本文選題：《諸儒鳴道集》 + 語錄�。� 參考：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2007年博士論文

【摘要】： 本論文的主旨，是研究《諸儒鳴道集》這部宋人自己編選的道學(xué)叢書�！吨T儒鳴道集》作為上海圖書館的珍藏資料，首先在于它為今人保存了不少比現(xiàn)存宋代文獻(xiàn)年代更早更可靠的語錄版本。但是它的價值遠(yuǎn)不止于此，它為研究宋代道學(xué)發(fā)展初期的原始面貌打開了一扇窗戶。本論文以分析《諸儒鳴道集》的文本為主，展開三方面論述，并獲得相關(guān)論點(diǎn)如下。 第一，《諸儒鳴道集》收錄的一批道學(xué)家，從師承交游的復(fù)雜的人際關(guān)系網(wǎng)絡(luò)方面，一則透露出道學(xué)在發(fā)展時期多元化的特性，二則顯示出宋代道學(xué)團(tuán)體以學(xué)術(shù)活動為表現(xiàn)方式，對當(dāng)時社會政治的積極參與。立足于這個特點(diǎn)，本論文的研究取得兩方面進(jìn)展，一則根據(jù)北宋時代的禁書資料，結(jié)合南宋時代的“慶元黨禁”，發(fā)掘出《諸儒鳴道集》可能的流傳不暢的緣故。二則通過《諸儒鳴道集》提供的道學(xué)家名單，清理對這批道學(xué)家“道學(xué)”與“非道學(xué)”的身份評判，從而修正較為狹隘的道學(xué)定義，為這批道學(xué)家在當(dāng)時的道學(xué)地位正名。 第二，圍繞金代學(xué)者李純甫對《諸儒鳴道集》的回應(yīng)，經(jīng)由分析李純甫對這批道學(xué)家辟佛的批評，，了解北宋道學(xué)時期，佛教對道學(xué)的影響。并從李純甫的“中國心學(xué)”、“西方名教”著手，推衍《諸儒鳴道集》這部語錄集在南宋“心學(xué)”發(fā)生時期，可能的學(xué)派傾向與學(xué)說傳承。這或許能提供豐富補(bǔ)充學(xué)界關(guān)于道學(xué)的心性性理發(fā)展演變的見解。 第三，《諸儒鳴道集》的“道學(xué)學(xué)譜”，不同于以往程朱學(xué)派的道統(tǒng)譜系，最重要在于提供了司馬光學(xué)派在南宋道學(xué)時期的道學(xué)開山地位的證明。在兩宋學(xué)術(shù)演變史中，關(guān)于“宋六子”到“宋五子”的一段歷史脈絡(luò)。至今沒有很好的說明，《諸儒鳴道集》提供的第一手的本證資料，反映出一個情況，那就是朱熹對早期道學(xué)譜系所做的修正。那以后，在學(xué)術(shù)競爭的過程中，被朱熹抽離掉的道學(xué)家，在后世道學(xué)發(fā)展及學(xué)者的研究中，這些道學(xué)家就漸漸被忽略和遺忘�！吨T儒鳴道集》保留這些道學(xué)家的重要文獻(xiàn)，某種程度上還原了道學(xué)早期的原貌，進(jìn)而突顯了重新評價司馬光學(xué)派道學(xué)定位的價值。本論文引入歷史資料，嘗試對這個問題做出歷史的解釋。
[Abstract]:The main purpose of this thesis is to study the collection of Zhujuming and Taoism, a series of Taoist books compiled by the Song people themselves. The first is that it preserves many earlier and more reliable quotations than the existing Song Dynasty documents. But its value is far more than that. It opens a window for the study of the primitive appearance of Taoism in the early stage of the development of Taoism in the Song Dynasty. This thesis focuses on the analysis of the texts of Zhujuming and Taoism, and discusses in three aspects, and obtains the relevant arguments as follows. First, a group of Taoists included in the collection of Zhujuming and Taoism, in terms of the complex network of interpersonal relationships between teachers and scholars, first revealed the diversified nature of Taoism during its development period, and the other showed that Taoist groups in the Song Dynasty expressed their academic activities as a way of expression. The active participation in the society and politics of that time. Based on this characteristic, the research of this paper has made two progress. First, according to the forbidden books of the Northern Song Dynasty and the "Qingyuan Party Ban" in the Southern Song Dynasty, we can find out the possible reason why the collection of Confucianism and Taoism is not well circulated. Secondly, through the list of Taoists provided by Zhujuming Taoism, we can clear up the status of the Daoists'"Daoism" and "non-Daoism", so as to revise the narrower definition of Daoism and correct the status of the Daoists at that time. Secondly, according to the response of Li Junfu, a scholar of Jin Dynasty, to the collection of Confucianism and Taoism, by analyzing Li Chunfu's criticism of these Taoists, we can understand the influence of Buddhism on Taoism during the Northern Song Dynasty. Starting from Li Chun-fu 's "Chinese mind study" and "Western famous religion", the author deduces the collection of quotations from Zhuge Confucianism and Taoism, which may have been inherited from the school tendency and doctrine of the Southern Song Dynasty during the time of the occurrence of "the study of the mind". This may provide a wealth of complementary academic views on the evolution of the psychological nature of Taoism. Thirdly, the "Taoist spectrum" of Zhujuming and Taoism is different from the Taoist genealogy of the Chengzhou-Zhu School, and the most important one is to provide the proof of the Taoism's position in the Southern Song Dynasty. In the history of the academic evolution of Song Dynasty, there is a historical context from "Song Liu Zi" to "Song five son". There is no good explanation so far. The firsthand evidential data provided by Zhujuming and Taoism reflects the correction of the early Taoist genealogy made by Zhu Xi. After that, in the process of academic competition, the Taoists who were removed by Zhu Xi were gradually ignored and forgotten in the development of Taoism in later generations and in the research of scholars. To some extent, it restored the original appearance of early Taoism, and then highlighted the value of reevaluating the Taoist orientation of Si Maguang school. This paper introduces historical data to try to make a historical explanation of this problem.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類號】：K244

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王耘;走向共同文明[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2008年

本文編號：1939801