本文選題：清代 + 《尚書》學(xué)　； 參考：《華中師范大學(xué)》2011年博士論文

【摘要】：《尚書》作為儒家經(jīng)典之一,歷代學(xué)者不斷為之故、訓(xùn)、傳、說。到清代,《尚書》學(xué)研究進(jìn)入一個(gè)新的階段,無論在研究的深度和廣度上,還是在研究的思想和方法上,都是以前各朝代無法比擬的；而且今人在研究《尚書》時(shí),也都不能不考察清代《尚書》學(xué)的研究成果,作為自身研究的起點(diǎn)。 清代《尚書》學(xué)的演變與清代學(xué)術(shù)思想的變遷緊密聯(lián)系在一起。明清鼎革,使一大批士人在反思明亡的教訓(xùn)中,把矛頭指向王明心學(xué)。在這樣的背景下,《尚書》研究的重心是反思蔡沈《書集傳》給學(xué)界帶來的影響；最為重要的成果,是把東晉梅賾所上古文《尚書》中二十五篇定為偽書。到乾嘉時(shí)期,考據(jù)思想主導(dǎo)著學(xué)界,《尚書》辨?zhèn)螌W(xué)者的重心是探尋二十八篇真古文《尚書》的意蘊(yùn)。到晚清時(shí)期,清廷面臨內(nèi)憂外患,經(jīng)世致用思想再次激起波瀾,《尚書》學(xué)研究的旨趣發(fā)生轉(zhuǎn)變,在今文經(jīng)學(xué)的主導(dǎo)下,《尚書》辨?zhèn)尾粌H在于它的學(xué)術(shù)意義,而且是清儒面對(duì)世變而作出的應(yīng)急反應(yīng)。 清儒中以閻若璩為代表的辨?zhèn)闻珊鸵悦纨g為代表的證實(shí)派,對(duì)古文《尚書》的傳承系統(tǒng)展開爭(zhēng)論,其大旨在于證明各自傳承體系的合法性。兩派辯論的焦點(diǎn)是東晉梅賾所上古文《尚書》中的二十五篇的真?zhèn)?他們主要圍繞二十五篇的篇目篇數(shù)、文體格制、文獻(xiàn)來源等議題進(jìn)行激烈辯論。通過這些辯論,雖然兩派都難以拿出有力的證據(jù)說服對(duì)方,但是使東晉梅賾所上古文《尚書》存在的爭(zhēng)議問題更加明晰,使后人更清楚的看到問題的根結(jié)。辨?zhèn)闻珊徒裎膶W(xué)家均在追尋晚書的作者。這二十五篇雖然被多數(shù)人否定,但是其思想的合理內(nèi)核,并沒有因?yàn)閮膳蓪W(xué)者的辯論而喪失,兩派都在不同程度上探討了二十五篇的思想價(jià)值。 有清一代,整個(gè)長(zhǎng)江中下游流域是糧食的主產(chǎn)區(qū),呈現(xiàn)“湖廣熟,天下足”的格局。同時(shí)在戰(zhàn)略上,長(zhǎng)江中下游是南北交通的交集區(qū),而這個(gè)地區(qū)水災(zāi)也不斷發(fā)生。清代《尚書》研究學(xué)者對(duì)長(zhǎng)江中下游的水道問題的關(guān)注,集中表現(xiàn)在對(duì)三江、九江地望的考論。他們通過梳理三江、九江地望的歷史沿革,試圖找到二大地望的具體方位,以便解決當(dāng)時(shí)社會(huì)的需要。 清朝是傳統(tǒng)學(xué)術(shù)總結(jié)的重要時(shí)代,對(duì)《尚書》的輯佚和歷代經(jīng)解的匯編恰恰反映出這個(gè)時(shí)代儒學(xué)的基本走向。清儒《尚書》輯佚和經(jīng)解匯編不僅在總結(jié)學(xué)術(shù),而且把輯佚、匯編與學(xué)術(shù)研究結(jié)合起來,又與社會(huì)思潮的變遷聯(lián)系在一起,體現(xiàn)出強(qiáng)烈的時(shí)代性。
[Abstract]:Shang Shu, as one of the Confucian classics, has been taught, preached and said by scholars of all dynasties. By the Qing Dynasty, the study of Shangshu had entered a new stage. The depth and breadth of the study, as well as the thought and method of the study, were incomparable to those of the previous dynasties. It is also necessary to examine the research results of Shangshu in Qing Dynasty as the starting point of its own research. The evolution of Shang Shu in Qing Dynasty is closely related to the change of academic thought in Qing Dynasty. During the Ming and Qing dynasties, a large number of scholars pointed their spearhead at Wang Mingxin in reflecting on the lessons of the Ming Dynasty. Under this background, the focus of the study of Shang Shu is to reflect on the influence that Cai Shen has brought to the academic circle, and the most important achievement is to make 25 articles in the ancient prose "Shang Shu" of the Eastern Jin Dynasty as a false book. By the Qianjia period, textual research thought dominated the academic circle, and the focus of the scholars was to explore the meaning of 28 true ancient writings. In the late Qing Dynasty, the Qing Dynasty faced with internal and external troubles, the thought of applying the world to the world again stirred up waves, and the purport of the study of "Shang Shu" changed again. Under the guidance of the modern literary classics, the identification of the "Shang Shu" was not only due to its academic significance. Moreover, it was an emergency response of the Qing Confucianism to the change of the world. In the Qing Dynasty, Yan Ruoqu as the representative of the false school and Mao Qiling as the representative of the confirmative school, the ancient prose "Shang Shu" inheritance system, the main purpose is to prove the legitimacy of their inheritance system. The focus of the debate between the two schools is the authenticity of the 25 articles in the ancient prose "Shang Shu" in the Eastern Jin Dynasty. They mainly focus on the number of titles of 25 articles, the system of literary physique, and the sources of documents, and so on. Through these debates, it is difficult for both schools to come up with strong evidence to convince each other, but to make the dispute in the ancient prose "Shang Shu" in the Eastern Jin Dynasty more clear, so that future generations can see the root of the problem more clearly. Both counterfeiters and today's writers are looking for the author of the late book. Although the 25 articles have been denied by the majority, the rational core of their thoughts has not been lost because of the debate between the two schools of scholars. Both schools have discussed the ideological value of 25 articles in varying degrees. The whole middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River were the main grain producing areas in Qing Dynasty. At the same time, strategically, the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River are an intersection of traffic between the north and the south, and floods continue to occur in this area. In the Qing Dynasty, scholars paid attention to the waterway problems in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River. By combing the historical evolution of Sanjiang and Jiujiang, they tried to find out the specific position of the two landmarks in order to solve the needs of the society at that time. Qing Dynasty is an important era of traditional academic summary. The collection of Shang Shu and the compilation of ancient classics exactly reflect the basic trend of Confucianism in this era. The lost book of Shang Shu of the Qing Dynasty and the compilation of the classics not only summarize the academic, but also combine the collection, compilation and academic research, and also relate to the change of the social trend of thought, which reflects the strong character of the times.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：K249

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 趙倩倩;清代經(jīng)解文獻(xiàn)系年考—咸同光宣時(shí)期[D];華中師范大學(xué);2012年

2 梁媛;清代經(jīng)解文獻(xiàn)系年考[D];華中師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1784582