本文選題：唐代知制誥 + 使職特征�。� 參考：《史林》2014年06期

【摘要】：唐史學(xué)界過去從未論及知制誥是一種使職。學(xué)者一般都視此官為職事官,或當(dāng)作"兼官"來處理,或語焉不詳,未能看清此官的本質(zhì),在論述時常把知制誥和中書舍人混淆。本文從使職定義、官名結(jié)構(gòu)、任命方式以及白居易的唐人見證,論證知制誥是一種使職(類似宋代的差遣職),跟中書舍人這種正規(guī)職事官不同屬性,兩者不應(yīng)混淆。
[Abstract]:Tang historiography has never mentioned that the Letters Patent is a kind of official duty in the past. Scholars generally regard this official as an official, or as a "concurrently official" to deal with, or vague, unable to see the nature of this official, often confused between the knowledge Letters Patent and the Chinese scholar. Based on the definition of official, the structure of official name, the way of appointment and the testimony of Bai Juyi in Tang Dynasty, this paper demonstrates that Letters Patent is a kind of official post (similar to the sending post of Song Dynasty, which is different from the official of the official in the book of letters), and the two should not be confused.
【作者單位】： 臺灣新竹清華大學(xué)歷史研究所;
【分類號】：K242

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 張連城;;唐后期中書舍人草詔權(quán)考述[J];文獻;1992年02期

2 岕瑞和;;再娭唐代的使，

本文編號：1990301