍;孫中山憲法思想研究[D];山東大學(xué);2006年

3 李玲麗;北伐前后湖北的商民協(xié)會(huì)[D];華中師范大學(xué);2007年

本文編號(hào)：1568408