【摘要】：司馬遷與桑弘羊，同處西漢武帝時(shí)代，是這一時(shí)期杰出的經(jīng)濟(jì)思想家。作為史學(xué)家的司馬遷能夠比較客觀地觀察社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)生活并真實(shí)地載入史冊(cè)；而作為商人之后的桑弘羊則能深刻領(lǐng)悟商業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)之道，并且把它運(yùn)用于國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)管理之中，他們的經(jīng)濟(jì)思想堪稱西漢中期最具影響力和代表性的經(jīng)濟(jì)思想�？梢哉f，西漢社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)的繁榮與發(fā)展，特別是商品貨幣經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展為司馬遷、桑弘羊經(jīng)濟(jì)思想之形成提供了社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)土壤，使得他們對(duì)社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的一些問題有著近似的認(rèn)識(shí)和總結(jié)，但由于出身、入仕、承襲學(xué)派以及所處立場(chǎng)的不同又使得他們?cè)趯?duì)待西漢中期伴隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展而暴露出的社會(huì)矛盾表現(xiàn)出迥異認(rèn)識(shí)，集中體現(xiàn)在國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)管理的主張上背道而馳，即自由發(fā)展與國(guó)家干預(yù)兩種管理模式之爭(zhēng)。到目前為止，分別研究?jī)晌粴v史人物經(jīng)濟(jì)觀點(diǎn)、財(cái)政措施的文章層出不窮，但鮮有文章把兩人同時(shí)置于西漢武帝時(shí)代的歷史轉(zhuǎn)折背景下，系統(tǒng)論述兩種經(jīng)濟(jì)思想，并比較和分析這兩種經(jīng)濟(jì)思想產(chǎn)生的經(jīng)濟(jì)、政治、文化條件以及對(duì)中國(guó)封建社會(huì)的深遠(yuǎn)影響。鑒于此，我想通過本文對(duì)以上問題進(jìn)行探討。比較這兩種經(jīng)濟(jì)思想的異同，，能夠準(zhǔn)確地分析西漢社會(huì)政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)以及思想領(lǐng)域的發(fā)展與變化；有助于深刻理解我國(guó)古代經(jīng)濟(jì)思想發(fā)展的脈絡(luò)，同時(shí)也是對(duì)這兩位思想家個(gè)案研究的深化。
[Abstract]:Si Maqian and Sang Hongyang were the outstanding economic thinkers of the Western Han Dynasty. As a historian, Si Maqian was able to observe social and economic life more objectively and truly go down in history. As a businessman, Sang Hong-yang was able to deeply understand the way of business management and apply it to the economic management of the country. Their economic thought can be rated as the most influential and representative economic thought in the middle of the Western Han Dynasty. It can be said that the prosperity and development of the social economy of the Western Han Dynasty, especially the development of the commodity monetary economy, provided the social and economic soil for the formation of Si Maqian and Sang Hongyang's economic thought. So that they have similar understanding and summary of some problems of social and economic development, but because of their origin, they become official. The inheritance school and their different positions made them show different understanding of the social contradictions exposed along with the economic development in the middle of the Western Han Dynasty, and concentrated on the idea of national economic management. Namely free development and state intervention two kinds of management mode dispute. Up to now, the economic viewpoints of two historical figures have been studied separately, and the articles on fiscal measures have emerged in endlessly, but few articles have systematically discussed the two kinds of economic thoughts under the historical turning point background of the Western Han Dynasty. And compare and analyze the economic, political, cultural conditions and the profound influence on the feudal society of China. In view of this, I would like to discuss the above issues through this article. Comparing the similarities and differences between these two economic thoughts can accurately analyze the development and changes of the political, economic and ideological fields of the Western Han Dynasty, and contribute to a profound understanding of the context of the development of the ancient economic thoughts in China. At the same time, it is the deepening of the case study of these two thinkers.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2006
【分類號(hào)】：K234.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 葉小草;《杜周傳》與“司馬遷去世的時(shí)間”[J];淮陰師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1999年03期

2 宋光輝;;儒法經(jīng)濟(jì)思想的對(duì)立與統(tǒng)一:一個(gè)西漢的案例[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)情況;2008年12期

3 鹿

本文編號(hào)：2266997