發(fā)布時間：2018-02-09 00:14

  本文關鍵詞： 農村經濟研究會 中國農村 鄉(xiāng)村改良主義 卜凱 中國農村社會性質　出處：《山東師范大學》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：1933年,陳翰笙組織一批進步青年從事廣泛的農村調查并發(fā)表論述,這些產生了很大影響,引起了國民黨當局的忌恨與打擊,進步青年被“開除”出中央研究院社會科學研究所,陳翰笙在社會科學研究所也已難以立足,被迫辭職。為了進一步團結和整合學術隊伍,推動和加強農村經濟研究,經過陳翰笙和其他同志共同努力,于1933年12月組織成立了民間學術團體——中國農村經濟研究會。 陳翰笙被選為這個研究會理事會的主席。該研究會吸收社會名人吳覺農(中華農學會會長)、孫曉村(行政院農村復興委員會專員)、馮和法(著名的農業(yè)經濟學家)等。1934年8月,中國農村經濟研究會組織擴大,在上海舉行擴大會議。會內建立了中共的秘密領導小組。該研究會后來成員發(fā)展到1000人之多。研究會根據黨的政策方針開展研究和宣傳工作。中國農村經濟研究會存在期,一共選舉產生了五屆理事,陳翰笙始終是理事長。至此,這批胸懷革命理想的青年學人在國民黨統(tǒng)治區(qū)贏得了研究農村經濟的合法陣地,他們在中國農村社會性質大論戰(zhàn)。本論文主要分三部分對中國農村經濟研究會進行論證和總結概括。 首先,介紹了中國農村經濟研究會成立的原因與背景,成立后所創(chuàng)辦的刊物及成立后所做的學術事業(yè)和活動。這其中包括了中國農村經濟研究會成立的內外及國際原因,有力的論證了中國農村經濟研究會存在的合理性�！吨袊r村》這個刊物的特點和性質等。另一方面就是對于中國農村經濟研究會所做的學術事業(yè)的認同與農研會所做的活動。通過對以第一章的論證可以形成對于中國農村經濟研究會這個組織一種比較全面的概括和總結。 其次,中國農村經濟研究會與各個組織的論戰(zhàn),主要有三次這種論戰(zhàn)。第一次是關于贏得了關于中國農村社會性質問題論戰(zhàn)。第二次是對梁漱溟、晏陽初為代表的鄉(xiāng)村改良主義運動的批判。第三次是對美國資產階級學者卜凱錯誤論點的批評。 第三部分主要是關于中國農村經濟研究會及其活動所產生的影響,這些影響既包括對于黨的政策制定的影響與推動,也包括了對于中國農村經濟研究會以外各個經濟組織的產生的影響。 通過中國農村經濟研究會成員的調查與研究,有力的證實了當時的中國是一個半殖民地半封建的社會性質,宣傳了黨的政策與方針,駁斥了各個學派的觀點。也為黨在農村經濟政策的制定提供了理論上的支持和論證。
[Abstract]:In 1933, Chen Hansheng organized a group of progressive young people to carry out extensive rural investigations and published an exposition, which had a great impact on the Kuomintang authorities' hatred and crackdown, and the progressive youth were "expelled" from the Institute of Social Sciences of the Academia Sinica. Chen Hansheng has also been unable to gain a foothold in the Institute of Social Sciences and has been forced to resign. In order to further unite and integrate the academic team and promote and strengthen the study of rural economy, through the joint efforts of Chen Hansheng and other comrades, In December 1933, organized the establishment of a non-governmental academic group-China Rural Economic Research Association. Chen Hansheng was elected chairman of the council of the research institute. The research will draw on the famous social celebrities Wu Juenong (chairman of the Chinese agricultural association), Sun Xiaocun (commissioner of the rural rejuvenation committee of the executive yuan), Sun Xiaocun (famous agricultural economics). August 1934, The organization of the China Rural Economic Research Association has been expanded, An enlarged conference was held in Shanghai, during which a secret leading group of the Communist Party of China was set up. The research group later grew to as many as 1,000 members. The research committee carried out research and propaganda work in accordance with the Party's policy and guidelines. The China Rural Economic Research Association was in existence. A total of five governors were elected, and Chen Hansheng was always the chairman. So far, these young scholars with revolutionary ideals have won a legitimate position in studying rural economy in the Kuomintang ruling areas. This paper is divided into three parts to demonstrate and summarize the China Rural Economic Research Association. First of all, it introduces the reasons and background of the establishment of the China Rural Economic Research Association, the publications established after its establishment, and its academic undertakings and activities after its establishment, which includes the internal and external and international reasons for the establishment of the China Rural Economic Research Association. The paper proves the rationality of the existence of China Rural Economic Research Association. The characteristics and Nature of the publication. On the other hand, the recognition of the academic cause done by the China Rural Economic Research Association and the Agricultural Research Association. Through the argumentation in the first chapter, we can form a more comprehensive summary and summary for the organization of China Rural Economic Research Association. Secondly, there are mainly three such debates between the China Rural Economic Research Association and various organizations. The first one is about winning a debate on the nature of China's rural society. The second is about Liang Shuming. A critique of the rural reformist movement represented by Yen Yang Chu. The third is the criticism of the wrong arguments of the American bourgeois scholar Bok Kai. The third part mainly deals with the impact of the China Rural Economic Research Association and its activities, including the impact and promotion of the policy formulation of the Party. It also includes the impact on various economic organizations outside the China Rural Economic Research Association. Through the investigation and research conducted by members of the China Rural Economic Research Association, it was able to confirm that China was a semi-colonial and semi-feudal society at that time and propagandized the policies and principles of the Party. It refutes the viewpoints of various schools and provides theoretical support and argumentation for the formulation of the Party's rural economic policy.
【學位授予單位】：山東師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：F329;K263

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前3條

1 顏敏;;改革開放以來對“中國農村派”研究綜述[J];貴州財經學院學報;2010年01期

2 雷頤;“中國農村派”對中國革命的理論貢獻[J];近代史研究;1996年02期

3 殷曉嵐;卜凱與中國近代農業(yè)經濟學的發(fā)展[J];南京農業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2002年04期

相關重要報紙文章 前1條

1 安徽師范大學 汪效駟;[N];光明日報;2009年

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 王碩;《中國農村》與《中國經濟》關于中國農村問題的論戰(zhàn)[D];首都師范大學;2005年

，

本文編號：1496615